Philosophy Cafe - Cafe Philosophique Message Board › Kenneth Burke & Bakhtin: satire as a subset of comedy

Kenneth Burke & Bakhtin: satire as a subset of comedy

Chris W.
curieous
Albany, CA
Post #: 18
Under Files: I uploaded an article by Beth Bonnstetter that provides a good intro to Kenneth Burke's frames of acceptance/rejection (from his Attitudes toward history) using Mel Brook's Blazing Saddles.

[Disclaimer: All of this is hastily pulled together this morning and therefore is not an in depth study but more a pulling together of bits and pieces from past knowledge using the framework of Bonnstetter's article].


In ways that recall Goffman, Burke calls his frames of acceptance/rejection as ways that we see a situation (an "act" in Burke's dramatism). Burke's "poetic categories" for frames of acceptance {epic, tragedy, comedy} and frames of rejection {satire, burlesque, grotesque, elegy, and didactic}. Bonnstetter also uses Bahktin's notion of carnivale [from Rabelais and his world] where "all are considered equal" a kind of temporary suspension of social hierarchy.

Although I didn't have time to read Bergson I thought Burke & Bahktin's ideas could provide a useful framework to engage with Bergson. The contemporary satire such as Spike Lee's Bamboozled (2000) and Larry Charles' Borat (2006) co-written & starring Sascha Baron Cohen also offer fruitful films for discussing satire.

Although satire is only a subset of the comic, since it intensives human situations (Burkean acts), it can often use this magnification as a way of clarifying understanding.
Powered by mvnForum

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy