Reading Discussion - James's "The Will to Believe"

  • March 16 · 2:00 PM
  • This location is shown only to members

Hi Philosophy Meetup Group members,

Our next meeting will be a discussion of William James’s “The Will to Believe.” In this classic 19th Century paper, James defends “our right to adopt a believing attitude in religious matters” against the view that one should only believe that which is demonstrated by evidence. Though our discussion will center on James’s argument, you may find it useful to understand the piece as a response to William Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief.” The following statements summarize these competing views:

Clifford: “It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.”

James: “Our passional nature not only lawfully may, but must, decide an option between propositions, whenever it is a genuine option that cannot by its nature be decided on intellectual grounds; for to say, under such circumstances, ‘Do not decide, but leave the question open,’ is itself a passional decision, - just like deciding yes or no, - and is attended with the same risk of losing the truth.”

Both papers are in the public domain and available for free online. If you don’t have time to read both in their entirety, I suggest reading only the first (of three sections) of the Clifford piece, and as much as you can of the James (though it’s a bit trickier to understand James’s position without reading the entire article).

Part I of Clifford: http://myweb.lmu.edu/tshanahan/Clifford-Ethics_of_Belief.html

James: http://educ.jmu.edu//~omearawm/ph101willtobelieve.html

(James - alternative URL): http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/j/james/william/will/index.html

Note that these papers engage directly with questions in the philosophy of religion. However, that does not mean that this meeting will be an open forum for religious proselytizing or bashing. This will be a polite and respectful discussion of Clifford and James’s arguments only, and not of the general merits and faults of organized religion. I’ll be moderating accordingly.

I hope to see you at the meeting!

Best,

Stephen

Join or login to comment.

  • James C.

    Thanks for hosting, organising and keeping the discussion on track. It's interesting to go back and reread the text again afterwards and Russell's summary at this link, pp[masked]

    https://archive.org/details/west...­

    March 22

  • Fed K.

    March 17

  • farnaz

    Oh, sorry I missed it. I never realized when I was moved from waiting list to RSVP. Does that happen automatically? That's a bummer - I really wanted to catch this one...

    March 16

  • Loreen H.

    Thank you all for an engaging discussion this afternoon. Looking forward to the next event. Special thanks to Steven and Olaf for organizing and hosting. A very well run and moderated discussion.

    2 · March 16

  • David

    Great.

    March 16

  • Laura R.

    So sorry Stephen for the last minute change. We have people from out of town that came in unexpectedly. Looking forward the next discussion.

    March 15

  • Stephen

    Sorry about that, Laura. The original link still seems to be working for me. Here's a different URL: http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/j...­

    March 2

  • Laura R.

    Stephen: I am having trouble downloading the James: paper. Can you advise, please.

    March 2

14 went

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Create your own Meetup Group

Get started Learn more
Rafaël

We just grab a coffee and speak French. Some people have been coming every week for months... it creates a kind of warmth to the group.

Rafaël, started French Conversation Group

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy