addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwchatcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrosseditemptyheartfacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgoogleimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinmagnifying-glassmailminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1outlookpersonplusprice-ribbonImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruseryahoo

Re: [atheists-27] Atheist or Bright?

From: Martin
Sent on: Saturday, August 10, 2013 2:06 PM
Don,

Unfortunately the term "skeptic" became tainted about 3 years ago when cunning lobbyists and pseudo-libertarian "think-tank" dwellers usurped the term to create the global warming skeptic, and suckered in many well-intentioned but perhaps somewhat gullible "skeptics" along the way. And, less troubling, but also a distraction is that all kinds of conspiracy theorists proudly use the skeptic label - skeptical we ever landed on the moon, skeptical that Al-Quaeda committed the 9/11 atrocities, skeptical that the Holocaust occurred, ugh...

Martin.

On 08/09/[masked]:24 PM, Don Wharton wrote:
Something that I am noticing about this discussion is that no one is citing skeptic as a major term of identity.  I think most of us would be comfortable using the term to describe our approach to claims that are not fully confirmed by science.  However, there seems to be a bigger cultural difference than the with the other terms we are discussing.
 
There are a handful of topics that skeptics tend to focus on that we will seldom cover,  UFOs, homeopathy, anti-vaccination activists, etc.  We might be in agreement with them on all of their favorite issues but for some reason we don't find these topics as compelling.
 
Don
 
 
 

From: Mathew Goldstein <[address removed]>
To: [address removed]
Sent: Friday, August 9,[masked]:50 PM
Subject: Re: [atheists-27] Atheist or Bright?

If the labels are humanist, freethinker, empiricist, and secularist then they are at least partially focused on behavior related attitudes.  However, labels like atheist, bright, theist, metaphysical supernaturalist, and metaphysical naturalist, are primarily 'how the universe works' conclusions.  The latter conclusions are related to the former attitudes because particular conclusions may favor some attitudes over conflicting attitudes. Some people start with their attitudes and base their conclusions about how our universe works on their attitudes instead of the other way around.  Yes, behaviors are important.  But our conclusions about how the universe works are just as important because they are the proper initial foundation for everything else, including for our behavior related attitudes. It is our best fit with the available evidences conclusions that should come first chronologically.

On Aug 9, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Martin Snowden <[address removed]> wrote:

Mathew,

What you are talking about is simply the passive internal understanding the world, on which I expect many on this list are in agreement. But in this discussion of labels what is more important is the active way we wish to behave in society, and of course how we wish society to behave to us.

Martin.

On 08/09/[masked]:59 PM, Mathew Goldstein wrote:
Yes, people do appear to choose their beliefs about how the world works at least partially for the sake of self-identity or various such social or psychological reasons. However, when we assert that an entity x exists, or an event y happened, we are actually making a factual claim about how the world works, we are saying x really exists in our best judgement. The only way to properly justify such beliefs is on a best overall (inferred) fit with the available empirical evidences.  Anyone who allows any other considerations to play a role in their reaching such conclusions about how the universe works is either making an epistemological mistake, or is knowingly being dishonest with themself and/or with others.

On Aug 9, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Brian L mailto:[address removed] wrote:

Socially, many seem to choose an identity label stating that they are well-meaning
--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
http://www.meetup.com/DC-Atheists/
This message was sent by Mathew Goldstein ([address removed]) from DC Atheists Meetup.
To learn more about Mathew Goldstein, visit his/her member profile: http://www.meetup.com/DC-Atheists/members/49395042/
Set my mailing list to email me

As they are sent
http://www.meetup.com/DC-Atheists/list_prefs/?pref=1

In one daily email
http://www.meetup.com/DC-Atheists/list_prefs/?pref=2

Don't send me mailing list messages
http://www.meetup.com/DC-Atheists/list_prefs/?pref=0
Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | [address removed]






--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Mathew Goldstein ([address removed]) from DC Atheists Meetup.
To learn more about Mathew Goldstein, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | [address removed]






--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Don Wharton ([address removed]) from DC Atheists Meetup.
To learn more about Don Wharton, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | [address removed]

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy