I wasnt as impressed with this article as some apparently were. My letter wasn't that appreciative of his courage. I'm getting a little irritated at the mollasses like speed of this movement. Not casting aspersions on anyone's hard work. Just getting fed up with the complacency of people in general.
Dear Mr. Rolland,
I just finished reading your article on 9/11 Truth and I guess I just have to be grateful for what I got.
There are scores of highly educated, credentialed people who have realized the truth behind this event. I know we all lead busy lives. And how easy is it to dismiss this topic. We don't have to do the research then, do we.
Don't you think a topic like this DEMANDS ��our time and attention? No matter how busy we are, no matter how much we care about what others think of us?
The truth about 9/11 has been painfully slow in emerging to the surface of the world public consciousness. You'll find that many outside our borders are already aware of the truth. But it is within these borders that we have had to fight a controlled media that is acting in unison with the perpetrators of 9/11 to camouflage the truth.
And so it is��even more important that anyone in the media come out and stand up for another, INDEPENDENT, investigation.
I hope you will at least educate yourself to the point where you can assist us in calling for that.
Hey guys, great news!!! One of our members, Peter, was featured on the very first page of citybeat this week with 9/11 truth. Pick up a copy, or read it online here:
It is a very fair representation of the movement, and it is important that we send a quick letter to the editor or to David Rolland thanking him for having the courage to discuss 9/11 truth. This is a huge deal, so many people are going to read this, and it is up to us to let him know how many of us support him. Our letters are important, because they will counter any negativity Dave will encounter.
Truths and conspiracies
by David Rolland
Peter Holmes had given up on waiting for me to return from a delicious chicken taco lunch last Wednesday and was walking down the hall when I got back. He'd been waiting in CityBeat's office lobby for the better part of an hour. I was about 20 strides from him when he asked, "Are you David Rolland?" When strung together like that, those have become four of the scariest words in the English language. And I've become so terrified of unannounced visitors that I probably formed my answer more like a question than a firm declaration: "Yes?"
I recognized Holmes' name when he said it; he was one of the handful of people who'd e-mailed me recently trying to get me to look into what really happened on Sept. 11, 2001. I'd pretty much ignored them, figuring that I lacked the time, government security clearance and advanced physics degree necessary to investigate their claims. But Holmes is nothing if not persistent. In his hand was a book he'd purchased for me, Debunking 9/11 Debunking, the fourth tome written about 9/11 by David Ray Griffin, a theologian and self-described latecomer to the "9/11 Truth" movement.
Holmes, a leader of San Diego's version of the movement and friendly fellow, told me he's long been reading my editorials critical of the Bush administration and considered me "fertile ground" for skepticism of the government's official story about Osama bin Laden, 19 box-cutter-wielding Muslim extremists and jet fuel burning so hot it melts steel. He no doubt was complimenting my willingness to question authority, but, of course, I took it to mean I possessed great potential for someday pounding out manifestos on an old Underwood typewriter by candlelight in a cabin in Idaho with bugs and bits of crackers in my beard.
I told him I'm not sure I can wrap my head around the notion that the Bush administration was complicit in the deliberate murder of what could have been tens of thousands of innocent Americans. Responsibility for the deaths of several thousand volunteer soldiers and hundreds of thousands of anonymous people in a far-off land is one thing, but this���I just really don't want to go there.
Holmes noted that the U.S. government has a history of provoking war by deception, and he said the official story just doesn't add up. Right there in the hallway, he spread his arms, making like an airplane, and swooped around in a loop, arguing that Hani Hanjour, the Saudi man the FBI says piloted American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon, was not skilled enough to perform such a difficult maneuver.
I offered my condolences about Rosie O'Donnell being the 9/11 Truth movement's celebrity champion before telling Holmes that I needed to get back to work, and he finally handed me the Griffin book���which is titled Debunking 9/11 Debunking because it seeks to debunk four particular publications that attempted to debunk the movement's claims. At least read the introduction, he urged, and he was off.
Skimming the intro couldn't cause too much pain, I figured, so on Sunday afternoon, I took a beach chair, towel and my new book to my favorite spot on the grass in Balboa Park. And there, amid the volleyball playing, lawn bowling and Frisbee tossing, I sat down and read the intro, wondering what the nearby frolickers would think of me if they knew I was reading the kind of stuff that causes fits for guys like Bill O'Reilly and Joe Scarborough.
Perhaps the most interesting part of Griffin's 26-page prelude is his discussion of the term "conspiracy theory," the generic meaning of which is, simply, a theory about an agreement among multiple players to do something bad. Everyone, Griffin writes, "holds a conspiracy theory in the generic sense about 9/11, because everyone believes that the 9/11 attacks resulted from a secret agreement to perform illegal, treacherous, and evil acts. People differ only about the identity of the conspirators." True, the idea that the Bush administration ordered the destruction of the World Trade Center is out there. But, Griffin asks, isn't it equally crazy to believe that 19 dudes with box cutters "defeated the most sophisticated defense system in history"? Why is one conspiracy theory considered irrational and not the other?
Many levelheaded thinkers believe that if 9/11 were an inside job, so many people would have to have been in on it that someone would blow the whistle, and that's the critique Griffin has the most trouble explaining away.
It was when Griffin noted one of the reasons liberals like me dismiss the movement���that it's a distraction from what we perceive to be more immediate concerns about the present administration���that I was prompted to admit to myself that one of the obstacles keeping me from diving into this particular rabbit hole is that I want to maintain at least a shred of credibility among more moderate readers. The introduction to the 9/11 Truth movement might be as far as I'm willing to go. I don't know���we'll see.
Write to [address removed]
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY
", your message will be sent to everyone
on this mailing list ([address removed]
This message was sent by Abby Martin ([address removed]
) from The San Diego 9/11 Questions Meetup Group.
To learn more about Abby Martin, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here
Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA