align-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcamerachatcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-crosscrosseditfacebookglobegoogleimagesinstagramlocation-pinmagnifying-glassmailmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1outlookpersonplusImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartwitteryahoo

What to do about Red Rocks?

From: Russell D.
Sent on: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 9:05 PM

Hello OSM-CO,


Don’t know about you but I had some time ago seen how Red Rocks was tagged (the rocks as building=yes), and decided to look the other way as I also have wanted to get rocks to render (but not nearly as important rocks, so I used appropriate tags).  However, it can only be ignored so long and recently a note (yes, that new feature that may become a pain) appeared pointing out this tagging for the renderer scheme.  Anyway, I have made an attempt to correct the situation (look at Park Cave Rock and its companion near the southern end); it’s not ideal as it requires a relationship to ‘make them appear’, but is probably better/more accurate than using natural=sand (as someone else did on one lone rock); however I am up for suggestions or over the next week or so I will start ‘converting’ the remainder of the rocks to the scheme found here:


Of course this is still a ‘temporary’ solution – anyone want to addition petition for rock rendering?


Please send your feedback to me at [address removed] or through the OSM system – russdeffner




Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy