Mailing List Archive

Subject Sender Date
Re: [ljc] Single sign on - Active directory - Hi Richard, Check this out:  https://github.com/michail-nik­olaev/springsecurity3-activedi­rectory-ntlm-test   I beli Jaromir H. Nov 7, 2013 5:27 PM
Re: [ljc] Single sign on - Active directory - Preview not available Stephen M. Nov 7, 2013 5:22 PM
Re: [ljc] Single sign on - Active directory - Assuming that you're referring to a servlet-based webapp here, the usual solution is to go with JAAS and container-managed authentication. LDAP *is* part of the picture here if you had a username/password that you wan Kevin W. Nov 7, 2013 5:19 PM
Re: [ljc] Single sign on - Active directory - Presumimg you are looking to pass windows credentials for single singon. Kerberos could be used to achieve this single singon from browser to the webapp running on app server with kerberos configuration to window domain. Jatin Nov 7, 2013 5:00 PM
Re: [ljc] Single sign on - Active directory - From my old J2EE days I recall Spring Security and Apache Shiro at least being able to authenticate to LDAP (which AD is nominally a super-set of).  I remember having to jump a few hoops with later versions of AD, but I could usually get t Martijn V. Nov 7, 2013 4:43 PM
Re: [ljc] Single sign on - Active directory - On older systems, this was done using NTLM (if I remember), on newer systems it's kerberos and friends, in all cases I've found it a pest to implement and maintain. I've done this with apache shiro and acegi ( David D. Nov 7, 2013 4:38 PM
Re: [ljc] Single sign on - Active directory - Hello Richard, You should use your container's security domain and set it up to use SPNEGO and set your application to use that security domain. Hope that helps. On Nov 7, Ingo H. Nov 7, 2013 4:35 PM
Single sign on - Active directory - Hello, In my web app i need to implement single sign on to authenticate against Active directory for windows users. Users should be able to log on to their computers and not require to login to my web app since they h Richard N. Nov 7, 2013 3:56 PM
What to Expect: LJC: Android for Java Developers - Tonight - Thursday 7th November 2013 - doors opening at 18:15 - Anji C. Nov 7, 2013 10:14 AM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Barry C. Nov 6, 2013 3:59 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Wesley H. Nov 6, 2013 2:51 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Adam R. Nov 6, 2013 2:49 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 06:58 -0500, Trisha wrote: > Hi Eleanor, > > I know not all employers look at GitHub, but a GitHub profile is a way to > show you can "code your way out of a paper bag", and as an employer it's a > lot easier and lighter-weight Russel W. Nov 6, 2013 2:28 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Stephen M. Nov 6, 2013 2:25 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Obviously the first thing I would is to write an acceptance test describing what out of the bag means... :) On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Barry Cranford < Colin V. Nov 6, 2013 1:52 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Is this a hackathon we want to organise? A bit like silent pairing - a bag over your head, solve a problem.  GO! On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Kevin Wright < Colin V. Nov 6, 2013 1:50 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - It has nothing to do with coding ability though, it's the spiky hair :) On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Barry Cranford < Colin V. Nov 6, 2013 1:42 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - You created a meme - be proud! On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Colin Soho Cobra Vipurs < [address removed] robert a. Nov 6, 2013 1:21 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Colin Vipurs - The man that actually CAN code his way out of a paper bag... On 6 Nov 2013, Barry C. Nov 6, 2013 1:16 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Mental note to myself: Create a project on GitHub named "PaperBag", put some awesome code in it. How many can code their way *in* a pape Kevin W. Nov 6, 2013 12:42 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - I've seen a number of tech interviewing tactics, from write-code-alone-in-a-room to write-code-on-a-whiteboard-wit­h-others.  I will always prefer to interview with some form of tech test because recruiting is expensive - from CV screeni Gemma S. Nov 6, 2013 12:33 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Am I going to regret phrasing it that way forever more? On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Trisha < trisha.gee@gmail. Colin V. Nov 6, 2013 12:05 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Hi Eleanor, I know not all employers look at GitHub, but a GitHub profile is a way to show you can "code your way out of a paper bag", and as an employer it's a lot easier and lighter-weight for me to check Trisha Nov 6, 2013 11:57 AM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Bit late to the party I know, but I have had a bunch of tech tests to do ;-) Eleanor M. Nov 6, 2013 10:47 AM
Winner Selected - 48 HR RAFFLE: Win a free ticket to Code Mesh 2013 (3-5 Dec 2013) - Hi everyone, We have selected a winner for the recent LJC raffle: Anji C. Nov 6, 2013 9:40 AM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Minor point, but I don't think it is valid to refer to Java EE as JEE. I know Arun Gupta used to correct people on this po Stephen S. Nov 5, 2013 9:49 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - > > +1 on this. > > On a side note, ask Java developers with 10 years experience: > 1. Have you used threading? > 2. Do you think that a method should run in its own thread unless there is a good reason for it not to? > > Most will say we shouldn Linesh Nov 5, 2013 5:27 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Stephen M. Nov 5, 2013 2:25 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - On 5 November 2013 12:26, Alex Anderson wrote: > On 5 November 2013 14:21, Linesh wrote: >> >> +1 on this. >> >> On a side note, ask Java developers with 10 years experience: >> 1. Have you used threading Adam R. Nov 5, 2013 1:19 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Hi, Is that the w Richard W. Nov 5, 2013 12:30 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - That's a terrible second question, if asked I'd have to challenge the assumption that thread boundaries must correlate with method boundaries :) Ask about the problems that can arise with threading and if locks+th Kevin W. Nov 5, 2013 12:26 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Trisha Nov 5, 2013 12:22 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - On 5 November 2013 14:21, Linesh wrote: > > +1 on this. > > On a side note, ask Java developers with 10 years experience: > 1. Have you used threading? > 2. Do you think that a method should run in its own thread unless there is Alex A. Nov 5, 2013 12:01 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - +1 on this. On a side note, ask Java developers with 10 years experience: 1. Have you used threading? 2. Do you think that a method should run in its own thread unless there is a good reason for it not to? Most will s Linesh Nov 5, 2013 8:27 AM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Wesley H. Nov 5, 2013 12:59 AM
RE: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Joshua W. Nov 4, 2013 11:44 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Michal R. Nov 4, 2013 11:33 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available robert a. Nov 4, 2013 10:08 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Unfortunately we can't do any sort of correlation, we are locked in to Meetups rules on things like that. Though I Barry C. Nov 4, 2013 5:04 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Aha. This kind of thing, I think of as more of a "thorough interview" than a "technical test". A little bit of pairing during the interview process is great and I relish it (as Joel G. Nov 4, 2013 4:57 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - "but without technical tests how do you avoid ending up working with, and I can't think of a better way of phrasing this, people who can't code their way out of a paper bag?" I think it is a bit of an exaggeration to say there are "de Joseph O. Nov 4, 2013 4:56 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Hi all, Is it possible to Abraham Marín P. Nov 4, 2013 4:05 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - The initial poll results seem to be in-line with my feelings about tests, perhaps this will bring some change. tl;dr; testing programming language skills is a bit like testing language skills. You can either focus o Michal R. Nov 4, 2013 3:26 PM
Events from our Partners - LJC - Hi everyone, I hope you’re all doing well and have had a good start to the week. Last week we manned the LJC booth at JAX conference and managed to speak to a few developers that had not signed up to the LJC so firstly, welcome to our new Samantha h. Nov 4, 2013 2:59 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Colin V. Nov 4, 2013 2:05 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Haha! Obviously " much more successful in recruiting Java contractors that are useless to us." should have been " Adam R. Nov 4, 2013 2:02 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - IMHO -  At the organisation that I have been contracting with for the last 2+ years, there was almost no technical questions in the interview and certainly no technical test. My role here is to lead the imple Adam R. Nov 4, 2013 2:00 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available user 3. Nov 4, 2013 1:17 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - I think it's worth distinguishing between the types of test that are out there beyond timed vs untimed. There's quite a bit of difference between an Stephen H. Nov 4, 2013 12:50 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Stephen M. Nov 4, 2013 12:39 PM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Joseph O. Nov 4, 2013 11:56 AM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Samir T. Nov 4, 2013 11:43 AM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Barry C. Nov 4, 2013 11:38 AM
What to Expect - The Bleeding Edge - Tonight 4/11/13 at 18:15 - Anji C. Nov 4, 2013 11:38 AM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Colin V. Nov 4, 2013 11:35 AM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Joel G. Nov 4, 2013 11:30 AM
Re: [ljc] Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Preview not available Stephen M. Nov 4, 2013 10:14 AM
Tech tests - love them or hate them? - Good morning all, For those of you that have changed jobs in the last few years, you will probably have Barry C. Nov 4, 2013 10:10 AM
Open Conference tickets - Hi, Told you they'd go quickly - there are only 24 tickets remaining of the original 150! Grab one of the last few now and join us on what I hope to be the best open conference yet! -> Simon M. Nov 4, 2013 9:51 AM
#AdoptOpenJDK at #OpenFest and Bulgarian JUG - Mani Nov 4, 2013 12:08 AM
Open Conference Ticket update - Hey, We're well over half sold out already, just in a couple of days! (Told you they'd go quickly!) There are actually only 61 spots remaining of the 150 capacity (at the time of writing). There will be n Simon M. Oct 31, 2013 10:42 AM
RE: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - Malcolm L. Oct 29, 2013 2:40 PM
Re: [ljc] Open Conference 2013: Registration is Open - Don't forget you can join the new [address removed] group for new speakers in tech! Cheers, Martijn Martijn V. Oct 29, 2013 11:23 AM
Re: [ljc] Open Conference 2013: Registration is Open - I hope that everyone who went to the Speaker's Clinic last night will sign up!  You're now well on the way to being a conference speaker, and the open conference has nice short lightning talks that you can practice your skills on. Trisha Oct 29, 2013 10:54 AM
Re: [ljc] Open Conference 2013: Registration is Open - That should have read not appearing. Regards Michael On 29 October 2013 08:49, Michael Bateman < Michael Oct 29, 2013 8:59 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - If you're looking at a more "mathsy" solution (and matlab integration suggests you are), then you might want to check out processing.org as well. Kevin W. Oct 29, 2013 8:52 AM
Re: [ljc] Open Conference 2013: Registration is Open - Hi Simon, I have registered and paypal has apparently taken my money but I am appearing on the list. Michael On 29 October 20 Michael Oct 29, 2013 8:49 AM
Open Conference 2013: Registration is Open - Hi The subject line pretty much sums it up... Registration is now open! Simon M. Oct 29, 2013 7:44 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - Many thanks Malcolm. MATLAB support word be great as the current system uses that, could you point me to info as to Mike B. Oct 28, 2013 8:49 PM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;­} Malcolm L. Oct 28, 2013 7:24 PM
Re: [ljc] A question for the Java thought leaders... - I think you could get 'two birds with one stone' here Barry, and ask a question about how Daniel B. Oct 28, 2013 6:46 PM
Winners selected: 48 HR RAFFLE: Two tickets for NoSQL Search Roadshow London 2013 - Anji C. Oct 28, 2013 5:21 PM
Re: [ljc] A question for the Java thought leaders... - Hey Barry, Like the idea of the interviews - The GDC MaM interviews are always very interesting to hear how others weave their way through a career. I'm not sure I'm a Java Thought Leader, but I& Simon M. Oct 28, 2013 3:10 PM
What to Expect: LJC: New Speakers Clinic / Trisha Gee - Tonight 28/10/13 - 18:00 - Anji C. Oct 28, 2013 11:53 AM
Re: [ljc] Benefits of getting involved in OSS - I'll contact you off list about dates/times. A lightning talk would last for 5-7 minutes, Barry C. Oct 28, 2013 11:51 AM
Re: [ljc] Benefits of getting involved in OSS - I could do, how long would the talk be and when would it be? On 28 October 2013 09:27, Barry Cranford < bc@r Adam R. Oct 28, 2013 10:00 AM
A question for the Java thought leaders... - Hey guys, As I'm sure you're all aware, JAX London is now upon us again. Sam will be manning (or Barry C. Oct 28, 2013 9:44 AM
Re: [ljc] Benefits of getting involved in OSS - That's very interesting Adam! Would you be open to giving a lightning talk about how you went about that? I'm sure it would be very i Barry C. Oct 28, 2013 9:25 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Snowcode 2014! w00t! NoSQL and POWDA! Developer snow unconference at La Cluzaz - I'm confused. When I look up snow code 2014 on meetup.com I see the following event: @sleepyfox Oct 27, 2013 12:56 PM
Re: [ljc] Benefits of getting involved in OSS - Hi Barry, First question, how do I get on the list to present my project at a meet-a-project night? Secondly, a positive experience is obviously work that comes out of an Open Source project achie Adam R. Oct 27, 2013 11:32 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Novice Speakers' Clinic - Just a quick reminder, my Novice Speakers' clinic is tomorrow at 6.15pm.  At the moment, there's one spot left, but if you've signed up and realise that you can't make it, please change your RSVP in case other people want to Trisha Oct 27, 2013 10:52 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 16:00 -0400, Mike Burton wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm quoting to develop some software that needs to: > - Have a slick UI, > - Display charts (not too fancy, 2D with plot points and coloured areas) > - Run on client ie not brow Russel W. Oct 27, 2013 9:49 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 16:00 -0400, Mike Burton wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm quoting to develop some software that needs to: > - Have a slick UI, > - Display charts (not too fancy, 2D with plot points and coloured areas) > - Run on client ie not brow Russel W. Oct 27, 2013 9:49 AM
Re: Snowcode 2014! w00t! NoSQL and POWDA! Developer snow unconference at La Cluzaz - Hey guys, Justin is having trouble getting this message to the group, so I have said I'll forward it out for him.& Barry C. Oct 27, 2013 7:16 AM
RE: [ljc] Benefits of getting involved in OSS - Hi Barry, I ca Mani Oct 26, 2013 6:32 PM
Benefits of getting involved in OSS - Good morning all, We are preparing a lightning talk around the Meet a Project initiative to try and enc Barry C. Oct 26, 2013 9:08 AM
RE: [ljc] Fwd: Open source project to learn JDK 8 features. - Dennis H. Oct 25, 2013 11:38 PM
Re: [ljc] Atlassian Sponsoring the LJC - That's awesome news! Congrats and well done to Atlassian for supporting the community! Simon M. Oct 25, 2013 4:59 PM
Atlassian Sponsoring the LJC - Hey guys, I just wanted to give a quick shout out to Atlassian, who have just confirmed that they will Barry C. Oct 25, 2013 10:36 AM
Call for Swag! - HI All, I hope everyone is having Samantha h. Oct 24, 2013 11:20 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - If you are sure you don't need/want it to run on a browser, my suggestion is the Eclipse Rich Client Platform. Mature, lots of functionality. Or just Eclipse SWT/Jface if you are looking to do something simpler. As for chart librar Bruno M. Oct 23, 2013 1:14 PM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - Hi Mike I would say JavaFX 2.x if your client and audience has the freedom to use Java SE 7. JavaFX has a built graph components that can handle line graphs, plots. Have a look at the JavaFX Ensemble application that is part of the distribution. You Peter P. Oct 23, 2013 11:08 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - Just to add if you are insistent in doing it in a non-webby way, then I have had very good experience of building client side apps on top of the NetBeans platform in the past (remember it is not just an IDE but a framework++ for making GUI Adam R. Oct 23, 2013 10:51 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - Sorry to respond to a question with a question but why do you want the client to be stand-alone rather than browser based? There are some good reasons why you might require this and they are likely to help with any advice. e.g. do you have robert a. Oct 23, 2013 10:05 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - ...And if that becomes an option, I'd use Highcharts for some really great looking (and easy to construct) javascript charts James B. Oct 23, 2013 9:39 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - I agree with Martijn - I'm not sure why you'd chose anything else really. On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Martijn Verburg < Colin V. Oct 23, 2013 9:31 AM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - Even if it has to run on the client, I would most likely still build it as a web-app and just embed a webserver in my app. Gives you lots of scope for future expansion onto the web or mobile. Adam R. Oct 22, 2013 11:02 PM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - In my opinion, you dont need any java framework , I would choose any pure javascript and html ready made component ( charts and stuff) and use backbone.js for feeding it by JSON from a REST controller (using Jersey for example). I think tha Sleiman J. Oct 22, 2013 10:05 PM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - Maybe im a bit old fashioned now as its a couple of years since my last large swing project, but I would probably go for a Swing Ui using Jfreechart for the charting. There are many open source extensions to swing that help Dave C. Oct 22, 2013 9:47 PM
Re: [ljc] Re: Which Java Client Technology? - JavaFX (or JVMLanguageFX of your choice) is a strong candidate here. On Tuesday, 22 October 2013, Mike Burton wrote: Hi Folks, I& Martijn V. Oct 22, 2013 9:41 PM

Our Sponsors

  • Our Blog

    Read the latest news from the LJC

  • RecWorks Ltd

    Fixing Tech Recruitment using the Power of Community

  • jClarity

    Java/JVM Performance Analysis Tools & mentoring for Java related matters

  • LJC Aggrity

    Our LJC Aggrity site contains blog posts from our members

  • LJC Book Club

    Our Book club with book reviews from our members

  • Devoxx UK

    Java Community Conference, in collaboration with the LJC 12/13 Jun 14

  • SkillsMatter

    "Host, help organise, promote, film many of our meetings."

  • Atlassian

    See here for details - http://www.atlassian.com/

  • Packt Publishing

    A publishing company specializing on specific technologies and solutions

  • Java.Net

    We are an official Java User Group recognised by Oracle's JUG program

  • JRebel

    Free 3 month J-Rebel license.

  • O'Reilly

    40% discount on printed books and 50% on e-books.

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy