addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1light-bulblinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Response Policy Zones (DNS RPZ)

From: Mike B.
Sent on: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 1:02 PM
Forwarding from another LUG, good read:

Very interesting. I don't think the technical aspects are all that difficult, but the reputation of the cooperating or say, authoritative servers, is more questionable. I do trust the ISC though, at least they have never given me a reason not to. That and I just love to read RFCs :), mostly because I enjoy knowing that Micro$oft has a tendency to do whatever they want regardless.


On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Dazed_75 <xxx> wrote:
I wondered what people here might think about this idea about reputation considerations in a DNS,2845,2367566,00.asp

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy