i don't know, doesn't that leave open the possibility of breaking old code that is migrated up?
and by "break" i mean: make code that didn't compile before magically and un-intentionally compile?
I'd suspect that was the reasoning behind that - but it is a good point, i didn't even *think* of it when i did the questionnaire. Sigh, i'm such a sheeple.
On 8 August[masked]:20, Alex Anderson <[address removed]>
It's a shame there's not a third option in the survey - if a method
body is declared in an interface, then surely it could be understood
implicitly to be a default implementation?
This message was sent by Alex Anderson ([address removed]) from LJC - London Java Community.
To learn more about Alex Anderson, visit his/her member profile: http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/members/10287125/