In a message dated 3/11/[masked]:29:43 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[address removed] writes:
Tim and Greg - I suppose you’ll be willing to agree
I have some justification for speaking on behalf of conspiracy
Obviously you have very limited
understanding of them (or us).
Obviously you have limited understanding of basically everything, including
but not limited to the level or degree of my understanding.
Especially since these days of the
internet, particularly youtube, all this inside knowledge you
mentioned is not secret. Of course there is plenty of exagerated
or purely fabricated balderdash that gets emailed around too
Most of this balderdash is disseminated by conspiracy whackos.
Theorists being too gentle a term for many who are out and out whackos.
There are always
low-information/ low-ethics individuals in every segment of society what can
we ever do about things like THAT problem. Most
“conspiracists” fully understand that our ability to protect ourselves from
the conspiracies is very limited, and that our best protection will only come
from wider acceptance and understanding of those conspiracies (whichever ones
are actually true).
There are conspiracies and then there are conspiracies. The vast
majority of conspiracy theories require too much fore-knowledge and expertise
from the alleged conspirators.
Which brings me to the fact that the
sincere conspiracy theorists are only in search of the truth and finding
ways to inspire more people also search for it, instead of simply
accepting everything the mainstream media tells us, without
No, you're mostly nuts looking for attention.
It’s not intrigue that’s
swirling above our (or your) heads that concerns us, it’s the
truth swirling up there, which is so unknown and so rejected by most
Americans that we obsess about. It’s people like
you who are so enslaved to your prejudices and paradigms about what to
believe/ disbelieve that worries
Again, you're mostly nuts looking for attention. You really do not
understand the rest of us.
Let’s dive directly into one of the hottest conspiracy theories - the
one about what caused the WTC buildings to fall. Do
you believe everything Bush and Cheney and their 9-11 so called investigators
said we should believe? What about Richard Gage and the
1,500 other credentialed experts who agree with him that the three WTC
buildings weren’t destroyed by just two airliners - do you think
every one of them is lying to us?
Why do you maintain that the conspiracy people are "experts" whereas the
actual investigators from several separate agencies (FBI and NYPD among others)
are "so-called" investigators? You prejudice your statement right from the
get-go without even thinking about it.
do they all have some shady
subversive agenda causing them to wager their reputations on this
craziness? Here’s a link to their website in case you’d
like to explain how all the things they say are lies or
hallucinations or otherwize untrue: http://www.ae911truth.org/. And then if you have enough curiosity to
look, you might get some good insights from someone who made
a 6 minute youtube particularly about you who seem to get psychological
benefits from ridiculing people who have differing beliefs from the ones
Difference between beliefs and facts. You give Bush and Cheney too
much credit for their abilities to conceive, plan, and execute such an
event. That these two men took full advantage of this event in order to
further their own agendas is certain. To think that they planned
it together is ludicrous. They are not that smart and too many people
with unrelated agendas would need to be involved.
I do not doubt that there are and have been "conspiracies". It is
when whackos take the "work" of pissant malcontents or foreign fundaloons and
decide that "higher ups" did the actual planning rather than simply taking
advantage of what has occurred.
Your posts continue to wander into IrrationalLand!
"Cherish your doubts for doubt is the
attendant of truth; it is the
> servant of discovery. Truth, if it be
truth, arises from each testing
> stronger" -- Robert T. Weston