“ Excellent; informative and great opportunity for networking. ”
— Cornelia B. on Feb 11, 2015.
“ once again good to make new friends and share ideas in this fast moving space ”
— Robin B. on Feb 11, 2014.
“ This was a great event, thank you for organising. Good location and very fancy offices, thank you Nesta! ”
— masha c. on Feb 10, 2014.
“ Was first time for me. ”
— Sabine K M. on Feb 11, 2013.
“ Super cool bunch of people; Very intelligent lot who made me feel very welcome! :-) ”
— Shourik on Feb 7, 2012.
“ Because you'll get to share with people who have real experience of making things work, not people who are selling. ”
— Thomas on Feb 7, 2012.
“ An interesting and diverse mixture of people. ”
— John W. on Feb 7, 2012.
“ Excellent holistic thinking opportunity - not rooted within industry/ market constraints ”
— Barret S. on Feb 7, 2012.
“ It's a great opportunity to exchange views with people involved in widely varying activities & projects related to financial/banking/payments innovation. ”
— Richard J. on Feb 7, 2012.
“ I strongly recommand to any people from the financial sector to participate. That was awesome, Thanks to dave, Angela and the crew. ”
— Claire C. on Feb 7, 2012.
“ I'm mainly non-corporate although I still do a little consulting, so whilst this is a good group for 'careers' and entrepreneurs [whatever that is in French, if you know that joke] it's less of a place for grass roots finance activists. ”
— Hugh B. on Feb 7, 2012.
“ Based on first meeting, very good ”
— Andy F. on Feb 1, 2011.
“ I love the concept, and will hasten to sign up for another. Incredible amount of industry-expertise amongst the participants. ”
— Peter C. on Feb 1, 2011.
“ There was a lot to be gained from people with varying levels and experience and new ideas. ”
— gloria b. on Feb 1, 2011.
“ It was amazing. I am now looking forward to book every BarCamp London in my calendar. Big thanks to everyone who have made this BarCamp London 4 possible. ”
— Daniel G. on Feb 1, 2011.
“ Very interesting discussions. I think we could have split into smaller groups and generated more tangible output, however very interesting discussions and discovery. ”
— kevin F. on Jan 31, 2011.
“ Because they're missing out on a big debate that they should be part of ”
— Liz H. on Feb 1, 2010.