Meh. Some got a bit too emotional and ideological with their opinions and condemnation of others. In the first group, there seemed to be more reflection and people were more open with their experiences, nuanced, and less inclined to prove others wrong or shame them. There were a few people at the meeting who didn't speak because they were uncomfortable of the reactions. Those who had strong opinions on this made their opinions known and it became less of an open exploration of the topic. Was a lively discussion. I don't think it needed to be that way though. Ideas could have been exchanged without the climate created of the moralizing.
— MJ