addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwchatcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrosseditemptyheartfacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgoogleimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinmagnifying-glassmailminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1outlookpersonplusprice-ribbonImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruseryahoo

Re: [humanism-174] definition of atheism (again)

From: Mark T.
Sent on: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:35 AM
For myself, I find that definition too limited. Do I really have to put "naturalist" in front of "atheist" in order to properly describe myself? A naturalistic system of knowledge is clearly implied.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Ginger <[address removed]> wrote:
Michael V wrote: " Plus, there are few atheists out there who would say that they are 100% certain there is no god; doesn't such a concession make them a non-atheist? "

I define atheism as having no active belief in God. Not to mention that we don't apply this 100% certainty rule to anything else.

Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Ginger ([address removed]) from The Cleveland Freethinkers.
To learn more about Ginger, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup Support: [address removed]
632 Broadway, New York, NY 10012 USA

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy