addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupsimageimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1outlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruseryahoo

The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood

This year sees the 25th anniversary of the publication of Margaret Atwood's dystopian classic, and to honour the occasion, the book has been reissued by Vintage. The Handmaid's Tale tells the story of Offred – not her real name, but the patronymic she has been given by the new regime in an oppressive parallel America of the future – and her role as a Handmaid. The Handmaids are forced to provide children by proxy for infertile women of a higher social status, the wives of Commanders. They undergo regular medical tests, and in many ways become invisible, the sum total of their biological parts.

Offred remembers her life before the inception of Gilead, when she had a husband, a daughter and a life. She had been a witness to the dissolution of the old America into the totalitarian theocracy that it now is, and she tries to reconcile the warning signs with reality: "We lived in the gaps between the stories."

Offred's tender remembrances of times past provide relief from the brutality of her new life, in which her body has become a cause of discomfort for her. Her former life is presented through glimpses of her university friends, her husband, her freedom. They are shadowy memories made all the more indistinct by Atwood's lyrical prose, in which facts appear to merge into one another, and history appears immaterial; Offred is kept alive by her inner life, and reality and history become a kind of symbiotic mirage.

Fiercely political and bleak, yet witty and wise, the novel won the inaugural Arthur C Clarke award in 1987, but Atwood has always maintained that the novel is not classifiable science fiction. Nothing practised in the Republic of Gilead is genuinely futuristic. She is right, and this novel seems ever more vital in the present day, where women in many parts of the world live similar lives, dictated by biological determinism and misogyny.


Join or login to comment.

  • Suzee

    I enjoyed all the different aspects to our discussion. Our various backgrounds and experiences makes for an interesting discussion:).

    May 31, 2013

  • Lisa

    Loved the book and the great discussion!

    May 30, 2013

  • Andrea

    I really liked it. I can see how some may have found it raised logistical questions and was hard to follow precisely, but the trust the reader had to put in Atwood to take us on this journey was well rewarded by a very intellectually stimulating and emotionally evocative read.

    May 30, 2013

  • Cathy W.

    Interesting book and lively discussion.

    May 30, 2013

  • Peter

    Great book. Great discussion!

    May 29, 2013

  • M.E.

    So busy. Didn't read the book. So sad to miss.

    May 28, 2013

  • Polly

    Bah. I have to work. See you all next month!

    May 28, 2013

  • Rayo

    Boo, this conflicts with a running class. So sorry to miss!

    May 27, 2013

  • A former member
    A former member

    Out of town :( But I will still read it!

    1 · May 16, 2013

  • Christine

    Won't be making it :(

    May 13, 2013

  • Charles H.

    Excellent writer, a book I've failed to get to for too long.

    1 · April 2, 2013

14 went

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy