Re: [The-9-12-Project-in-Mentor-OH] Fwd: Chair of the judiciary committee and chair of the oversight committee subpoenaed to appear in court

From: ILONA T.
Sent on: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 8:01 AM
We all know what needs to be done....the question is: who will lay out the PLAN that can be followed by all so we actually get there? Don't need bits and pieces of ideas...but an actual plan!



-----Original Message-----
From: David Black <[address removed]>
To: the-9-12-project-in-mentor-oh-list <[address removed]>
Sent: Wed, Apr 3,[masked]:52 am
Subject: [The-9-12-Project-in-Mentor-OH] Fwd: Chair of the judiciary committee and chair of the oversight committee subpoenaed to appear in court

Orly Taitz refuses to quit. She may be extreme, but at least she understands the 
danger this country faces. If her allegations are true, we must all step up our 
efforts to restore constitutional government.


--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this 
mailing list ([address removed])
http://www.meetup.com/The-9-12-Project-in-Mentor-OH/
This message was sent by David Black ([address removed]) from The 9-12 Project 
in Mentor, OH.
To learn more about David Black, visit his/her member profile: 
http://www.meetup.com/The-9-12-Project-in-Mentor-OH/members/15905501/
Set my mailing list to email me

As they are sent
http://www.meetup.com/The-9-12-Project-in-Mentor-OH/list_prefs/?pref=1

In one daily email
http://www.meetup.com/The-9-12-Project-in-Mentor-OH/list_prefs/?pref=2

Don't send me mailing list messages
http://www.meetup.com/The-9-12-Project-in-Mentor-OH/list_prefs/?pref=0
Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | [address removed]
Attached Message
From: Orly Taitz <[address removed]>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Bcc: [address removed]
Subject: Chair of the judiciary committee and chair of the oversight committeesubpoenaed to appear in court
Date: Wed, 3 Apr[masked]:35:33 -0100
  • Home


  • …Breaking news! Defendant Barack Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al. Notice of Default filed
  • …Grinols Subpoenas
  • ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
  • .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
  • 1. Judd v Obama
  • 2. Farrar v Obama
  • 3. Taitz v Sebelius
  • 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
  • 5. Taitz v Astrue
  • 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
  • 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
  • Videos
  • Video: Orly before NH Election Committee
  • Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

    Defend Our Freedoms Foundation – 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100, Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688 – Copyright 2010



    World's Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site

    If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
    Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

    Mail donations to: Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
    29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
    Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
    Contact Dr. Taitz at [address removed] or [address removed].
    In case of emergency, call[masked]-5411.

    "It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." -- Theodore Roosevelt, April 23, 1910

    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
    When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

    -- Thomas Jefferson

    During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
    becomes a revolutionary act.
    -- George Orwell

    First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you,
    then you win.
    -- Mahatma Gandhi

    The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers, do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq.
    Dr. Taitz, Esq. has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.

    Judge England is wrong is every way and if you read his decision involving service, Judge England really provides nothing that justify his decision.

    Posted on | April 2, 2013 | No Comments
    avatar
    johnApril 2, 2013 at 10:00 am john(Quote)#
    Under Federal Law 4e Orly Taitz has PROPERLY served Obama:
    (b) leaving a copy of each at the individual’s dwelling or usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there;
    Orly had process servers go to Obama’s usual place of abode with is the White House (Remember Obama is also the President, so this is his dwelling place.) and serve Obama.
    There are 3 problems however:
    1. The Secret Service, who would be considered of suitable age and who do recide at the White House REFUSED to accept Service. Orly can’t FORCE the service upon these individuals.
    2. The Secret Service demanded Obama be served through the US Attorny’s office which was done.
    3. The Carter Case makes precident that Obama can be served through the US Attorney’s office.
    Judge England is wrong is every way and if you read his decision involving service, Judge Englan really provides nothing that justify his decision.
    Share

    Congressman Bob Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee, was subpoenaed to appear at April 18,2013 hearing before Judge Morrison England and testify, whether he knew that he was represented by the US Attorney’s office in this case, whether the U.S. attorney Ed Olsen forwarded to him pleadings and exhibits in this case prior to filing an opposition to stay certification of Obama’s electoral votes and prior to filing the motion to dismiss and whether he agreed to do so in spite of evidence of Barack Obama using forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number

    Posted on | April 2, 2013 | 21 Comments
    Press release
    Law offices of Orly Taitz
    Congressman Bob Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee, was subpoenaed to appear at April 18,2013 hearing before Judge Morrison England and testify, whether he knew that he was represented by the US Attorney’s office in this case, whether the U.S. attorney Ed Olsen forwarded to him pleadings and exhibits in this case prior to filing an opposition to stay certification of Obama’s electoral votes and prior to filing the motion to dismiss and whether he agreed to do so in spite of evidence of Barack Obama using forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number
    More information on this case is at orlytaitzesq.com
    Notices
    2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
    CIVIL,APPEAL
    U.S. District Court
    Eastern District of California – Live System
    Notice of Electronic Filing
    The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 4/2/2013 at 11:32 AM PDT and filed on 4/2/2013
    Case Name:Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
    Case Number:2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
    Filer:James Grinols

    Keith Judd

    Thomas Gregory MacLeran

    Edward Noonan

    Robert Odden
    Document Number:106


    Docket Text: NOTICE of subpoena for Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the House Judiciary Committee to appear at 04/18/2013 hearing and testify whether the U.S. Attorneys office forward to him the pleadings and exhibits in this case and whether he knew that the U.S. Attorneys office opposed the injunction and filed for dismissal of the case in spite of evidence of Barack Obama using forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number by James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan, Robert Odden re [84] Minute Order,,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing,,. (Taitz, Orly)
    2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
    Edward A Olsen , GOVT [address removed], [address removed], [address removed], [address removed]
    George Michael Waters [address removed], [address removed]
    Orly Taitz [address removed]
    2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to:
    The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
    Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=[masked] [Date=4/2/2013] [FileNumber=6068039-0] [[masked]c4f860810f4df1ee384ee359b1de801be9095d4625b8360f8bb50f7d5ede 9ebee36ee467bad864fd3cdab13a4c085d8fad2846361c6a886d222baeac]]
    Share

    I have a serious concern, what do you think?

    Posted on | April 2, 2013 | 43 Comments
    There is one issue that really concerns me: why in light of evidence of forgery would plaintiffs seek a certified copy of Obama’s birth certificate and not examination of the original?
    Originally there were 45 attorneys and hundreds of pro se plaintiffs, who filed election challenges and legal challenges. At the end, people got frustrated, overwhelmed and aside from me only one other attorney has a case, and he recently filed an appellant’s brief in AL. The brief is seeking an appeal of the denial of the Petition of writ of mandamus, an order for the Secretary of State to seek a certified copy of Obama’s birth certificate.
    Probably there is no person in the country who wants this case to be heard on the merits and succeed more than I do, I hope this case is heard on the merits, however I am concerned about a couple of problems. One, of course, is the notion by the Secretary of State that she has no duty to seek the certified copy and that it is moot. Let’s say 2 out of 3 judges on the panel rule for the plaintiffs (there are 7 judges in this court and we do not know if Roy Moore will be on the panel of 3 who actually hear this case), let’s say the court grants requested relief, which of course is very unlikely. What happens next? I am extremely concerned that the same registrar from the state of HI, who was complicit for 4 years now will certify another copy of the same forgery and this will be used as a big victory by Obama over the birthers. Obama will claim that this is the ultimate proof. Why are attorneys in AL asking for a certified copy instead of the examination of the original?

    Rule 1003. Admissibility of Duplicates

    A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as the original unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or the circumstances make it unfair to admit the duplicate.
    This is a federal rule, which is similar to the rules of evidence in every state. Why aren;t they asking examination of the original?
    This happened twice before. Rules of civil procedure require production of the original in light of the evidence of forgery. Any attorney knows that. However, Secretary of State of KS Chris Kobach and Secretary of State of AZ, Bennett, requested certified copies, Alvin Onaka certified the same forgery and not only this did not help, it actually hurt the case, as all the media trumpeted that Conservative Secretaries of state Kobach and Bennett announced that they are satisfied with the certified copies. This caused Obama media machine to attack me 10 times more, calling me names, saying: how come Attorney Orly Taitz is continuing the fight, she must be a racist. I am afraid that the same can happen in AL and it will only hurt us. Moreover, I am concerned about the fact that in their case they only provided one affidavit from Arpaio and no other affidavits. In my cases I have 150 pages of affidavits from law enforcement and experts. The court might state that if Arpaio were to believe that a crime was committed in his state of AZ, he had a duty to file a criminal complaint with his District Attorney. If he did not do this, it indicates to the court that he is not sure that the crime was committed. I do not know, why didn’t they include other evidence. The complaint talks only about Arpaio, who never filed a criminal complaint, which a sheriff would normally do if a crime is committed, and they are talking about Corsi, who is just a journalist. I do not know, why the complaint does not include, for example, a sworn affidavit of Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, who is a retired Chief Investigator of the special investigations unit of the U.S. coast guard. Coffman sent to Arpaio the results of his findings regarding Obama’s forged Selective Service certificate. Arpaio only confirmed those findings, just as he confirmed other findings. If one does not have a valid Selective Service certificate he cannot work in the executive branch, meaning he cannot work as a U.S. President.
    I do not know if any changes can be made in AL cases in this late stage, after the Appellant’s brief was already filed, but I am concerned that it might backfire. What do you think?
    Share

    Today I travelled to the Social security office in Stamford, CT where the SSN fraudulently used by Obama, was issued. I recorded all the information received from them and they forwarded to Washington DC all the evidence of fraud provided by me

    Posted on | March 26, 2013 | 72 Comments
    Press release
    Attorney Taitz traveled today to Stamford, CT, to the regional Social Security administration office, where the CT Social Security number[masked], fraudulently used by Obama, was issued
    Taitz met with Representative Madeline Mercado, Assistant Manager Mrs. Sheridan (she refused to give her first name) and General Manager Mrs. Booker (she refused to give her first name).
    Taitz provided them with a printout of the 2009 tax returns of Obama which he originally posted without flattening the PDF file and with a full unredacted Social Security number, as well as a printout of of the E-Verify and SSNVS reports, showing that the number used by Obama was never assigned to him. She also advised them that according to multiple databases this number was issued in their office in and around March[masked] to Harry J. Bounel born in 1890. Taitz demanded criminal investigation and a ruling showing Bounel to be deceased and the number inactive and therefore the application available for release to the public. While Taitz waited, Ms. Booker and Ms. Sheridan contacted Washington DC.
    Ms. Sheridan advised Taitz that she will be contacted by an employee in Washington DC, who will be handling this.
    Taitz will provide more details at a later time. She is currently in the airport and cannot provide more details.
    More info on orlytaitzESQ.com
    Donations to cover travel expenses are greatly appreciated
    Share

    New Line of attack: start recall of officials who refuse to take action and are complicit in the cover up of Obama’s forged IDs and a stolen SSN

    Posted on | March 30, 2013 | 27 Comments
    A number of years ago we had a successful recall of the Democratic Party Governor Grey Davis and his replacement with a Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
    The left was successful in a recall of a state senator in AZ. The left came very close to recalling the governor of WI. Citizens of New Jersey came close to recalling a U.S. Senator in New Jersey.
    Recalls work and recalls send a message to officials. We have to send a message: we will not tolerate treason, we will not tolerate corrupt officials being complicit in the cover up of the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a citizen of Indonesia, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen SSN . We have to start a recall drive of an official in a conservative state for his complicity to cover up Obama’s forged IDs. For example, we can recall corrupt state judges, who dismissed eligibility cases with bogus excuses and particularly ones, who attacked pro se plaintiffs and attorneys. I remember a judge in Alabama, who attacked Mr. Sorenson and did not grant him a right to have a pro hac vice attorney in order to quickly cover up the issue of Obama’s forged IDs. We can recall any state official, who is complicit: District Attorney, Secretary of State, Attorney General and so on. It might be easier to start with a low ranking official, where we need less signatures for recall. Succeeding in one state with a low ranking official will give strength and confidence to go after other treasonous officials.
    I am asking my supporters to check the state statutes in his own state and let me know how many signatures we need to recall a corrupt judge, corrupt AG, corrupt DA, corrupt Sheriff, corrupt congressman, corrupt senator, corrupt Secretary of State and a corrupt Attorney General of a state.
    We were able to get nearly 50,000 e-mails and letters sent through petitions to Congress. We can raise large numbers. The problem with Congress, is that they are not required to do anything even when the numbers are large. However, in states elections we can place a recall of a corrupt judge or a corrupt District Attorney or sheriff on the ballot, if we are able to get a speciffic number of signatures. I will check, how many signatures are needed to recall Judge Charles Marginis in the Superior Court of California, Orange county division, who had in front of him all the evidence of Obama’s use of all forged and stolen IDs, and he improperly dismissed the case, refused to grant a motion to compel Obama’s registration from the Occidental college and rewarded Occidental college with $4,000 in attorneys’ fees for their complicity in the cover up. I wonder, how many signatures do I need to recall this judge. Please, e-mail me at [address removed] and copy on this blog the information and specific statutes. Do not send me a lot of material: just small excerpts showing the needed numbers for a recall of corrupt officials.
    Share

    Unredacted TYT interview. Please, forward the information. We need one Sheriff or AG or Congressmen with integrity to move with it

    Posted on | March 31, 2013 | 24 Comments
    Share

    April 1, 2013: Great news, we finally found an honest judge, honest congressmen, bureaucrats and sheriffs. Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo finally switched from idle talk and fundraising to filing a criminal complaint against Obama with the District Atorney and Attorney General. Great!

    Posted on | April 1, 2013 | 48 Comments
    Share

    As expected more and more countries drop the US dollar as a reserve currency, turning the real dollar value equal to the value of the toilet paper, while our ruling elite is either asleep, brain dead or complicit. What’s your pick?

    Posted on | April 1, 2013 | 15 Comments
    Share

    Posted on | April 1, 2013 | 9 Comments
    FreemanPaul 22 approved
    It’s a good April Fools trick, Orly, but the sad part is that some people are so gullible here that they fell for it.
    We need strong thinkers, not gullible ones.
    We can not allow ourselves to be so foolish as to believe that Arpaio and Zullo will EVER file a criminal complaint. They have had over a year and one Presidential election to do it. Won’t happen. They have no courage.
    It’s been TWO YEARS since Trump promised he was going to release the “explosive findings” his so-called investigators dug up in Hawaii. TWO YEARS LATER Trump is still blabbing, but has never released a single fact that he didn’t steal from you first. He is hoping we have forgotten about his ‘investigators’.
    We all know where Berg, Liberi, Kreep, Farah, Corsi, WND are coming from, and going to. Nowhere.
    We don;t need any more gullible people believing nonsense. We need strong clear thinkers moving from fact to fact, and not wasting time on poseurs like Arpaio, Trump, Zullo and the non-existent non-corrupt Judge.
    Good April Fools joke, Orly. It has taught us a lot.
    Share

    National call to action from General Vallely

    Posted on | April 1, 2013 | 14 Comments
    Subject:National Call to action
    Release Date: April 1, 2013
    Limited Distribution: By Stand Up America
    Contact: [address removed]
    2013
    National Call to Action
    By Paul E. Vallely
    Our Federal Government continues down the path of destroying America. American Patriots must now Stand UP and put America back on the track. The Federal Government has not subsided in “sucking the oxygen” out of America and its people with legislation and without required action to solve our problems
    The National Call to Action of the people begins now! And we call to action all branches of government to do your constitutional duties and not be led astray in the cultural and moral decay of America. We have witnessed far too many lies, deception and corruption in the Republic.
    Start immediately to cut the government bureaucracy and structure by 25%… Eliminate all unnecessary departments of Energy, Homeland Security, Education, the Federal Reserve and EPA and return the functions to the private sector and the states. Eliminate the IRS and institute a “fair or flat tax”. Initiate the relocation of the United Nations to Athens Greece or a third world country and cut back the funding of this corrupt and ineffective institution. Implement an effective national security policy and “forward strategy to defend America’s interests against the threat of Shariah (Islamic law), a nuclear Iran and North Korea, and Islamic terror. Defend our borders and take on the onslaught of the drug cartels, illegal immigrants, and terrorists now pouring into our country. Finally, pass term limits for Congress, Eliminate all earmarks and pass state assistance programs in one piece of legislation yearly. Balance the budget and move to a more effective Federal Reserve System or eliminate it all together. Slice deeply all foreign aid programs to countries not deserving of our good will. All countries must earn our aid so they will start off with a zero balance each year. Stop the military out of ‘Nation Building’ but ensure we fight to win the battles we must. I could go on with many other recommendations to get our country back on track. The above is just a taste of what can be done! Disallow all lobbyists and special interests groups. You politicians, the President and all the Federal and State Bureaucracies work only for the People, no one else!
    You see, we do not need you other than to represent us, the People, and abide by and protect the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Declaration of Independence states: “To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.
    “I am the master of my fate; I am the captain of my soul.” From the Poem Invictus by English poet William Ernest Henley (1849–1903) that was penned in 1875. Yes, America, WE are the Masters of our Fate and the Captains of our Soul.” on burns and self-destructs before our very eyes but now you are starting to awaken. The majority of the country and its citizens have experienced and seen our inept and incompetent leadership In Washington! The battle is on and we shall not retreat.
    We will not permit the leaders in the White House and Halls of Congress to lead us down a road of Progressive Socialism and destruction of the Republic. The Patriotic Revolution that I forecasted well over a year ago is happening now. We Constitutionalists face a battle that is unknown to our generations so we must be aggressive in our collective efforts to continue to turn back the tide. The Fate of the country is now in our hands and the plea from the majority of our citizens is to enforce the Constitution, severely limit the Federal Government and it’s out of control spending. There is a growing list of documented violations of the Constitution and their Oath of Office by current elected and appointed government officials
    Lincoln issued this warning in his inaugural address, “Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one. This is a most valuable and sacred right – a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.” Being a representative republic, not a democracy, and “rising up” means other than revolution by use of arms. The people must “rise up” (Stand Up) from the grass roots across this great country as we think of the greater good of this and future generations. We are limited in the peaceful transfer of power…resignation, elections, and impeachment. That is why the Patriotic Revolution and Patriotic Union must take place to ensure survival of the Union.
    The oath is simple and reads: “I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.” Sadly, we have seen them violate their oath. Fraud, lying, and corruption are rampant and some have engaged in treasonous activities, and they effectively thumb their noses at us and have sold you to the highest bidder.
    The Articles of Confederation were replaced with the Constitution, which granted the federal government enough authority to cultivate, promote and secure the Blessings of Liberty. The balance of authority and individual liberty was understood. Power was confined to that which was enumerated in the Constitution with a certain and meaningful intent for check and balances. We must make it a local imperative and movement….of the People…by the People… and For the People.
    “We, the People” have had enough. Enough is Enough. The Obama White House and identifiable Members of Congress must now depart from a progressive socialist and treasonous death march and bankrupting the country beyond expectations. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office. “We, the People” cannot solely depend on the results of the elections. It is now that many of these public servants (and you know who they are) must put the people and country interests above self-interest by resigning and stepping down immediately. A civil uprising is still not out of the question as “pain” grips the country more each day. Hopefully, our future will reflect the citizens changed the tide in a peaceful way. This means raising your voice now to your neighbors, family, co-workers, and friends. Be the Captains of your Souls. I pray for another George Washington to appear within the year and lead us. This is a National Call to Action.
    Paul Vallely is Chairman of Stand Up America.
    Paul E. Vallely MG, US Army (ret)
    Chairman – Stand Up America
    [address removed]
    Share

    Sadly a notion of an honest judge, congressman or bureaucrat reviewing ObamaForgerygate on the merits, as well as Sheriff Arpaio and Zullo filing an actual criminal complaint with the District Attorney instead of idle talking and fundraising is just an April 1 joke. Contact them and demand that they do their job and not turn this great nation into a one big joke!

    Posted on | April 1, 2013 | 4 Comments
    Share

    What’s your pick: is it criminally complicit, brain dead, asleep or all of the above???

    Posted on | April 1, 2013 | 19 Comments
    Bob69 68 approved
    With Congress I’d say it’s 100% complicit, and many of the complicit are also asleep and brain dead. All of the above would be the correct answer.
    Share

    Press release: A notice of appeal of the denial of the Default Judgment against Defendant Obama is filed. An Appellant’s brief will be filed at a later date upon an order by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

    Posted on | April 1, 2013 | 34 Comments

    Activity in Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al Notice of Appeal

    [address removed]
    10:03 PM (4 hours ago)

    to CourtMail
    This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
    U.S. District Court
    Eastern District of California – Live System
    Notice of Electronic Filing
    The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 4/1/2013 at 4:03 PM PDT and filed on 4/1/2013
    Case Name:Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
    Case Number:2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
    Filer:James Grinols

    Keith Judd

    Thomas Gregory MacLeran

    Edward Noonan

    Robert Odden
    Document Number: 104


    Docket Text: NOTICE of APPEAL by James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan, Robert Odden. (Taitz, Orly)
    2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
    Edward A Olsen , GOVT &nbsp &nbsp [address removed], [address removed], [address removed], [address removed]
    George Michael Waters &nbsp &nbsp [address removed], [address removed]
    Orly Taitz &nbsp & nbsp [address removed]
    2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to:
    The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
    Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=[masked] [Date=4/1/2013] [FileNumber=6066519-0] [557fd4251fb7a2247d2f3b189dc3141cb76066da6b34e5d5677ecce74137dc27fed7 fcf33096d9df34ea7431d90e9a47eec0e65f04e15fc1562569240c8429fa]]
    Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
    29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
    Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
    Counsel for Plaintiffs
    IN THE US DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    Grinols et. al., )
    Plaintiffs ) Case #[masked]
    V ) Hon Morrison C. England Presiding
    Electoral College et. al., )
    Defendants )
    NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT BARRY SOETORO, AKA BARACK HUSSEIN SOEBARKAH, AKA HARRISON J. BOUNEL, AKA BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND AN EXPARTE REQUEST TO STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE IN RELATION TO ALL PARTIES PENDING ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL WITH THE 9TH CIRCUIT
    This court is hereby notified that plaintiffs filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of an order by this court to deny the motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack Obama Soebarkah, aka Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel, aka Barack Hussein Obama (Hereinafter Obama) as well as a Motion for Reconsideration of the Denial of the Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Obama. The District Court denied the Motion for the Default Judgment, claiming that Defendant Obama had to be served at his residence and not through the U.S. Attorneys’ office. In the Motion for Reconsideration Plaintiffs provided new evidence: two sworn affidavits of process servers, attesting to the fact that Obama refuses to be served at his residence and demands to be served through the U.S. Attorneys’ office, as well a ruling from a previous related case, where U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter demanded Obama to be served through the U.S. Attorneys’ office and refused to grant a default judgment due to the fact that Obama was not served through the U.S. Attorneys’ office. As such, two U.S. District Judges denied a default judgment against Obama for diametrically opposite reasons: one judge DEMANDED that Plaintiffs serve Obama through the U.S. Attorneys’ office, while another judge refused to grant the same default judgment, stating that Obama CANNOT BE SERVED THROUGH THE U.S. ATTORNEYS’ OFFICE. As such adjudication by the 9th Circuit is essential to resolve diametrically opposite rulings by two District Courts within the same circuit. This is particularly important, as currently such dismissals of cases against Obama with diametrically opposite rulings placed Obama above the law and outside the law, whereby he simply ignores any courts, shows contempt towards the whole nation and continues occupying the position of the President and Commander in Chief while using a stolen Social Secuity number, forged Selective service Certificate, forged Birth Certificate, last name not legally his and a foreign citizenship. Plaintiffs state that the District Court in the case at hand erred and abused its’ judicial discretion by refusing to consider the fact that service of process at Obama’s residence was impossible, that Obama consented to be served through the U.S. Attorneys’ office and the precedent from the U.S. District Court in Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama et al. 09-cv-082. Plaintiffs assert that refusal to grant the Default Judgment and take into consideration paramount public interest and the interest of national security in relation to provided evidence of Obama using a stolen Social Security number, forged IDs, a name not legally his and a foreign citizenship, makes the Federal Court complicit in the cover up of the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by an individual using forged and fraudulently obtained IDs. This possibly makes Federal court complicit in treason against the United States of America by allowing the usurpation of the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief.
    Additionally Plaintiffs seek a stay of all further proceedings in this case pending adjudication of the appeal at hand by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
    EX-PARTE MOTION TO STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE PENDING A RULING ON THE APPEAL OF THE DENIAL OF THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
    Under local rule 144 and FRCP 6 Plaintiffs are bringing this ex parte expedited motion seeking a stay of all further proceedings in this case pending adjudication of the appeal.
    Ex Parte motion and expedited ruling is warranted for a number of reasons:
    1. An oral argument on defendants’ motion to dismiss is scheduled for April 18th, only two weeks from now. There is a danger of conflicting rulings by this court and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. A regular noticed motion for STAY on a regular 28 day schedule will end up being heard after the Defense motion to dismiss and will end up creating conflicting rulings. As such a motion to STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS should be reviewed by this court on an expedited ex-parte basis PRIOR TO FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
    2. Defendant Obama is the main defendant in this case. Decision by the 9th Circuit on the appeal regarding Defendant Obama will affect the decisions in regards to other defendants. If argundo this court rules in favor of the defendants, but the 9th Circuit rules that this court erred in not taking into consideration the sworn affidavits of two process servers and not taking into consideration the impossibility of serving Obama at his residence, as well as Obama’s consent to be served through the U.S. attorney’ office, and reverses the ruling in regards to the motion for Default Judgment, then the decision by this court in regards to other Defendants will end up being reversed as well.
    3. Ex-Parte expedited ruling is warranted due to the enormity of Public interest in stopping the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a foreign citizen using a stolen Social Security number, forged Selective Service certificate and a forged birth certificate. There is an enormous public interest in declaratory relief on the matter, adjudication of the matter and criminal prosecution of all high ranking federal and state officials, who are complicit in forgery, election fraud, Social Security fraud, usurpation of the U.S. Presidency and usurpation of the position of the Commander in Chief and possibly treason. This makes the case at hand akin to U.S. v Nixon 418 U.S. 683 (1974).
    CONCLUSION
    Based on all of the above Ex parte expedited motion to STAY all further proceedings pending a ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of the Appeal at hand is warranted and should be granted.
    /s/ Orly Taitz
    Counsel for Plaintiffs
    [masked]
    Cc Congressman John Goodlatte-
    Chair of the Committee on the Judiciary U.S. House of Representatives
    2309 Rayburn HOB
    Washington, D.C. 20515
    Phone: (202)[masked]
    Fax: (202)[masked]
    CC Congressman Darrel Issa-
    Chair House Oversight Committee
    2347 Rayburn House Office Building
    Washington, DC 20515e Buo2347 Rayburn House Office Building
    • Washington, DC 20515
    • Phone:[masked]
    • 2347 Rayburn House Office Building
    • Washington, DC 20515
    • Phone:[masked]
    • Fax:[masked]
    • Fax:[masked]
    Proposed order
    IN THE US DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    Grinols et al ) Case # 12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
    V ) ORDER
    Electoral College et al )
    Plaintiffs filed an appeal of the order by this court to deny the Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack Obama Soebarkah, aka Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel, aka Barack Hussein Obama (Hereinafter Obama) as well as a Motion for Reconsideration of the Denial of the Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Obama.
    Plaintiffs are seeking a stay of all further proceedings in this case against all defendants pending adjudication of the appeal. Plaintiffs argue that the defendant Obama is the main defendant in this case and the ruling by the 9th Circuit in relation to Obama will affect all other defendants and there is a possibility of conflicting rulings if the stay is not granted. This court agrees. Motion to STAY all further proceedings is GRANTED. This court orders all further proceedings in this case STAYED pending adjudication of the Appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
    MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR, CHIEF JUDGE
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
    Share

    Trump temporarily withdrew his law suit against Bill Maher in order to amend it and refile it later. Please, ontract Trump, ask him to speak up on Obama’s bogus SSN and forged IDs instead of wasting time on a dumb joke by a comedian

    Posted on | April 2, 2013 | No Comments

    Donald Trump WITHDRAWS 5 million-dollar ‘birther’ lawsuit against

    www.dailymail.co.uk/…/Donald-Trump-WITHDRAWS-5-mill…Share
    Shared on Google+. View the post.
    You +1′d this publicly. Undo
    10 hours ago – The real estate mogul had earned a reputation as a ‘birther’ in the mold of lawyer Orly Taitz (R) after he pressured the White House to release a copy of Obama’s
    Share

    I do not have any contact with the author of this article. Can someone reach her and ask if she will provide a sworn affidavit for me?

    Posted on | April 2, 2013 | No Comments

    Evidence Drop – Hawaii DOH apparently …….

    Maria
    5:04 AM (5 hours ago)

    to me
    Tuesday, April 2, 2013

    Evidence Drop: Hawaii DOH Apparently Gave Obama Stig Waidelich’s Birth Certificate Number

    Obama Release Your Records on2:32 PM |[][]
    []
    Evidence Drop: Hawaii Department Of Health Apparently Gave Obama Stig Waidelich’s Birth Certificate Number – Excerpts Via Butterdezillion’s Three-Part Report -
    Continue here…..
    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/04/hdoh-gave-obama-stigs-birth-certificate-number.html
    Share

    response by Congressman Spencer Bachus (R-AL). He sounds completely out of it or he pretends to be out of it. Please, organize a group of patriots with large signs “Spencer Bachus, stop committing treason, stop covering up Obama’s forged and stolen IDs and visit his home office with signs. Please, send me the pictures and video of your visit, I will make it go viral

    Posted on | April 2, 2013 | 1 Comment
    Dr. Taitz,
    I have attached a letter from the Honorable Spencer Bachus (Rep AL) which was a response to an email I sent via his web site. In the email I referenced the subpoenas , the information requested thereby, and the information and affidavits supplied and the fraud being committed.
    The letter I received in return is disappointing in many respects but particularly in that there was not even the courteous reference to any specifics I offered. Only generics in regard to presidential qualifications and a ” should any legislation…. ” reference. I’m sure it was a form letter.
    I called and indicated my displeasure. I did ask that Representative Bachus be asked specifically if he would be willing to meet with you and look at the evidence. They have my number ….
    Michael
    Share

    ‘Who (or what) has the power to make the issue of Obama’s INELIGIBILITY and acts of TREASON not fit for discussion, only derision …

    Posted on | April 2, 2013 | 2 Comments
    Neil Turner 11 approved
    Attorneys in AL asking for a ‘Certified Copy’ of Obama’s fictitious HI ‘Certificate of Birth’ is like Arpaio saying “we’re not accusing Obama of anything, we’re looking for the ‘printing press operator’ who gave him the ‘bad checks’ that Obama has been passing all over the country (and the world).”
    Sheeeesh! How dumb is that. Imagine the shame they must feel as they look themselves in the mirror each day wondering:
    ‘Who (or what) has the power to make the issue of Obama’s INELIGIBILITY and acts of TREASON not fit for discussion, only derision … and to turn otherwise intelligent people into blithering idiots?’
    Share

    Press release: subpoena was issued for Darryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee, to appear and testify whether he knew that he is being represented by the U.S. Attorney in this case and whether he received pleadings and exhibits prior to filing of opposition to injunction and a motion to dismiss by the U.S. Attorney

    Posted on | April 2, 2013 | No Comments
    Press release
    Law Offices of Orly taitz
    Subpoena issued for Darryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight committee, to appear and testify at April 18, 2013 hearing whether he knew that he is being represented by the U.S. Attorney in this case and whether he received pleadings and exhibits prior to filing of opposition to injunction and a motion to dismiss by the U.S. Attorneys’ office
    more information on this case at OrlyTaitzesq.com
    Attorney Taitz is representing plaintiffs in this case pro bono. The plaintiffs were not charged any court fees. Donations to cover fees and expenses are appreciated.
    Notices
    2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
    CIVIL,APPEAL,CREDIT_CARD
    U.S. District Court
    Eastern District of California – Live System
    Notice of Electronic Filing
    The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 4/2/2013 at 12:45 PM PDT and filed on 4/2/2013
    Case Name:Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
    Case Number:2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
    Filer:James Grinols

    Keith Judd

    Thomas Gregory MacLeran

    Edward Noonan

    Robert Odden
    Document Number:108


    Docket Text: NOTICE of subpoena for Congressman Darryl Issa to appear at 04/18/2013 hearing and testify whether he knew that he is represented by the U.S. Attorneys in this case and whether he received pleadings and exhibits from the U.S. Attorney prior to the filing by the U.S. Attorney of the opposition to injunction and motion to dismiss by James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan, Robert Odden re [84] Minute Order,,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing,,. (Taitz, Orly)
    2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
    Edward A Olsen , GOVT [address removed], [address removed], [address removed], [address removed]
    George Michael Waters [address removed], [address removed]
    Orly Taitz [address removed]
    2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to:
    The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
    Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=[masked] [Date=4/2/2013] [FileNumber=6068398-0] [[masked]d68f27cf877c2249c2b339a8e63d190bbbbab2da667fffca1ffe9e9351 3f8b1f38aeb44934d4220757c3c98e6e7d059916a77b147caf0471503f3d]]
    Credit Card Payments
    2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
    CIVIL,APPEAL
    PLEASE NOTE: IN ORDER TO SECURE YOUR CREDIT CARD INFORMATION, YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE AN E-MAIL CONFIRMATION OF THIS TRANSACTION AT THIS TIME. UPON AUTHORIZATION OF YOUR CREDIT CARD PAYMENT, THE CLERK’S OFFICE WILL ISSUE A RECEIPT AND YOU WILL RECEIVE NOTICE ELECTRONICALLY.

    Activity in Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al


    6:15 PM (4 hours ago)

    to CourtMail
    This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
    U.S. District Court
    Eastern District of California – Live System
    Notice of Electronic Filing
    The following transaction was entered on 4/2/2013 at 12:14 PM PDT and filed on 4/2/2013
    Case Name:Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
    Case Number:2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
    Filer:
    Document Number:107


    Docket Text: APPEAL PROCESSED to Ninth Circuit re [104] Notice of Appeal filed by Keith Judd, Robert Odden, James Grinols, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan. Filed dates for Notice of Appeal *4/1/2013*, Complaint *12/13/2013* and Appealed Order / Judgment *3/11/2013*. Court Reporter: *n/a*. *Fee Status: Not Paid – Billed* *James Grinols, Robert Odden, Edward Noonan, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran* (Donati, J)
    Share

    Check, how many signatures do we need and how fast to recall this gang of 8 senators robbing Americans of their jobs and benefits

    Posted on | April 2, 2013 | No Comments


    ‘Do the American people really want more immigrants?’
    Welcome to The Michael Savage Newsletter, your daily insider report on all things “Savage.”
    In today’s issue: Dr. Savage blasted the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” senators who are pushing for “immigration reform,” which is simply a code word for “amnesty.”
    He contrasted the American situation with Britain’s, where a new populist anti-immigration party called UKIP is gaining popularity.

    “In England, as liberal as it is, there is a growing anti-immigrant party called the United Kingdom Independent Party,” Michael Savage told his audience, explaining:They’re on the rise because they’re part of a wave of anti-immigrant populism that wants an end to England’s open-door policy.
    The English are no longer welcome in their own country.
    Freeloaders come in and literally take over.
    Meanwhile, in America there doesn’t seem to be any party that represents the people.
    Instead we have two gangs called Republicans and Democrats.
    Then to make matters worse, the moochers in both parties put together a gang that’s no different than the Crips and the Bloods, called the Gang of Eight.
    Think about the irony of a group of U.S. senators referring to themselves as the Gang of Eight, saying, “We’re very close to an immigration deal.”
    Is everything a deal to these gangsters?
    Where is support for immigration reform?
    If you were to ask the American people, would they say they want more immigrants?
    Would they say, “We want further weakening of our borders, our language and our culture”?
    Are you crazy?
    Share

    Posted on | April 2, 2013 | No Comments

    Look who’s running the White House show!!!


    4:32 PM (4 hours ago)

    to undisclosed recipients
    This is Very, Very Serious!!!
    Look who’s running the White House show: To All, Sometimes I feel like I am beating a dead horse, but this is very serious, and if we do not start making noise, we are all going to be very surprised, sooner than you think. Why couldn’t we find qualified men who were ‘born in America’ to help make decisions for our country. Arif


    --
    Dr Orly TaitzESQ
    29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
    Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
    ph[masked]  fax[masked] 

    People in this
    Meetup are also in:

    Sign up

    Meetup members, Log in

    By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy