RE: [atheists-501] Re: [atheists-501]

From: Stephen P.
Sent on: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:20 PM

Graham

Does this response suffice?

G: I'll try and answer your question mate: I think it’s because I'm just so used to using well rehearsed leftist diatribe

SP: That statement was made about someone else but if its true for you so be it. Cap fits???

G: Besides agreeing to disagree basically means I let you have your opinion....I shut up and don't oppose it in any way doesn’t it?

SP: No!

G: And to my way of thinking that is just your attempt to stop opposing points of view?

SP: No! Simply and exchange of views underpinned by a mutual respect and without personal attacks.

G: Anyhow I think I answered your question to the best of my ability....and only being a little condescending too but I'm sure you can handle that.

SP: No you didn’t it was specifically “Why can’t you just agree to disagree without being condescending?”

G: Ok so you still have my questions below? You can have a go at answering them now please

SP: Even though you really didn’t keep up your end I will answer your questions in the spirit of building bridges.

Q1: Exactly what you are championing. So what's your agenda?

A1: Non-theism having a place in society on par with religions in there various forms, atheism being demystified and just as much apart of religious education as gay lifestyles are in sexual education, complete separation of Church and state with the abolition of political parties with a religious base, a bill of rights, Atheists forming an effective lobby to counter fundamentalist Christian interference in matters of state free of left or right leanings, rational secular decision making on things like gay marriage, stem cell research. I could go on and on but I think you get the picture.

Q2: What's your problem?

A2: Don’t have one!

Q3: Do you think we are winning the War On Terrorism?

A3: Yes and no – I think it is more a war on fundamentalist Islam. Afghanistan, Yes! Iraq, No! But to be accurate Iraq was not about terrorism.

Q4: Was Howard’s decision to go to Iraq one of homeland security or was it a political decision.

A4: Both, it was about honouring our ANZUS commitments and Howard taking as little political risk as possible in the process by limiting numbers and locations. I do not really believe Howard given the choice would have gone there! It was always a political risk and it (the War) has not been effectively prosecuted by the US. I am sure Howard would have been quite happy if it had never happened!

Q5: Does YOUR agenda affect the way you answer those questions?

A5: No

Q6: And for the biggy......how do we win the war on terrorism?

A6: Be the last man standing and never give in. If we lived in a secular world it would not be an issue. I think there lays a clue.

Q7: Can you answer those questions rather than flame me? Or do you sidestep just like a slippery right wing politician? Don't be afraid to use that alternate point of view of yours. Don't worry about who reads it

A7: If you won’t flame others, no side step here, although the way you sidestepped mine shows the left can be slippery too! I’m not concerned who reads it!

 

First of all I am not right wing; I have some left, right and centrist views most of which I have been formed by either experiences or observations and what I see as the best balance in any situation, with an emphasis on the rights and responsibilities of the individual so your assumptions are wrong. I am actually 40 years old, married with two children and have no political affiliation what so ever. In fact last election I did not vote at all as neither side disserved it!

G: Your attack on me was pretty infantile really, only really designed to get a bite (attention seeking?) and to go on with it is only a lesson in futility.

SP: Well why did you attack Frank? Maybe you were being just as infantile, seeking attention and giving us a lesson in futility.

Regards

 

Steve Pearce

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [address removed] [mailto:[address removed]] On Behalf Of Graham
Sent: Tuesday, 17 July[masked]:24 AM
To: [address removed]
Subject: RE: [atheists-501] Re: [atheists-501]

 

G'day Stephen,

                      I'll try and answer your question mate: I think its because I'm just so used to using well rehearsed leftist diatribe? Besides agreeing to disagree basically means I let you have your opinion....I shut up and don't oppose it in any way doesnt it? And to my way of thinking that is just your attempt to stop opposing points of view? Anyhow I think I answered your question to the best of my ability....and only being a little condescending too but I'm sure you can handle that.

Ok so you still have my questions below? You can have a go at answering them now please. There are several there but I think the key ones are: "How do we win the war on terrorism" and "Does your agenda affect the way you answer those questions? At least those two are important ones for me to find answers to. The answer to the first question I think we would all like the answer to. The second question will tell me a lot about your capacity for honesty.

Kind regards, Graham Manning.

 

P.S. everything is political mate. That's just an unfortunate fact of life. I realise you are a right wing atheist. That puts you in a difficult position as the right wing partys are in the majority christian conservatives by nature and policy. A frightening parralel is that Islamic fundamentalists are also right wing conservative (bit more extreme though) and your political stance is going to continue to put you at loggerheads with the majority of atheist political opinion. Did you read the article in the Brisbane Sunday Mail? : http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,22073821-5007191,00.html

I thought you might find it interesting (and others also) it would be better go read this rather than answer my questions anyhow. I realise you are restricted in how you answer them by virtue of you narrow political viewpoints you hold. You seem intelligent to me though. I'm thinking you may be young however? I don't really know but I'll no doubt find out in due time. Your attack on me was pretty infantile really, only really designed to get a bite (attention seeking?) and to go on with it is only a lesson in futility.

 

 



Stephen Pearce <[address removed]> wrote:

Graham

I’m quite happy to answer all those questions if you will answer the question I posed first, “Why can’t you just agree to disagree without being condescending?”

Steve Pearce

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [address removed] [mailto:[address removed]] On Behalf Of Graham
Sent: Tuesday, 17 July[masked]:38 AM
To: [address removed]
Subject: RE: [atheists-501] Re: [atheists-501]

 

G'day Steve,

                  All fair questions from an alternate point of view. Exactly what you are championing. So what's your agenda? What's your problem? Do you think we are winning the War On Terrorism? Was Howards decision to go to Iraq one of homeland security or was it a political decision. Does YOUR agenda affect the way you answer those questions?

And for the biggy......how do we win the war on terrorism? Can you answer those questions rather than flame me? Or do you sidestep just like a slippery right wing politician? Don't be afraid to use that alternate point of view of yours. Don't worry about who reads it. This is just atheists-501. There are SFA people here to read it. LMAO :-)

Graham

 

Go to Yahoo Group Atheists_Australia folks:

 



Stephen Pearce <[address removed]> wrote:

Graham

Why do you have to get personal by adding “What's your real agenda? Have you read Machiavelli? So many questions......so little time.” And get personal just because someone expresses an alternate point of view. Why can’t you just agree to disagree without being condescending? After all expressing an alternate point of view is allowed here.

Steve Pearce

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [address removed] [mailto:[address removed]] On Behalf Of Graham
Sent: Tuesday, 17 July[masked]:55 AM
To: [address removed]
Subject: [atheists-501] Re: [atheists-501]

 

G'day Frank,

                  Are we winning the War on Terrorism? Or are we just perpetuating terrorism? How do you suggest we actually "win" this war on terrorism?

Was Howards decision to go to Iraq a homeland security decision or was it a political decision? Do you think that the USA economy is dependant on their involvement with military conflict? Do you think the war in Iraq has anything to do with Oil? Did the USA find any Weapons of Mass Destruction? Are there parralels between the war in Iraq and the war in Vietnam? Will Iran be next on the USA hit list? When faced with the possibility of losing their seat, will a politician suddenly think their leaders policys might need changing? When enough people get pissed off enough with a governments actions can they make a difference? What's your real agenda? Have you read Machiavelli? So many questions......so little time.

Graham.



freetobe <[address removed]> wrote:

 Hi Julian.

 

With respect i totally disagree with your statement and as far as i'm concerned security must be paramount in this country even at the cost of some civil rights as we are fighting terrorism on a global scale with innocent people being killed in their thousands.  Australia must take steps to protect itstelf anyway possible as being a multicultural  society and having people from all over the world coming into our land makes normal security impossible.

Terrorism is taking away our civil rights and in times of war this will happen as we are at WAR !

 

Regards

Frank.

 

 

 

Free Animations for your email - By IncrediMail!



--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by freetobe ([address removed]) from The Brisbane Atheists Meetup Group.
To learn more about freetobe, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA

 

 


The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.



--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Graham ([address removed]) from The Brisbane Atheists Meetup Group.
To learn more about Graham, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA





--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Stephen Pearce ([address removed]) from The Brisbane Atheists Meetup Group.
To learn more about Stephen Pearce, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA

 

 


Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.



--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Graham ([address removed]) from The Brisbane Atheists Meetup Group.
To learn more about Graham, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA





--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Stephen Pearce ([address removed]) from The Brisbane Atheists Meetup Group.
To learn more about Stephen Pearce, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA

 

 


Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.



--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Graham ([address removed]) from The Brisbane Atheists Meetup Group.
To learn more about Graham, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA

This email message originally included an attachment.

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy