addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1linklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

CFI Skeptics of Eugene Message Board › Bad Science Location

Bad Science Location

Sam L.
user 3645559
Marcola, OR
We're back to the Eugene City Brewery, 'cause its so much easier to include everyone in the conversation when we're sitting around a round (or maybe square) table. I'll be looking for another venue for the March discussion, if you have any suggestions!

See ya soon!
Ruth M.
Nice, FR
Post #: 160
Could AHA at UO sponsor us nd provide a room for us to meet?
Lowell T.
user 9892585
Eugene, OR
Post #: 47
Bella has told me a few times that she would love to host the group at her house. I know she's written to you, Laurie, but she never heard back, and I couldn't give her your phone number because I don't have it.
Ruth M.
Nice, FR
Post #: 178

Check out this video from the TV show "The Doctors"

The young doctor explained that, over millions of years, evolution produced systems in varied animals that are usually (but not always) very similar. Then the oldest doctor said god generously gave us some duplicate organs. And the woman doctor said yeah in agreement to his religious statement.

. . .
Ruth M.
Nice, FR
Post #: 179

Weak DNA Evidence Poses Problems in Court

Prosecutors implicated Cleveland Barrett, of Chicago, in the sexual assault of a nine-year-old girl by telling the jury that Barrett's DNA was found on the victim, but what investigators had found was actually much less powerful than what the public has come to expect from DNA evidence. The DNA was not from semen-common in rape cases-rather from cells taken from the girl's lips. The DNA profile that the analyst was able to extract from the evidence was of little probative value, matching 1 in 4 African Americans, 1 in 8 Hispanics, and 1 in 9 Caucasians-hundreds of thousands of men in the Chicago area alone.

Barrett was acquitted (after spending a year in prison), but experts say that there are numerous other cases across the country in which similarly weak DNA evidence is being presented in court, posing grave risks to the defendants in these cases and to the future of DNA evidence.

As Gregory O'Reilly, chief of the forensic science division for the Cook County public defender's office, said to the Chicago Tribune:

"There's a terrific power in the phrase 'DNA match.' And there's a great risk that the jury will put great significance on this when it's not significant at all.
It doesn't only run the risk of convicting an innocent person or letting bad science into the courtroom, but you're going to undermine the very power that's behind DNA in the public consciousness. The meaning of 'match' will become so trivialized that you'll mix powerful science with junk science, powerful evidence with junk evidence. It's going to lead to a lot of confusion. Because this is DNA."

Read the full article.

Read more about unreliable or improper forensic science.

Powered by mvnForum

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy