Hey all,
Sorry for the confusion - I went back through and checked for unassigned jugglers and saw that there are indeed 192 of them who don't fit anywhere - don't I feel like the big ass!?
In my solution I never checked for unassigned jugglers, and with the large dataset they gave us, I just grep'd my results for the "C1970" result row and seeing that there were 6 jugglers in there assumed everything else checked out properly.?
Good job to everyone else who was more thorough than I, and once again I apologize for misleading anyone with my erroneous results.
Dunce cap'd,
-Sam
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 8:53 PM, J Shraibman
<meetup.com@jks.tupari.net> wrote:
I think at this point I've proved that there is no solution where all jugglers are assigned. ?Are you *sure* you have a solution where all jugglers are assigned? ?Did you programically check your answer?
Sam Sandberg wrote:
Your algorithm must be incorrect somehow, as there is definitely a legit
solution.
I do wish that they provided more than one giant data set and one tiny
one for testing purposes, but I guess you could write your own if you
really needed it.
-Sam
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:08 PM, J Shraibman <
meetup.com
--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]
--
Sam Sandberg
"Where is fancy bread? In the heart or in the head?"
?? -Willy Wonka