UNIFIED CONSCIOUSNESS

  • Needs a date

  • Needs a location

  • In The One, everything is continuous. We might talk about
    meditative and other spiritual (as opposed to supernatural) experiences and theories of Unified Consciousness.
    If everything is made up of energy and continuous,
    then why not consciousness? Perhaps precognition
    (no ghosts, just continuity of all that is) can show
    how consciousness reaches everywhere.

Join or login to comment.

  • Claire M.

    I have a venue if you are interested?

    Yesterday

    • Claire M.

      Sorry that posted too early. It's a large community hall in an arts centre in Hackney.

      Yesterday

  • Teresa H.

    Would really like to go to this but note that there is no date or meeting place! Any progress on that as yet?

    5 days ago

  • Kim

    Hi
    I have a large venue in central London to hold this event. I can set a date and organise it but would require participants to pay around £4/£5 each entry in order to pay security and reception staff in the evening. The reason for this is that security/first aid is required for a large group of people, so can't use the space without accounting for this. Would really like to get this going so let me know if you think it's okay to proceed guys...

    January 7

  • merry

    Ok, so Im an inconsistent Blogger. Ha!
    One Question, tho:
    Would you say that a consciousness
    that could see Past, Present, Future
    is omnipresent?
    I happen to think we live in a SimuItaneity.
    However, I reckon that some of you prefer
    separation into familiar movements to
    hear the question.
    Merry

    March 30

    • Glenn

      I have come to the conclusion that consciousness probably extends into all dimensions but is only aware (differentially between the conscious and subconscious states) of the 4 readily apparent ones, and then of course constrained by the limitations of location and sensory capability. So I would perhaps use the term 'omnipresent incognisant'.

      1 · May 7

    • Lance

      At the risk of going too far down the rabbit hole I would propose that consciousness IS dimension, location and sensation. That reality itself at it's core is one event (molecule isn't the right word) of consciousness travelling at infinite speed interacting with itself and creating through interference and dis-interference patterns; that which we call matter and experience.

      May 7

  • James K.

    Is anyone able to host this event? (set a place and date)

    April 30

  • Jane B.

    James Khan, I emailed you a month ago with details of 2 venues. Please could you let us know which one suits and then add the venue and a date/time so that this event can happen.

    1 · April 24

  • Nigel

    Anyone around this Sat for a friendly chat about anything to do with C, QM & C over tea or wine in NW3?

    April 1

    • lan B.

      Hello Nigel. Which aspects of any or all of the above particularly interests you? I couldn't help noticing an element of facetiousness in your profile in the members' margin on the Home Page!

      April 2

    • Lance

      Or maybe he just has a sense of humour along with his interest.

      1 · April 2

  • Lance

    When you finally do get a venue and date for this and similar meetups, it may be a good idea to re-announce them as I suspect many more people will sign up with a date confirmed. And BTW; the description etc is open to be changed by anyone at the moment. Not sure how you lock that off.

    March 31

  • merry

    By the way, were I not leaving for the States
    soon, I would dedicate a venue for meeting.
    Back in the Fall, but will still be interested
    in finally organizing Meeting. Unless one
    of you has already seen to it by then.

    March 30

  • Malcolm S.

    Ian, Ah, I understand: by my references to Maxwell's Demon, I seem to have given you the wrong impression. No, for me, Maxwell's Demon is a reducto absurdum that indicates that something is wrong with one of the initial assumptions, and that (by the laws of thermodynamics) it must be that Maxwell's Demon *must* consume energy (and that the absolute minimum that it must consume is k.T.ln(2) for every bit of information needed... hence my way of equating information to energy). So, yes, I totally agree that the human brain, and any other conscious hardware, must consume energy, too (partly during its information processing... but also in supporting consciousness, if that indeed turns out to be a real entity).

    March 28

    • lan B.

      We seem to agree in regard to every point then – this odd state of affairs hardly EVER happens to me! – apart from your proposed conflation of the Heisenberg Relations with the computational Halting Problem. Perhaps more interestingly, your concluding comment hints at consciousness not being "real", and I think that there's much to that, but it would take an entire, academic philosophical paper to pursue the point to an interesting conclusion. As hinted, I in fact did that 10 years ago, but since I'm not sure that it coincides with any directions which you personally would be interested in pursuing then I won't press on unless we exchange further comments which show that our respective positions in regard to the subject of consciousness are very closely aligned. [Contined ..]

      March 28

    • lan B.

      [Continued ..] Maybe we should swap insights gradually until it becomes apparent to both of us that we either share an identical viewpoint, or are at least amenable to the POSSIBILITY of a mutual accommodation of our views in response to insights from each other. (Sadly, experience shows that this hardly ever happens; I wait in hope!)

      March 28

  • merry

    Looking back at some comments, eg., Ian's,
    I see the Poet-Scientist divide. Not necessary.
    We are all naturally bigger than that. If we
    listen. Watch. Let our minds loose, rest, open
    I am not afraid of Rogers Penrose's 'scathing
    attack' on whatever, the greatest scientists -
    see Einstein's non-religious, non-irrational
    wisdoms on reality as so far beyond the hard
    things, eg., concrete, materialist self-diminishing.
    I will collect a few and place them here soon.
    Have been moving, so so busy.
    Irrationality is a confounding of high consciousness.
    Not an attempt to explain it. Just as arbitrary
    limitation is merely a cognitive diminishment of
    the continuity of consciousness, which it fails
    to encompass.
    We must all objectively observe ourselves far more closely to discover who we really are and what we can be. Religion, science, hope will not teach us this; but our divine consciousness will, if we remain
    detached. Ab
    .

    March 27

    • lan B.

      [Continued ..] because of one of his sketches of an apparently venerable, bearded, loin-clothed man sticking a pin into the phase space of the cosmos in order to single out that , ostensibly, Single point in 10^123 which hosts conditions fit for the evolution of life, to which he replied (first of all, and apprehensively: "Oh, dear! This isn't a question about .. about .. RELIGION, is it?"): .. And then: "Oh, That drawing was intended to represent God as a WOMAN, you see. What you can see isn't a long white BEARD; it was intended to portray LONG BLONDE HAIR".

      March 27

    • lan B.

      (Incidentally, I misremembered: Penrose's family religious affiliations are in fact QUAKER, and not Methodist. Sorry about that!)

      March 28

  • Malcolm S.

    Ian, I've just read your other comment addressed to me. No, I am no carbon fascist! Far from it. Indeed, I am exactly the opposite, believing that it could all be supported on any suitable hardware, using carbon (and DNA and synapses) or silicon (and transistors) or pneumatics, or hydraulics, or optics or transferred completely from the time domain of cause and effect, to the frequency domain (via Fourrier type transforms).

    As far as Turing machines are concerned, I suspect that the halting problem is just a restatement of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, and that uncertainty of computation termination is balanced against something else, like uncertainty of determinacy of the final result for example (as in genetic algorithms, for example), and that you can reduce one at the expence of increasing the other.

    March 28

    • lan B.

      INTERACTIONS between the crucial history-changing event-clusters in question and the present day are simply absent. Thus, “alternative histories” are, I (provisionally!) conclude, “real”, but in the sense of being POTENTIAL, rather than ACTUAL. With decoherence as a crucial explanatory component, one obtains the over-riding advantage of the many-world interpretation – i.e. absolute theoretical parsimony in virtue of strict adherence to the rules of quantum mechanics without any modifications or additions – without the often dismaying-seeming, bloated ontological excess.

      March 28

    • lan B.

      As for your other point in regard to the halting problem, well it seems to me that that is a purely MATHEMATICAL artefact. That is, it is not possible to determine the ultimate "destination" of a series of state-transitions within some machine table without actually ITERATING, right from the beginning. That would be akin to declaring with confidence which digit occupies some randomly nominated position within the decimal expansion of pi without having had firstly to determine the values of its predecessors! :-) )

      March 28

  • Malcolm S.

    Ah, no, I certainly don't believe that equating consciousness with energy means that the universe must therefore be conscious. Consciousness (if it really does exist, and is not just an arbitrary artefact) needs the appropriately structured hardware on which to run, in the same way that Maxwell's Demon does (when equating information with energy).

    March 27

    • lan B.

      [Continued .. ] (to put it politely; I sure hope that i have not inadvertently offended YOU if you happen to be an IT professional!) Of course, conscious systems -- indeed, ANY system whatsoever -- will when eventually constructed be capable of REPRESENTATION by some appropriately configured Turing machine, but won't happen to BE Turing machines. Well, that's my view anyway.

      March 27

    • lan B.

      (BTW I almost Forgot!): Malcolm, notwithstanding the fact that NO hardware is able to stand outside the Second law of Thermodynamics -- Isaac Asimov's 14-pp novella The Last Question is a brilliant, unputdownable tale which dramatises this very point, so for those who have somehow remained unaware of it during your lives-thus-far, I heartily recommend it -- and so y'ain't GONNA be able t'run Maxwell's Demon on NUTHIN', uh-huh, y'hear? .. Whereas, contrastingly, somehow, consciousness CAN BE run by SOME class of machine (!) The SCIENTIFIC question: which particular set of properties can we predicate of this class of machines in order that they can do the "job" of generating consciousness?

      March 27

  • merry

    Hi Malcolm,
    Interesting point you raise re consciousness requiring the 'appropriate structured hardware' to work.
    Were that true, we would never be aware of the
    'awareness of all things' and processes of which
    we are aware, often, at particularly 'sensitive'
    times, eg., when we or a loved one is in danger,
    when we are in love with who/whatever. Yes, we
    can be. 'in love' with morning, with music, with
    the wind. Human awareness/depth is far more expansive and more subtle than we give it/ourselves credit for.
    If artists, poets philosophers and everyone's
    'moment(s)' of sublime knowing, sensing, telepathy. inner reaching count for anything, then we must
    look beyond the concrete, fly within our own
    quantum world and out to the cosmos.
    We can. And do. In our best moments, in our
    most evolutionary moments.
    As an evolving species led, I suggest, by just
    these movements. We and Everything is The
    Center of the Universe.
    Merry

    March 27

    • lan B.

      Merry, I can SEE that you're not any kind of dismissive techno-blockhead, but perhaps one might sometimes be wary of "leaning too far the other way" and coming out with streams of non sequiturs. Sometimes within currents of historical thought concerning "the big questions" the logic of the situation and its associated empirical evidence mounts up in an unexpected and emotionally speaking unwelcome direction. If we are to elucidate whatever consciousness "is", we must, I think (since it is as much a NATURALISTIC phenomenon as is, say, plate tectonics) then I'm afraid that we are obliged to stick with being "hard-headed" in the sense of sticking accrately to the evolving logic as things become clearer, irresepective of the fact that we might find the outcome depressingly uncongenial. (No disparagement intended, believe me!)

      March 27

  • Malcolm S.

    Certainly, "energy is the common currency of the universe", so if consciousness is a real something that we can identify, then it must equate (somehow) to energy in the end. (Mass equates to energy via Einstein's E=m.c^2, and Information equates to energy via Maxwell's Demon, E=k.T.S.ln2)

    March 5

    • lan B.

      [Continued .. ] .......... but there is no doubt that our brains' TRACKING OF STIMULI -- including those generated WITHIN the subject's own body -- IS registered consciously. (That is, via the agency of the secondary/sensory qualities. See my comment immediately above.) .. Which leaves us in a bit of a theoretical quandary: what, therefore, is consciousness "for", in biological terms? It would seem to be redundant! (Me, I regard it as an evolutionary, Gouldian SPANDREL, but that would require a few hours for me to unpack, within the compass of a quite lengthy posting which might well have the effect of repelling everyone from this site on a permanent basis!)

      March 26

    • lan B.

      Cheers once again for the publicity, Malcolm :-)

      March 27

  • Malcolm S.

    Merry, I'm not sure I follow the logic of your second sentence. To me, the fact that I am aware of all these things is evidence that it must all be going on inside my hardware (i.e. me).

    March 27

  • merry

    Hi All, And Total Apologies for not responding sooner.
    Tho I love physics, art and politics, I am such a serious technophobe that I got locked out of comments til now.
    Re Jane's suggestion of a venune - Please help.
    Re: Mar, tin's Chalmers point on consciousness,
    Totally. My meditations taught me that
    energy is information, period. Which I suggest
    explains the very continuity of consciousness.
    And, all its so-called mysterious abilities.
    If I don't get locked out of the forum again, I will
    do all I can to get this meeting to happen.
    Thanks so much for all your thoughts and patience.
    Merry

    March 8

    • Jane B.

      Merry - hirespace are good for finding cheap venues (I use them for my meetup group). Perhaps people can pay, say, £5 at the door to help pay for the venue and drinks. Here are 2 venues which are central and cheap but there are other choices. St Silas Church Islington £20 ph - Father Rayner Wakelings's contact details Email: [masked] Phone:[masked] - http://hirespace.com/...­

      St James the Less, bethnal green £20 per hour. Alex's contact details are as follows: Email: [masked] Phone:[masked] - http://hirespace.com/...­ - no deposit needed – pay at time

      March 8

  • merry

    By the way, since energy is conscious, period.
    The next tree you pass will speak to you.
    If you watch.
    Tho I love physics, I am no scientist. Trained in painting, philosophy and theology, the atheist I am has learned that everything speaks to everything.
    Continuously.
    Someone said: 'Don't look at buildings. .....
    Watch them'.
    Watch a tree. Its very form, shape, dream is there
    for all to understand. The roots and trunk grow, wild
    and slow. to reach goal. Watch its branches, twigs, leaves twist and turn like our thoughts, cognition, brain - as if to say: Ok, Ill go this way ... No! that way is quicker, .... Oh, twist again to avoid ... shoot up that way .... to reach the sun, sky.
    Like thoughts aiming for a goal and the solid complexity of the brain, everything twists and turns
    forward and back and round finding the best way
    to reach its goal.
    Science, research, analysis teach us this. But ... its quicker than that ... all we need do is watch

    March 8

  • DOMINIC C.

    Not really interested in "spiritual things" as they tend to get a bit religious and irrational but each to his own
    Science and engineering I dig !!!!

    March 6

  • terence f.

    long nortice and London centricity needed

    March 5

  • Jane B.

    Merry, do you have a date and location for this meetup?

    March 4

    • Jane B.

      I know of a venue in Islington if that's of any use.

      March 4

  • merry

    I taught such meditative practice long ago;
    and would be willing to start the group with
    a talk and discussion on what Plotinus (3c
    Neo-Platonist) called The One. His theory of
    how The One (as opposed to a god) expanded outward into Nous (thought); Soul (emotion); Manifestation (us and all that is) in a 'joyful overflowing'.
    All thoughts on the wholly natural but often concealed abilities of precognition and telepathy (very politically incorrect concepts) can be
    discussed within the framework of a
    universal unity.

    February 27

Want to go?

Join and RSVP

39 going

  • samantha a.

    Of general interest, computer scientist and computational statisstician

  • Kim

    Kim Strong fascination with quanta mechanics, entanglement, hydrogen importance and speculation...­ more

  • Mae
  • Peter M.

    Hi, I'm interested to see to what extent QM reconciles with or determines consciousness.­

  • Cátia

    Heya! I'm Cátia. Looking forward to some great debates!!

  • Maxine A.

    Fascinated with energy healing, philosophy and meditation.

  • Robert

    Hi, I'm Robert, very interested in quantum theory, consciousness,­ and how they interact.... more

  • Meg Lee C.

    Like a lot of people nowadays I am fascinated by the subject of consciousness and it's relation... more

  • Annie

    Hi all these things are so fascinating to learn and think about. I'm an interested medical... more

  • Will D.

    Seeking food for thought!

  • omar h.

    omar, ex Muslim, living in UK. interested in neuroscience, mind and consciousness.­

  • May
  • Glenn

    I'll leave this to the meetings. But my interest in everything from Carlos Casteneda to Quantum... more

  • Mark H.

    free quant

  • Martin T.

    I have long been fascinated by quantum mechanics. Now I am doing a degree course at the open... more

  • M.G.Srikan­than

    I have been teaching neural networks and machine learning for many years. Currently I am... more

  • Liz
  • Oz
  • terence f.

    interested in the interface to the General Theory

  • eva
  • mark

    Hi I'm Mark. I'm an Engineer, originally from Australia. Recently moved back to London as I... more

  • Adam

    Fascinated by quantum weirdness.

  • Nigel

    Hugely interested uncollapsed wave function. Would love to know answer(s) or... more

  • Jane B.

    Hello, I'm in London and teach how to make skin and hair products.

4 not going

(See all)
  • Tracey

    Living Awake is a magical experience.

  • DOMINIC C.

    I have been interested in Astrnonomy and Cosmology all my life and would like to meet others... more

  • Malcolm S.

    The wheel, steam engine and computer are to the agricultural, industrial and information...­ more

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Imagine having a community behind you

Get started Learn more
Rafaël

We just grab a coffee and speak French. Some people have been coming every week for months... it creates a kind of warmth to the group.

Rafaël, started French Conversation Group

Start your Meetup today

Act now and get 50% off.
Until February 1.

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy