Re: [dfa-23] DO YOU AGREE? SD DFA Seering Committee Voted TO Censure Diane Feinstein

From: Leigh
Sent on: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:41 PM
I agree and will go one step further I think we should recall her.
Leigh Mahon
Delegate 76th AD

Carol Changus <[address removed]> wrote:
DO YOU AGREE? SD DFA Seering Committee Voted TO Censure Diane Feinstein.



What it means is that SD DFA along with 10+ other counties in CA DFA, and the Courage Campaign and a few other organizations to censure the Senator. We are supportng the resolution calling for the California Democratic Party to censure the Senator DiFi. This is a group action. No signature is needed since most steering committee members agreed to censure. Of Course, you can send her an email, individually. Most of us have already.

It is a way of holding Dianne Feinstein a publicly accountable. To make the Senator aware that we are serious. To voic as a group our disapproval of her actions and votes in the Senate. And, we are all watching the Senate, and want her to vote with the majority of her party!

It has to go to the CA Democratic executive committee, tomorrow. We don't know if it will make it out of there. Or if it will go farther in the process.

Thus this help? Let me know.

Carol


Hey everyone -


Big day on the censure DiFi front, post-Courage Campaign email blast.

Mal Burnstein, Janet Stromberg, Sandra Yolles, East Bay for Democracy, Karen Bernal, etc all deserve a great deal of credit for pushing this forward (I played a part as well, of course, but that's besides the point).

Chances of passage are slim, but that may depend on how high the volume is come Saturday.

This is a very DeanFA-driven event. Still hoping DFA-National can reflect that back to the grassroots before Friday.

Meanwhile, check out Bob's post on Calitics below --- he does a great job of rounding up multiple links from blogs and the MSM. I haven't had time to read more than a third of them...
Dianne Feinstein Censure Resonates with Democrats
by: Bob Brigham)



This is a defining moment for the California Democratic Party and there will be a lot of people watching what happens.
UPDATE: It resonates and has momentum. Fire Dog Lake and the San Francisco Bay Guardian Politics Blog and Amor Mundi and Maha Blog and Chris Weigant and Later on and the front page of Daily Kos. The primary story is now up to 860 comments. You can censure Dianne Feinstein yourself.
-------

Something is happening here. I'm curious what you guys think it is...




Too many times Senator Feinstein has failed to represent the people of California. Now she has announced that this Thursday she will support President Bush for the third time in two months. And it all comes down to Senator Feinstein's role on the Judiciary Committee.

Strike One: A Bush nominee for the federal bench, Leslie Southwick has a long history of rulings in lower courts that violate equality laws. Feinstein cast a deciding vote to give him a lifetime seat.

Strike Two: Michael Mukasey, nominated for Attorney General, refused to say he would oppose torture. But Feinstein voted to send his confirmation to the Senate floor anyway.

Now she's poised for her third bad vote in a row, on a rework of the FISA Act -- the law that's supposed to protect us all against illegal wiretapping.

When the Bush administration didn't want to follow this law, they asked major telephone companies like AT&T and Verizon to help. Several phone companies broke the law to help Dick Cheney read our emails and listen to our phone calls.

They knew it was illegal. But they didn't expect to get caught.

Now that they did, the Bush administration is trying to protect AT&T and others from lawsuits by granting retroactive immunity for breaking the law. The Senate Judiciary Committee can kill this bill if all ten Democrats vote against it.

Strike Three: Senator Feinstein is the only Democrat who says she'll vote for it.

Please call Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid right now and demand he remove Senator Feinstein from the committee and replace her with a Democrat who will stand up to President Bush's abuse of power.

Senator Harry Reid
[masked]

Please report your call and let us know how it went:
http://www.DemocracyforAmerica.com/CallReport

Our elected officials are supposed to represent the will of their constituents when they vote. In a state the size of California, almost nobody could represent everybody all the time. But too often, Diane Feinstein votes against the people of California.

One of our Senators is a true representitive. In 2004, there were questions about the fairness of the presidential vote in Ohio. A lot of DFA members asked our other Senator, Barbara Boxer, to oppose accepting the results in the Senate. She told her staff if enough Californians asked her to, she would. Well, enough of us did and Senator Boxer protested that vote on the floor of the Senate.

But, before the Iraq invasion, many people contacted Senator Feinstein and asked her to vote against authorization. I did. And I got an email back saying, as a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Senator Feinstein felt she had access to information I didn't. So, despite communications from "tens of thousands of Californians" asking her to vote against it, she was going to ignore us. It was more polite than that. But it was still a blatant refusal to represent Californians and we all know how it turned out.

The first vote on retroactive immunity for phone companies is Thursday. Please take action today. Senator Feinstein won't vote with Democrats against the Bush administration's abuse of power. Ask Senator Reid to replace her with someone who will.

Senator Harry Reid
[masked]

Please report your call and let us know how it went:
http://www.DemocracyforAmerica.com/CallReport

Thank you,

-Chris

Chris Finnie
California DFA Member[/b





--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Carol Changus ([address removed]) from The San Diego Democracy for America Meetup Group.
To learn more about Carol Changus, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA



From the Dictionary Of Republicanisms:
alternative energy sources n. - New locations to drill for gas and oil
class warfare n. - Any attempt to raise the minimum wage
climate change n. - The blessed day when the blue states are swallowed by the oceans
democracy n. - A product so extensively exported that the domestic supply is depleted
free markets n. - Halliburton no-bid contracts at taxpayer expense
growth n. - 1. The justification for tax cuts for the rich. 2. What happens to the national debt when Republicans cut taxes on the rich
honesty n. - Lies told in simple declarative sentences-e.g., "Freedom is on the march"
laziness n. - When the poor are not working
leisure time n. - When the wealthy are not working
9/11 n. - Tragedy used to justify any administrative policy, especially if unrelated
pro-life adj. - Valuing human life up until birth
staying the course interj. Slang. - Saying and doing the same stupid thing over and over, regardless of the result


Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage.

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy