Dr. Abby Hafer, Curry College
Intelligent Design (ID) claims to be science. When you read papers by ID authors, they often use scientific-sounding language. However, the papers often seem to rely too heavily on argumentation and lack the use of, or even reference to, data. In this talk, I quantify this problem in a carefully dispassionate way and come up with some very interesting results. I also discuss the Discovery Institute's fundamental antipathy to science, as revealed by the Wedge document.