In Kentucky, a homeland security law requires the state’s
citizens to acknowledge the security provided by the Almighty God--or risk 12
months in prison.
The law and its sponsor, state representative Tom Riner, have
been the subject of controversy since the law first surfaced in 2006, yet the
Kentucky state Supreme Court has refused to review its constitutionality,
despite clearly violating the First Amendment’s separation of church and state.
"This is one of the most egregiously and breathtakingly
unconstitutional actions by a state legislature that I've ever seen," said Edwin
Kagin, the legal director of American Atheists', a national organization focused
defending the civil rights of atheists. American Atheists’ launched a lawsuit
against the law in 2008, which won at the Circuit Court level, but was then
overturned by the state Court of Appeals.
The law states, "The safety and security of the Commonwealth
cannot be achieved apart from reliance upon Almighty God as set forth in the
public speeches and proclamations of American Presidents, including Abraham
Lincoln's historic March 30, 1863, presidential proclamation urging Americans to
pray and fast during one of the most dangerous hours in American history, and
the text of President John F. Kennedy's November 22, 1963, national security
speech which concluded: "For as was written long ago: 'Except the Lord keep the
city, the watchman waketh but in vain.'"
The law requires that plaques celebrating the power of the
Almighty God be installed outside the state Homeland Security building--and
carries a criminal penalty of up to 12 months in jail if one fails to comply.
The plaque’s inscription begins with the assertion, “The safety and security of
the Commonwealth cannot be achieved apart from reliance upon Almighty God.”
Tom Riner, a Baptist minister and the long-time Democratic
state representative, sponsored the law.
“The church-state divide is not a line I see,” Riner told
New York Times shortly after the law was first challenged in court.
“What I do see is an attempt to separate America from its history of perceiving
itself as a nation under God.”
A practicing Baptist minister, Riner is solely devoted to his
faith--even when that directly conflicts with his job as state representative.
He has often been at the center of unconstitutional and expensive controversies
throughout his 26 years in office. In the last ten years, for example, the state
has spent more than $160,000 in string of losing court cases against the
American Civil Liberties Union over the state’s decision to display the Ten
Commandments in public buildings, legislation that Riner sponsored.
Although the Kentucky courts have yet to strike down the law,
some judges have been explicit about its unconstitutionality.
"Kentucky's law is a legislative finding, avowed as factual,
that the Commonwealth is not safe absent reliance on Almighty God. Further, (the
law) places a duty upon the executive director to publicize the assertion while
stressing to the public that dependence upon Almighty God is vital, or
necessary, in assuring the safety of the commonwealth,” wrote Judge Ann O'Malley
Shake in Court of Appeals’ dissenting opinion.
This rational was in the minority, however, as the Court of
Appeals reversed the lower courts’ decision that the law was unconstitutional.
Last week, American Atheists submitted a petition to the U.S.
Supreme Court to review the law.
Riner, meanwhile, continues to abuse the state
representative’s office, turning it into a pulpit for his God-fearing message.
"The safety and security of the state cannot be achieved apart
from recognizing our dependence upon God," Riner recently t old Fox News.
"We believe dependence on God is essential. ... What the
founding fathers stated and what every president has stated, is their reliance
and recognition of Almighty God, that's what we're doing," he said.