Mailing List Archive

Subject Sender Date
Re: [humanism-174] Fwd: A comment was just posted for Star Party! - Tim C. Aug 13, 2010 11:06 AM
RE: [humanism-174] Fwd: A comment was just posted for Star Party! - Bruce O. Aug 13, 2010 10:56 AM
Re: [humanism-174] birds and the bees - I'm going to try and be as st user 9. Aug 13, 2010 10:50 AM
Fwd: A comment was just posted for Star Party! - Tim C. Aug 13, 2010 10:03 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Re: BP station owners suffer - Tim C. Aug 13, 2010 9:54 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Re: BP station owners suffer - Ginger, you never disappoint me... --- From: Ginger <[address removed]> mardell Aug 13, 2010 9:16 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Re: BP station owners suffer - Point of fact, it's likely that the gas you get from a "BP" station doesn't even originate from "BP Jay D. G. Aug 13, 2010 9:07 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Re: BP station owners suffer - I want to reiterate that my main concern isn't the station owners (although I titled the thread tha Ginger Aug 13, 2010 8:45 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Re: BP station owners suffer - Remember the days of having your gas pumped? I bet women would love to have that service back, Ginger Aug 13, 2010 8:41 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Re: BP station owners suffer - Tim C. Aug 13, 2010 8:33 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Re: BP station owners suffer - This thread ties in with the WWII thread.? The civilians are tied to the warmongers by association.? On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Jim Pfeil < [address removed] user 2. Aug 13, 2010 7:23 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Re: BP station owners suffer - Preview not available user 1. Aug 13, 2010 12:48 AM
Re: [humanism-174] "True Atheist" - Mark R. O. Aug 12, 2010 11:51 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Re: BP station owners suffer - I generally agree with that, that is, if I actually though boycotting them would do any good. It smacks of Ginger Aug 12, 2010 11:32 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 11:22 PM
Re: BP station owners suffer - While the station owners didn't cause the massive leak, BP is the bed they made for them Matt Aug 12, 2010 11:12 PM
Onion article - Ginger Aug 12, 2010 8:27 PM
Re: [humanism-174] birds and the bees - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 6:07 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 6:01 PM
birds and the bees - Josh and I Ginger Aug 12, 2010 5:40 PM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - So if you are infertile, no sex for you. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: Tim Campbell <[address removed]> Sender: [address removed] Date: Thu, 12 Aug 201 Bruce O. Aug 12, 2010 5:38 PM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 5:36 PM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - Sex for pleasure is ok so long as it is a side effect of sex for procreation: Ginger Aug 12, 2010 5:26 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - user 1. Aug 12, 2010 5:06 PM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - Well then, isn't practicing the rhythm method kind of like trying to fool God. If God puts the Jay D. G. Aug 12, 2010 5:06 PM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 4:52 PM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 4:52 PM
Re: [humanism-174] feminist mormon? - To paraphrase the Evangelicals, "With God on your side, all lies are possible." Jay Jay D. G. Aug 12, 2010 4:50 PM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 4:49 PM
RE: [humanism-174] feminist mormon? - Bruce O. Aug 12, 2010 4:36 PM
Re: [humanism-174] feminist mormon? - It does make the deity "Bob" ever so much more credible. Can't imagine "Bob" staring into a hat Jay D. G. Aug 12, 2010 4:30 PM
RE: [humanism-174] feminist mormon? - Stranger is putting it mildly. What is stranger than the religion itself is that anyone could buy into something so completely crackers. The lemming effect and gullablity never ceases to amaze me.... ---- Bruce Orcutt wrote: > I've user 9. Aug 12, 2010 3:47 PM
Re: [humanism-174] feminist mormon? - She mentions not smoking or drinking. I thought they also couldn't have caffeine. That's the real cha Ginger Aug 12, 2010 3:31 PM
RE: [humanism-174] feminist mormon? - Bruce O. Aug 12, 2010 2:49 PM
Neil DeGrasse Tyson in Cleveland - http://www.playhousesquare.org­/default.asp?playhousesquare=5­8&objId=738 My wife just told me she is getting us tickets for my birthday. Very cool! -- Nathan [address removed] user 9. Aug 12, 2010 2:39 PM
Re: [humanism-174] feminist mormon? - I read the article. I think it would be a lot, lot easier to be a feminist and dump the Mormon Jay D. G. Aug 12, 2010 2:36 PM
anatomy of angry atheist follow-up - Ginger Aug 12, 2010 1:41 PM
feminist mormon? - Ginger Aug 12, 2010 1:37 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Mosque at ground zero? - It seems like this building's opponents have over-generalized its location. The sit Matt Aug 12, 2010 12:18 PM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - Please not that at the end of the article it states that the church's position on artificial contrace Jay D. G. Aug 12, 2010 11:36 AM
NYTimes: Last Laugh Is on German Far Right in Court Case - From The New York Times: Last Laugh Is on German Far Right in Court Case A far-right group lost a major court case after a judge ruled that a satirical anti-racist clothing label depicting a stork that looks like Hitler was not Miguel Aug 12, 2010 11:29 AM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - yes, I was correct- http://www.catholic Ginger Aug 12, 2010 11:25 AM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - Because it's sex for pleasure only, not for procreation. (my guess) In that case, infertile people Ginger Aug 12, 2010 11:23 AM
NYTimes: Tibetan Writer?s Intellectual Journey Leads to Trial - Preview not available Miguel Aug 12, 2010 11:22 AM
Re: [humanism-174] "True Atheist" - Can't we just drop the whole user 9. Aug 12, 2010 10:18 AM
Re: [humanism-174] "True Atheist" - Mark, You user 9. Aug 12, 2010 10:13 AM
Re: [humanism-174] "True Atheist" - Mark-O, what you are describing is an apatheist. As far as I'm concerned, an atheist by any other moniker is still a "true" atheist. Either one thinks there is a god, or they don't. A notable exception would be the "hones Mark T. Aug 12, 2010 9:36 AM
Power of Purchases - What will make you happier: buying goods or buying experiences? Find out here: http://59seconds.wordpress.com­/2009/07/01/in-59- Josh Aug 12, 2010 9:25 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Evil is kind of a moving target. Pat Robertson on TV is really stupid and annoying. Pat R Jay D. G. Aug 12, 2010 9:21 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - In addition to showing that the Japanese mainland was vulnerable It was great for the moral of the U.S. citizens. On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:28 PM, William Henley < wrhbill@ user 2. Aug 12, 2010 9:15 AM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - See the Lawrence Krauss article in this months issue of Scientific American where he takes members of Jay D. G. Aug 12, 2010 9:08 AM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 8:48 AM
Re: [humanism-174] "True Atheist" - This was discussed at the CFINO meeting yesterday.? An atheist is one who is without god.? a skeptic is one who arrives at a decision by examining the evidence. Mark should care about religion when it infringes on the rights of others or when they esp user 2. Aug 12, 2010 8:47 AM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] Mosque at ground zero? - It's obviously one of those issues that makes for very good campaign fodder for politicians and inter Jay D. G. Aug 12, 2010 8:47 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 8:45 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 8:36 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 8:34 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 12, 2010 8:33 AM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] Mosque at ground zero? - Preview not available Adam B. Aug 12, 2010 8:10 AM
Re: [humanism-174] NYTimes: Farmers Lean to Truce on Animals? Close Quarters - Preview not available Marni T. Aug 12, 2010 8:00 AM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - user 7. Aug 12, 2010 6:20 AM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] Mosque at ground zero? - user 7. Aug 12, 2010 6:14 AM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - user 7. Aug 12, 2010 6:13 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Keeping our importance in perspective. - Everything we are, had to h Jerry C. Aug 12, 2010 4:33 AM
NYTimes: Farmers Lean to Truce on Animals? Close Quarters - Preview not available Miguel Aug 12, 2010 2:55 AM
Re: [humanism-174] "True Atheist" - My definition of a true atheist is one who doe Mark R. O. Aug 12, 2010 1:21 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Randall said: "I dont think examining America's uneven past is at all unpatriotic either. If the country is to retain its greatness it must be willing to examine its flaws and misdirected moments." ? E Mark T. Aug 12, 2010 12:33 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - It does not matter to me; the question is how Mark R. O. Aug 12, 2010 12:28 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Then you do not hate Islam or at least hate it Mark R. O. Aug 11, 2010 10:42 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Preview not available Bruce O. Aug 11, 2010 10:33 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Are you saying that one can Mark R. O. Aug 11, 2010 10:19 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Keeping our importance in perspective. - I'm planning on coming. Probably brining my daughter too. I didn't say the gas clouds aren't beautiful, just dumb. Frank S. Aug 11, 2010 10:10 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 11, 2010 9:49 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Keeping our importance in perspective. - Tim C. Aug 11, 2010 9:42 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Keeping our importance in perspective. - Me too. The universe may have more spinning atoms than me, but, so what? I've got my family and Bach. Try to beat that, dumb gas cloud! On Aug 10, 2010, at 10:29 PM, Randall Tiedman wrote: > Hmmmm.... I feel qui Frank S. Aug 11, 2010 9:35 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 11, 2010 9:20 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - If their out there I have not been exposed to them and being liberal you would think they would cross my path occasionally. I suppose the opposite might be true of the extreme right wing with the love or leave it and america can do no wrong themes. I gues user 9. Aug 11, 2010 8:48 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 11, 2010 8:03 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - user 1. Aug 11, 2010 7:28 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - On Aug 11, 2010, at 6:10 PM, William Henley wrote: > (But those who like to view the U.S. as a fundamentally evil country... Must we continue to have these straw-men erected every time someone dares to criticize US policy or free-m James P. Aug 11, 2010 7:16 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - It's also worth noting that the first occupation troops to land on Japanese soil met no resistance an Jay D. G. Aug 11, 2010 6:48 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Of course people were never eager to send their sons off to war and that is completely reasonable. It's my belief though we would have never let europe go down in flames to be controlled by Hitler. Im sure Churchill eventually would have convinced FDR of user 9. Aug 11, 2010 6:44 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Do you think that some liberlals view the U.S as a evil country? I dont know any! ---- William Henley wrote: > Adam's understanding pretty much matches mine (as somewhat of a WWII > history buff). The U.S. under FDR had raised str user 9. Aug 11, 2010 6:39 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - No one ever claimed that politicians are particularly rational members of our species. Jay Jay D. G. Aug 11, 2010 6:35 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Also, I think there's a tendency for an island based people to perceptually underestimate the size of Jay D. G. Aug 11, 2010 6:33 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - user 1. Aug 11, 2010 6:21 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - user 1. Aug 11, 2010 6:09 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 11, 2010 4:47 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 11, 2010 4:41 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 11, 2010 4:38 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - The pearl Harbor attack was to cripple the US fleet.? It would have succeeded except the aircraft carriers were out on maneuvers.? On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Jay D. Gardner < user 2. Aug 11, 2010 3:52 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - The Doolittle attack early in the war was a reprisal for the Pearl harbor attack.? Its purpose was to instill fear that the mainland of Japan was vulnerable to attack. On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tim Campbell user 2. Aug 11, 2010 3:46 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Based upon my reading of the history, after the military effectively seized power in Japan it was dec Jay D. G. Aug 11, 2010 3:17 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Preview not available Adam B. Aug 11, 2010 2:20 PM
RE: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Bruce O. Aug 11, 2010 2:18 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - One question I've always had that I've never found a good answer to: & Gary Aug 11, 2010 1:50 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Tim C. Aug 11, 2010 1:19 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Nagasaki- 65 Years On - Do you want those virgins crispy or tender? Jay Jay D. G. Aug 11, 2010 1:10 PM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - That would be my sentiments about the Catholic Church as well. On that count, I'm in accord wit Jay D. G. Aug 11, 2010 1:08 PM
Re: [humanism-174] End hostility toward Pope - Tim C. Aug 11, 2010 12:46 PM

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy