|Sent on:||Friday, October 26, 2012 3:05 PM|
As I feel that I’m walking on egg shells, I won’t answer in any depth. I’ll only say that, at root, my point was that any answer that begins with ‘because I know from experience’ needs to be scrutinized. It is, after all, the agent of personal miracles.
At any rate, cheerio!!
You don't really think that such a glib simplification is what i am describing, do you? Do you really think that our senses can never be trusted? I mean, I understand when my senses could be misleading, but I think they can be trusted to indicate what i am actually experiencing.
On Oct 26, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Eric Newbury <[address removed]> wrote:
So, I’ll paraphrase again “I know you are but what am I”.
I don’t think I need to retort that beauty.
same can be said of you, or any of us whose argument against religion is that there is no sensible explanation for it, as in, evidence that appeals to our senses. Even science in fallible. That doesn't mean that every time we use our senses we're wrong.
On Oct 26, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Eric Newbury <[address removed]> wrote:
“Obviously people can be wrong, but I’m not!!!” Paraphrasing
I disagree. Obviously our senses can be tricked, but it's our use of human senses that make us atheists!
On Oct 26, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Raja <[address removed]> wrote: