Re: [humanism-174] My reply to an email my sister forwarded to me.....

From: Mark T.
Sent on: Monday, November 26, 2012 12:32 PM

No, Mark-O is not a closet fundaloon... instead he is an agnostic (at most deist) who fancies himself a caped defender of religious ideas from the atheist meanies. Whatever for, I'm not sure! The idea of God has been repackaged so many times, but no matter how it's repackaged it's still the equivalent of Santa Claus for adults.

Mark-O, if you thought it out a bit more you might be able to come up with something that would make an atheist bring his/her own atheism into question... but introducing quibbling over weenie semantics doesn't cut it! It's not going to convince anyone of anything.

On Nov 25,[masked]:13 PM, "Tim Campbell" <[address removed]> wrote:
Let me re-phrase.  I SUSPECT that Mark is a closet fundaloon.   I do not know this to be an absolute fact. I should not have stated this as such.  I am only speculating on his religiosity, but I will state that I am probably correct! lol
 
Tim Campbell
 
In a message dated 11/25/[masked]:38:14 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [address removed] writes:
Chris:  Mark is a closet fundaloon (or maybe not so closeted).  He has been arguably the longest-lived troll to have cruised this forum and has almost always resorted to dictionaryism as his way of pretending to contribute.  That he agrees with Russ's conspiracy contentions and pretentious criticisms of various members of this forum is no coincidence.  You may nod and smile; I shake my head and laugh! 
 
Tim Campbell 
 
In a message dated 11/25/[masked]:05:36 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [address removed] writes:
I didn't but at this point I'll just nod and smile. 

Chris


Sent from my ayayayphone

On Nov 25, 2012, at 10:44 AM, "Mark R. Orel" <[address removed]> wrote:

Chris:

No, I never changed context.  You are
the one who used religion in two
different contexts. 


M. Orel
P.S.

By specious, do you mean: pleasing to the
sight?  If so, thank you. 

On[masked]:46, Chris K wrote:
Mark-

Oh Mark, you're so funny. Are you being puposely specious?

You know the connotation that's being used yet choose to play semantic gymnastics.  

Chris




Sent from my ayayayphone

On Nov 25, 2012, at 2:30 AM, "Mark R. Orel" <[address removed]> wrote:

Randy: 

I fear you are showing your ignorance of the
word.  Please note the First definition. 

Dogma
1. That which is held as an established opinion;
esp., a definite and authoritative tenet, also a
code or formulation of such tenets, as by a
school of art or philosophy; as by pedagogical 
dogma
2. A doctrine or body of doctrines of theology and
and religion formally stated and authoritatively
proclaimed by a church or sect, esp., the
Roman Catholic Church. 

Pedagogic
Of or characteristic or teachers or of teaching:
also pedagogical


M. Orel



On[masked]:25, Randy Pelton wrote:
Mark,

Science has a dogma? Now you are showing real ignorance about science. Science has no dogma. There may be people who will present a scientific idea or conclusion in a dogmatic fashion. But this is not a trait of science itself. And to say otherwise is just plain bullshit. This is just more of your postmodernist nonsense leading you to make foolish statements. Science is one of the few means of acquiring knowledge that corrects its own errors. We certainly don't see that in theology.

Randy


From: Mark R. Orel <[address removed]>
To: [address removed]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [humanism-174] My reply to an email my sister forwarded to me.....

Chris:

Dogma, is a doctrine; tenet; belief. 
Ritual, a set form or system of rites,
religious or otherwise. 
Science, politics, humanism, all have
dogma and ritual, and spots even more
so. 

Religion does not require a supreme
being.  You are contradicting your own
assertion that the state can be a religion. 
"What always gets me is that people seem
to think that the Stalinist Russia and Maoist
China had no religion.  That couldn't be further
from the truth.  The state WAS the religion,
complete with unquestionable dogma, ritual,
and all the other accoutrements."



M. Orel

On[masked]:36, Chris K wrote:
Actually, no. 

There has to be dogma, a supreme being and ritual. 

Chris


Sent from my ayayayphone

On Nov 23, 2012, at 2:58 AM, "Mark R. Orel" <[address removed]> wrote:

Chris:

So you are using religion as,
any system of belief's, practices,
ethical values, etc., resembling,
suggestive of, or likened to such a
system.  In that humanism, science,
politics and anything else can be a
religion. 


M. Orel


On[masked]:52, Chris K wrote:
No, the state was the religion. 

Whatever Hitler's true beliefs were (and what do we really know of anyone's?) we can refer to a hundred instances in which he portrays himself as a Christian and none in which he portrays himself as an atheist. 

I have never said the president wasn't as religious as he makes himself out to be although many have asserted it. 

Chris






--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Mark R. Orel ([address removed]) from The Cleveland Freethinkers.
To learn more about Mark R. Orel, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Chris K ([address removed]) from The Cleveland Freethinkers.
To learn more about Chris K, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Tim Campbell ([address removed]) from The Cleveland Freethinkers.
To learn more about Tim Campbell, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Tim Campbell ([address removed]) from The Cleveland Freethinkers.
To learn more about Tim Campbell, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]

Our Sponsors

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy