I would like to apologize for the delay in my response. I was
taken ill with a rather nasty bout of strep.
All I want is to see the evidence that lead to the conclusions
of the N.I.S.T. report.
My issue here is openness in Government.
The doors to Government are closing not opening.
This administration is even more secretive than Bush 43.
This administration, despite their lip service as done more
to prosecute whistle blowers than to encourage and protect
But Canterbury says it's still "not definitively clear" yet what
the impact of Obama's
signing statement will be. "It's going to be incredibly important
for Congress to
conduct rigorous oversight to ensure the law is not weakened," she
And what are the chance of Congress preforming any kind of
let alone rigorous.
On[masked]:44, Rick wrote:
Hi. I hate to put it this way, but you do realize that it's
430 in the morning and your subject matter is going on 12
years old. Even if there was foul play (and I'm not sayin
that) there is no REMAINING evidence to be examined. If
it's impossible to prove anything with what you already
have, then you're done. File it with the Kennedy
assassination. And...of course we don't know everything
about what happened that day; it was chaos.