Mailing List Archive

Subject Sender Date
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - Like the invisible hand of the market? Sent on the Now Network��� from my Sprint�� BlackBerry From: William Henley <[address removed]> Date: Sun, 14 Mar[masked]:10:18 -0400 Miguel Mar 14, 2010 7:44 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - Good points but slightly exaggerated. I dont think liberals beleve the government can do everything but on the other hand they dont believe a free market can cure all our problems. I want a sensible mix. I dont understand why we have to police the whole w user 9. Mar 14, 2010 7:42 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - user 1. Mar 14, 2010 6:10 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - user 1. Mar 14, 2010 6:00 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - What about: You can only criticize white people Nobody is poor due to their own fault You can Ginger Mar 14, 2010 4:54 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/­yn Ginger Mar 14, 2010 4:48 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Texas Board of Ed at It Again/Stil - The Non-Prophets, 9.4 does a good job of discussing this. Ginger Mar 14, 2010 4:33 PM
Check out Secretive Catholic Order Founded by Accused Pedophile Under Fire - - Tim C. Mar 14, 2010 4:28 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - I would have more bend in me to the conservative point of view if in fact there were at least 5-10 republicans who agreed with Dems on health care. The republican party has been taken over by ultra conservatives who will cast out any who question their po user 9. Mar 14, 2010 4:15 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - Tim C. Mar 14, 2010 2:56 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - Tim C. Mar 14, 2010 2:52 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - Tim C. Mar 14, 2010 2:43 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - Tim C. Mar 14, 2010 2:39 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Re: Re: Court Ruling on "Under God"... But Which One??? - I have already suggested that idea to my religious friends (the reasonable ones) and they have rejected it. They feel their child needs to be grounded ina structure and if they reject it later thats up to them. I did not mention that seems to be brainwa user 9. Mar 14, 2010 1:43 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - Humanity, as in all the human animals on Earth together as a whole- progress, as in the tendency move beyond more primitive ways of thinking and acting, while at the same time becoming more informed about the universe around us. I think it would be v Mark T. Mar 14, 2010 1:33 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - Tim C. Mar 14, 2010 1:18 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - I think a dogmatic *person* can make any idea dogmatic. And to me it's clear that there are dogmatist Ginger Mar 14, 2010 1:02 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - One possible piece of liberal dogma: ? Humanity will progress. On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Tim Campbell < camtimothy@ Mark T. Mar 14, 2010 1:01 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Texas Board of Ed at It Again/Stil - The should rename the Texas board the "Texas Board of mis-Education" or the Texas Board of Chr Jay D. G. Mar 14, 2010 12:12 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Liberal Dogma? - Tim C. Mar 14, 2010 11:42 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Texas Board of Ed at It Again/Stil - Tim C. Mar 14, 2010 11:36 AM
Liberal Dogma? - Mark brought up an excellent question about Liberalism and it's tenets, is it dogmatic? If so, how?? -- "They can't see anymore how their wide eyes have made them blind in spite of themselves."-Mushroomhead­ Miguel Mar 14, 2010 10:15 AM
Re: Re: Court Ruling on "Under God"... But Which One??? - Mark, Wouldn't that be great if your idea (quoted below) actually came to be? Kids would actually be given a balanced philosophical introduction a Suzy W. Mar 14, 2010 10:06 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Texas Board of Ed at It Again/Stil - Preview not available Nathan Mar 14, 2010 9:02 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Texas Board of Ed at It Again/Stil - >> "I reject the notion by the left of a constitutional separation of church and state," said David Bradley, a conservative from Beaumont who works in real estate. "I have $1,000 for the charity of your choice if you can find it in the Constitution." T Adam B. Mar 14, 2010 6:18 AM
3 Rulings Find No Link to Vaccines and Autism - 3 Rulings Find No Link to Vaccines and Autism Josh III :- Josh Mar 14, 2010 3:26 AM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - user 7. Mar 14, 2010 12:14 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Texas Board of Ed at It Again/Stil - Tim C. Mar 13, 2010 12:33 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Texas Board of Ed at It Again/Stil - Tim C. Mar 13, 2010 12:27 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Texas Board of Ed at It Again/Stil - Fine, then... it should be a mandate that all U.S. public schoolchildren have comparative religion as a required course, starting at grade 4. The course should include a comprehensive overview of all religious viewpoints, including atheism & agno Mark T. Mar 13, 2010 12:21 PM
Texas Board of Ed at It Again/Stil - Matt Mar 13, 2010 11:29 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Dilbert Shui - I wish I had remembered to ask about this when I was there. Ginger Mar 13, 2010 10:43 AM
Re: Court Ruling on "Under God"... But Which One??? - Don M Mar 13, 2010 9:37 AM
Re: [humanism-174] State of the Internet - How do we know it's all true??? Ginger Mar 12, 2010 5:54 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - user 1. Mar 12, 2010 5:23 PM
Under Yet Another God - Sorry! Here is the pic with text... still figuring out Picasa. These pictures were sent with Picasa, from Google. Try it out here: http://picasa.google.com/ Mark T. Mar 12, 2010 4:49 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Court Ruling on "Under God"... But Which One??? - Hahahaha!!! Very appropos (or however you spell it :) ? I've attached another quickie... On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Ray V < Mark T. Mar 12, 2010 4:47 PM
RE: [humanism-174] Court Ruling on "Under God"... But Which One??? - Excellent! You should also label the Goddess (Courts) and the poor dude on the ground (Separation of Church and State) We are now paying for Bush's stacking of the court with conservative lunk-heads. I'm looking at you Roe v. Wade! -----Origina Ray V Mar 12, 2010 4:35 PM
RE: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - The "under god" phrase makes a repugnant ceremony just a little bit wor Brett Mar 12, 2010 4:23 PM
Court Ruling on "Under God"... But Which One??? - There are thousands of 'em. Unless the Supreme Court takes up the "Pledge" issue, the recent ruling in favor of "under God" might be the "last word", so "they" say... I am sure that conservative Xtians, in their general smarminess, view the recent r Mark T. Mar 12, 2010 4:05 PM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010­/03/07/christianity-crucifying­-the-constitution/ On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Brian Ruschel Miguel Mar 12, 2010 3:18 PM
Re: Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - user 7. Mar 12, 2010 3:14 PM
Re: [humanism-174] More Creationist Non-science - Makes you kind of wonder if they have portraits of Jesus in a lab coat peering into a microscope.&n Jay D. G. Mar 12, 2010 2:05 PM
What Darwin Got Wrong - http://www.theness.com/roguesg­allery/?p=1470 Ginger Mar 12, 2010 1:21 PM
State of the Internet - State of the Internet Josh III :-) Josh Mar 12, 2010 1:20 PM
Re: [humanism-174] More Creationist Non-science - Tim C. Mar 12, 2010 8:52 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Chief exorcist says Devil is in Vatican - *Sigh*.... let's face it, these people are insane. While religion in general appears to be on the wane, the religious leaders seem to be getting crazier & crazier. See this thread on our message board for other fine examples: ? Mark T. Mar 11, 2010 11:34 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Chief exorcist says Devil is in Vatican - I've always suspected that. All those crazy costumes give me the creeps. Jay Jay D. G. Mar 11, 2010 11:26 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - Reducing religion to a custom or cultural oddity kind of takes back to the Roman Republic when hono Jay D. G. Mar 11, 2010 11:22 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - The pledge was a post civil war attempt at national unity: "...One Nation, Indivisible, with liberty and justice for All".? The author - a minister (Methodist?) - was dismissed because for preaching socialism from his pulpit.? The words "un chuck p. Mar 11, 2010 10:07 PM
RE: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - Ray V Mar 11, 2010 8:45 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - Preview not available Nathan Mar 11, 2010 8:20 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - Tim C. Mar 11, 2010 7:31 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - Tim C. Mar 11, 2010 7:30 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - user 1. Mar 11, 2010 6:55 PM
How I see our challenges - I'm going to pimp myself and a post i wrote ( Mikkel F. Mar 11, 2010 5:09 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - I guess so... a mere formality, a ceremonial element, a pip-pip, a trifling reference, a much-ado-about-nothing. We can take that ball & run with it :) On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Ginger < Mark T. Mar 11, 2010 5:09 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - So their God is Ginger Mar 11, 2010 4:56 PM
Court: 'Under God' in Pledge is constitutional - "The language is pat Mark T. Mar 11, 2010 4:43 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Video: Glenn Beck Attacks Richard Scott - me too! fun..like it --- On Thu, 3/11/10, Josh <[address removed]> wrote: mardell Mar 11, 2010 4:29 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Video: Glenn Beck Attacks Richard Scott - Wow . That shocked me for a moment! Josh III Josh Mar 11, 2010 2:10 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Preview not available Jill M. Mar 11, 2010 7:22 AM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Preview not available Tim T Mar 11, 2010 5:45 AM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Preview not available Mark T. Mar 11, 2010 12:35 AM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Tim C. Mar 10, 2010 8:48 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - My suspicion is that if they tried that at a black funeral they would quickly have the crap beaten Jay D. G. Mar 10, 2010 8:19 PM
RE: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Mark B. Mar 10, 2010 7:20 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Nathan wrote: > What is the difference between assault and assault-because-the-other-guy-­is-black? A lot, depending on the circumstances. The idea is that "hate crimes" are reflective of a greater pattern of harassment James P. Mar 10, 2010 5:13 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm NOT on Fred Phelp's side - Let's see what the constitution has to say: James P. Mar 10, 2010 5:01 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Tim C. Mar 10, 2010 4:06 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Tim C. Mar 10, 2010 4:03 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Tim C. Mar 10, 2010 4:01 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - I'm still not sure how you are getting that th Nathan Mar 10, 2010 3:59 PM
RE: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Mark B. Mar 10, 2010 3:46 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Tim C. Mar 10, 2010 3:41 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - What is the difference between ass Nathan Mar 10, 2010 3:30 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - While I generally agree with the right of these nutcases to spew whatever they wish in a public ven Jay D. G. Mar 10, 2010 3:06 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Who says they are not on public property outside of the funeral? Ginger Mar 10, 2010 3:04 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - The only way to define or determine someone's intent is to ask them. Unf Michael V. Mar 10, 2010 3:00 PM
Atheists in Heaven - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v­=TLGGKraKmXc -- "They can't see anymore how their wide eyes have made them blind in spite of themselves."-Mushroomhead­ Miguel Mar 10, 2010 2:30 PM
RE: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Mark B. Mar 10, 2010 2:09 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - I think we all agree that what they are doing is desp Nathan Mar 10, 2010 1:44 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - I think if protesters came into a funeral home uninvi Nathan Mar 10, 2010 1:40 PM
Pentagon Gunman a Conspiracy Theorist & 9/11 Truther - Pentagon Gunman a Conspiracy Theorist & 9/11 Truther Josh Mar 10, 2010 1:38 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - How did you arrive at that conclusion? What I mean is why do believe them to be the same thing at least in this regard? Sent on the Now Network��� from my Sprint�� BlackBerry From: Don Boos <[address removed] Miguel Mar 10, 2010 1:26 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Does it really matter if it's deemed a private or public affair? It's a funeral.&n Michael V. Mar 10, 2010 1:21 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - How are they different? I would think that when you pay for a funeral it's the same as renting space for a party. On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Michael < Don B. Mar 10, 2010 1:13 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - But are cemeteries private? Free speech does indeed have it's limitations but a private party and hospital are different from a funeral Sent on the Now Network��� from my Sprint�� BlackBerry From: Don Boos < Miguel Mar 10, 2010 1:00 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - A funeral is a private party. What if you were holding an outdoor party and a church group came into your backyard and started preaching?�� Or if they used bullhorns outside a hospital. ��Free speech has it's limitations. Don B. Mar 10, 2010 12:51 PM
Re: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - I was just about to defend Fred Phelps and totally disagree with you Michael but your last question gave me pause. I would hesitantly say free speech is the right Miguel Mar 10, 2010 12:43 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Why Didn't We Think of This? (#653) - I have heard of "God in the machine," but that only works for the protagonist. Who does "ghost in the bottle" apply to? James P. Mar 10, 2010 12:10 PM
RE: [humanism-174] I'm on Fred Phelp's side - Mark B. Mar 10, 2010 12:06 PM
RE: [humanism-174] atheist freedom of speech violated by police - Good find, Richard. I like. At least the first cop had sense Brett Mar 10, 2010 11:55 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Atheists Evolved? National Geographic with more perspective. - I've always suspected this and now that I've gotten older and maybe a little smarter I'm finding it Jay D. G. Mar 10, 2010 9:26 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Why Didn't We Think of This? (#653) - Over the last 18 years, I have spent a good deal of my hard earned money on bottles containing "spirits", but never thousands of dollars for a "ghost" in a bottle. On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Mark Randy Mar 10, 2010 1:35 AM
Re: [humanism-174] Limbaugh: I'll Leave US If Health Care ReformPasses (VIDEO) - ?Limbaugh should have left the country years ago. Many years ago, he railed against drug addicts, claiming that we should take all of the drug offenders in our prisons and send them to Europe, where they "coddle" dopers and give them free, clean Randy Mar 10, 2010 1:32 AM
meetup's "new view" - As of tomorrow, all meetup.com group websites will be switched to what they call the "new view"... hate it. ? It is crappy, cluttered, confusing... hate it! The central focus of the ho Mark T. Mar 10, 2010 12:35 AM
Why Didn't We Think of This? (#653) - Two "ghosts" in glass vials sell for $2,850 in NZ money: ? BIDDING BRISK FOR BOTTLED SPOOKS ? And the follow Mark T. Mar 9, 2010 11:03 PM
Re: [humanism-174] A Goddess for every need - Well, the Egyptian Goddess Hathor could certainly help me navigate my morning coffee: ? HATH Mark T. Mar 9, 2010 10:39 PM
Re: [humanism-174] Limbaugh: I'll Leave US If Health Care ReformPasses (VIDEO) - Preview not available Tim T Mar 9, 2010 9:47 PM

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy