addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwchatcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-crosscrosseditemptyheartfacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgoogleimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinmagnifying-glassmailminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1outlookpersonplusprice-ribbonImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruseryahoo

Charlotte Philosophy Discussion Group Message Board › transition from central public governance to private governance

transition from central public governance to private governance

A former member
Post #: 314

Anarchy and the Efficient Law, Part 2 | David Friedman


In his book The Machinery of Freedom (1973), Friedman sketched a form of anarcho-capitalism where all goods and services including law itself can be produced by the free market.

This differs from the version proposed by Murray Rothbard, where a legal code would first be consented to by the parties involved in setting up the anarcho-capitalist society.

Friedman advocates an incrementalist approach to achieve anarcho-capitalism by gradual privatization of areas that government is involved in, ultimately privatizing law and order itself.

In the book, he states his opposition to violent anarcho-capitalist revolution.

He uses a consequentialist version of anarcho-capitalism. Friedman's version of individualist anarchism is not based on the assumption of inviolable natural rights but rather rests on a cost-benefit analysis of state versus no state.

It is contrasted with the natural-rights approach as propounded most notably by Austrian School economist, libertarian theorist and anarcho-capitalist founder Murray Rothbard.

A former member
Post #: 718

Anarchism is generally defined as the political philosophy which holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful,[1][2] or alternatively as opposing authority and hierarchical organization in the conduct of human relations.[3][4][5][6][7][8] Proponents of anarchism, known as "anarchists", advocate stateless societies based on non-hierarchical[3][9][10] voluntary associations.[11][12]

There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[13]
Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism.[2]
Strains of anarchism have been divided into the categories of social and individualist anarchism or similar dual classifications.[14][15]
Anarchism is often considered a radical left-wing ideology,[16][17] and much of anarchist economics and anarchist legal philosophy reflect anti-statist interpretations of communism, collectivism, syndicalism or participatory economics.
However, anarchism has always included an individualist strain, egoist strain, and free market strain.[18][19][20]
Some individualist anarchists are also socialists or communists[21][22] while some anarcho-communists are also individualists.[23][24]

Guest Post: The Master Narrative Nobody Dares Admit: Centralization Has Failed

The Master Narrative Nobody Dares Admit: Centralization Has Failed
All centralized systems, open and shadow alike, act as heavy taxes on the society and economy. This is why they cannot compete with the forces of networked decentralization.

The primary "news" narrative may be the failure of the euro, but the master narrative is much, much bigger: centralization has failed.
The failure of Europe's "ultimate centralization project" is but a symptom of a global failure of centralization.

Though many look at China's command-economy as proof that the model of Elite-controlled centralization is a roaring success, let's check in on China's stability and distribution of prosperity in 2021 before declaring centralization an enduring success.
The pressure cooker is already hissing and the flame is being turned up every day.

What's the key driver of this master narrative? Technology, specifically, the Internet.
Gatekeepers and centralized authority are no match for decentralized knowledge and decision-making. Once a people don't need to rely on a centralized authority to tell them what to do, the centralized authority becomes a costly impediment, a tax on the entire society and economy.

In a cost-benefit analysis, centralization once paid significant dividends. Now it is a drag that only inhibits growth and progress. The Eurozone is the ultimate attempt to impose an intrinsically inefficient and unproductive centralized authority on disparate economies, and we are witnessing its spectacular implosion.

Centralization acts as a positive feedback, i.e. a self-reinforcing loop that leads to a runaway death spiral.
Centralize the entire banking sector into five corporations and guess what happens?
They buy access to the highly centralized power centers of the Federal government.
Like the HIV virus, centralized concentrations of capital like the five "too big to fail" banks disrupt the regulatory "immune response" that was supposed to control them.

This feedback between centralized capital and centralized government cannot be controlled by more rules and regulations--the two partners in domination will subvert or bypass any such feeble attempts with shadow systems of governance and control of the very sort we now see dominating economies and governments around the globe.

A former member
Post #: 719

Starlings are small to medium-sized passerine birds in the family Sturnidae.
The name "Sturnidae" comes from the Latin word for starling, sturnus.
Many Asian species, particularly the larger ones, are called mynas, and many African species are known as glossy starlings because of their iridescent plumage.
Starlings occur naturally in the Old World, from Europe, Asia and Africa, to northern Australia and the islands of the tropical Pacific.
Several European and Asian species have been introduced to these areas as well as North America, Hawaii and New Zealand, where they generally compete for habitat with native birds and are considered to be invasive species.
The starling species familiar to most people in Europe and North America is the European Starling, and throughout much of Asia and the Pacific the Common Myna is indeed common.


A former member
Post #: 720

The world is becoming increasingly interconnected and open.
All bets are off as to what openness, collaboration and mutual understanding in an ultra-connected world will mean for human potential.
TEDGlobal's "Radical Openness" theme this year is designed to explore some questions in this journey -- with radical thinkers and an open approach to the boundless inventiveness of the human mind.


Don Tapscott: Four principles for the open world

A former member
Post #: 721

Ernst Friedrich "Fritz" Schumacher (16 August 1911 – 4 September 1977) was an internationally influential economic thinker, statistician and economist in Britain, serving as Chief Economic Advisor to the UK National Coal Board for two decades.[1]
His ideas became popularized in much of the English-speaking world during the 1970s. He is best known for his critique of Western economies and his proposals for human-scale, decentralized and appropriate technologies.
According to The Times Literary Supplement, his 1973 book Small Is Beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered is among the 100 most influential books published since World War II.[2] and was soon translated into many languages, bringing him international fame.
Schumacher's basic development theories have been summed up in the catch-phrases Intermediate Size and Intermediate Technology.
In 1977 he published A Guide For The Perplexed as a critique of materialist scientism and as an exploration of the nature and organization of knowledge.
Together with long-time friends and associates like Professor Mansur Hoda, Schumacher founded the Intermediate Technology Development Group (now Practical Action) in 1966.

Small Is Beautiful: Economics As If People Mattered is a collection of essays by British economist E. F. Schumacher. The phrase "Small Is Beautiful" came from a phrase by his teacher Leopold Kohr.[1] It is often used to champion small, appropriate technologies that are believed to empower people more, in contrast with phrases such as "bigger is better".

First published in 1973, Small Is Beautiful brought Schumacher's critiques of Western economics to a wider audience during the 1973 energy crisis and emergence of globalization. The Times Literary Supplement ranked Small Is Beautiful among the 100 most influential books published since World War II.[2] A further edition with commentaries was published in 1999.[3]

Small Is Beautiful received the prestigious award Prix Européen de l'Essai Charles Veillon in 1976.

A former member
Post #: 722
print ones own ciruit boards..

print one's own 3d printer with one's own 3d printer

A former member
Post #: 723

only thing needed is too be able to provide the desired type of metal to be used in powdered form to the 3d printer.

Just, need to print a device which does that. A device which takes perhaps aluminum cans and then produces a useful alumnum printable powder which then can be used in the 3d printer which prints using various metalic inks.

Selective laser sintering (SLS) is an additive manufacturing technique that uses a high power laser (for example, a carbon dioxide laser) to fuse small particles of plastic, metal (direct metal laser sintering), ceramic, or glass powders into a mass that has a desired 3-dimensional shape.
The laser selectively fuses powdered material by scanning cross-sections generated from a 3-D digital description of the part (for example from a CAD file or scan data) on the surface of a powder bed.
After each cross-section is scanned, the powder bed is lowered by one layer thickness, a new layer of material is applied on top, and the process is repeated until the part is completed.

RepRap Laser Good Print

Selective Laser Sintering Part 6
I thought I'd take a second to make a quick post about some of the interesting bits of the new open selective laser sintering printer that I've been designing in between finishing up my dissertation.
(I'm also looking for an interesting postdoc (or maybe the right industry job, if it's research oriented and challenging) -- if you're interested in learning more, please have a look at my graphical portfolio / academic CV.
My background is pretty diverse, and I'm quite interested in branching into cognitive robotics, rapid prototyping, and potentially making these technologies a little "smarter", more accessible, inexpensive, or otherwise more capable. )

A former member
Post #: 745

TEDxRepubliqueSquare - Etienne Chouard - Chercher la cause des causes

In 2005, before the European referundum, while teaching economics and law, Etienne Chouard looked closely to the draft version of the European Constitution.

What he discovered changed him forever. He woke up, policatilly.

Since then, and independently from any political organizations, he warns us against our apathy, denounces our responsibility and wants to restore the true meaning of democracy.

His motto : a Constitution written by citizens and representatives selected by sortition.

A former member
Post #: 746
More about making a new type of constitution.
What is the best way for us humans to organize?

mostly in French
Etienne Chouard looked wiki constitution

Democracy in America is stalled.

The road to calling a convention is long, difficult, and fraught.
But on many issues where Congress won't pass real reforms—like Wall Street regulation, government spending, immigration, campaign finance, and countless others—an Article V Convention offers a way forward.

We aim to show how an Article V Convention can be an avenue towards reform on a range of issues.
We want to show how a convention might work by sponsoring mock conventions in schools and communities around the country.
Ultimately, we want to gather reformers around the country to raise the call for a convention.

@Google: Lawrence Lessig: Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress—and a Plan to Stop It

Conference on the Constitutional Convention: Lawrence Lessig Keynote

A former member
Post #: 764

Interesting talk; Gar Alperovitz's states that America is in it's most imporant moment in history.

He talks about how we, American's, are going to find agreement and cope through this transition from
what he describes as 'the old way of doing things' to the 'new way of doing things'.

Gar Alperovitz states that this 'change' will happen from us.

Gar Alperovitz's Green Party Keynote: We Are Laying Groundwork for "Next Great Revolution"

Gar Alperovitz (born May 5, 1936) is Lionel R. Bauman Professor of Political Economy at the University of Maryland, College Park Department of Government and Politics.
He is a former Fellow of King's College, Cambridge; a founding Fellow of Harvard’s Institute of Politics;
a Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies;
and a Guest Scholar at the Brookings Institution.
Alperovitz also served as a Legislative Director in the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, and as a Special Assistant in the Department of State.
Alperovitz is a founding principal of The Democracy Collaborative at the University of Maryland, and a member of the board of directors for the New Economics Institute.[1][2]

Powered by mvnForum

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy