Former poker player turned programmer.
I played online poker for a living for about a year and a half after graduating from college, where I studied physics. I'm now an engineer at a New York startup.
I'm not really sure what "completely objective" means in this context. For example, how would you rate a highly exploitive player's skill? Or the skill of highly balanced poker bot? My naive definition of poker skill would be something like "average ability to maximize expectation weighted across a range of opponent strategies". A balanced bot would have a fairly uniform expectation vs a spectrum of strategies, whereas an exploitive player might do well vs some strategies but poorly vs others. Another question: part of poker skill is certainly being able to *perceive* what your opponent's strategy is. How will you measure that component?
Sign in to post a Greeting.
Log in to Meetup with your Facebook account.