addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwchatcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgoogleimageimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinmagnifying-glassmailminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1outlookpersonplusprice-ribbonImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruseryahoo

Re: [alternativeenergy-224] Back to theFuture

From: Mitchell
Sent on: Friday, June 22, 2012 2:56 PM
This is a good thing.  I remember some engineers discussing this 20 or
30 years ago.  Do you know if any commercial voyages are occurring

I would imagine that steamship lines would be switching over to nat
gas fuel; it's much cheaper than diesel oil.  That will further delay
the adoption of wind power.


On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Rohn Brown <[address removed]> wrote:
> Some people are moving forward (less carbon) to the past:
> http://www.gizmag...­
> --
> Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on
> this mailing list ([address removed])
> This message was sent by Rohn Brown ([address removed]) from The Solar
> Society.
> To learn more about Rohn Brown, visit his/her member profile
> Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email |
> Don't send me mailing list messages
> Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] |
> [address removed]

Check out my blog at http://earthchurc...­ !

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy