addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwchatcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrosseditemptyheartfacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgoogleimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinmagnifying-glassmailminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1outlookpersonplusprice-ribbonImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruseryahoo

Re: [humanism-174] O'Reilly vs. Silverman

From: Mike
Sent on: Thursday, November 29, 2012 8:10 PM
So, let 1000 flowers bloom.  These displays do allow alternative displays.  Equal time!


On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Tim Campbell <[address removed]> wrote:
On church grounds, no. On private property, no.  On government property--a space paid for and supported by ALL taxpayers: Buddhists, atheists, Jews, Hindus, etc, yes, that would be "establishment".  Unless equal time and space is then provided to those of non-Christian beliefs!
Tim Campbell
In a message dated 11/29/2012 6:38:20 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [address removed] writes:
Is allowing a church to erect a Nativity display really the establishment of a religion?

Mike S

Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Tim Campbell ([address removed]) from The Cleveland Freethinkers.
To learn more about Tim Campbell, visit his/her member profile

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy