addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwchatcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-crosscrosseditemptyheartfacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgoogleimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinmagnifying-glassmailminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1outlookpersonplusprice-ribbonImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruseryahoo

Re: [humanism-174] regarding TC3

From: user 7.
Sent on: Friday, April 5, 2013 3:34 AM

43 posts.  96 counting the other one.  I like a good debate, even a heated debate, for the simple fact that it makes you think, but this is just arguing...which, in my experience, makes you stop thinking.  I'm just going to start deleting this thread without reading it.  It's gone to pointless.

On Apr 5,[masked]:31 AM, "Mark R. Orel" <[address removed]> wrote:
Mr. Campbell: 

Campaign, an operation energetically pursued to
accomplished a purpose. 

I felt and feel that TC3 should be removed from the group.  It is my right to think so and to
propose that action


So, yes you did mount a campaign.  It just didn't go as
far as you hoped. 

As for not commenting on things that I do not agree with or on comments I do not like, once again,
none of your damned business.  I will comment when I like and about whatever interests me enough
to comment.  The only limit on me is the constraints of 25 posts per day.  Other than that, I will do
whatever I please and whatever pleases me.  Should my comments offend the group or roll into the
absurd and insane, then anyone can complain and Mark and Marni have the right to chastise me or
toss me.  You have the same right as I do.  Comment away, whine away, or keep your opinions to
yourself--all up to you!  But if you make an absurd comment, expect to be called on it.  Whether by
me or by Randy or by anyone else here. 

Now Here we have good example of pretzel logic.   At first you say it's "none of
my damned business"  Then you whine for a bit and admit to being a hedonist. 
And then you say it's okay for me to comment.  

You and TC3 offered separate scenarios to explain the collapse of the WTC towers that I
(and most everyone else in the group, btw) found absurd. You admittedly offered no evidence
for implausible explanations 


You have a keen ability to see the irrelevant and ignore the salient. 
And you offered no evidence either.  Had you read the words I wrote
you might have understood that was in fact my point.  You gave me
your opinion, you shared no evidence. 

I like the 'Valley Girl' impression, or maybe that's the real you...
whatever. 


M. Orel



On[masked]:48, Tim Campbell wrote:
In a message dated 4/4/2013 7:32:01 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [address removed] writes:
You really are a petty piece of hypocritical scum. 

You engaged with TC3, you've agreed with him on
occasion.  And now you are taking it upon your self
to mount a campaign to remove another person from
this group because you find him tedious. 

If you don't like what he says then don't engage him. 
But we all know that won't happen your ego will not
allow it.  You seem to be compelled to respond to
every comment on every thread whether you have
something to say or not.  And as tedious as I find you
I would not ask that you be removed from the group. 

 
Whatever!  First, I have not mounted any campaign.  I felt and feel that TC3 should be removed from the group.  It is my right to think so and to propose that action. You and he and every other member of this group have the same right.  Motive or reason is not relevant. The choice to do so or not to do so is entirely up to the member.  The simple fact is that the DECISION to actually remove someone is neither yours nor mine. It is up to the group managers--Mark T and Marni--to make that determination.
 
I wrote one post in which I suggested that TC3 be removed. THAT is a "campaign"?  This issue was handled nicely by Mark and while I do not necessarily agree with his decision, I have no problem abiding by it.
 
As for not commenting on things that I do not agree with or on comments I do not like, once again, none of your damned business.  I will comment when I like and about whatever interests me enough to comment.  The only limit on me is the constraints of 25 posts per day.  Other than that, I will do whatever I please and whatever pleases me.  Should my comments offend the group or roll into the absurd and insane, then anyone can complain and Mark and Marni have the right to chastise me or toss me.  You have the same right as I do.  Comment away, whine away, or keep your opinions to yourself--all up to you!  But if you make an absurd comment, expect to be called on it.  Whether by me or by Randy or by anyone else here.
 
You and TC3 offered separate scenarios to explain the collapse of the WTC towers that I (and most everyone else in the group, btw) found absurd. You admittedly offered no evidence for implausible explanations (TC3 offered only cabalistic occult symbolism as evidence). I explained in detail why your scenarios were implausible and now you whine that you were only conjecturing and just "have questions". 
 
Whatever. 
 
Tim Campbell 








--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Mark R. Orel ([address removed]) from The Cleveland Freethinkers.
To learn more about Mark R. Orel, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | [address removed]

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy