didn't reply all first time sorry.
----- Original Message -----
Subject:RE: Re: [transhumanism-14] Re: transhumanism VS intergralism
Date:Sun, 7 Sep[masked]:30:17
From:andrew aaron <[address removed]>
To:Perry Metzger <[address removed]>
some clarification is in order.
1. i did not mean this conservative
blood and soil integralism, not at all.
2. i did mean ken wilbur's works and
3 the idea came from "what is enlighten-
ment" magazine's evolution special and the
fair treatment they gave the TH movement.
4. please forget the integralis of #1 and
take look at wilbur's stuff.
in any case fruitful discussion has started. so thanks.
Perry Metzger wrote:
> Luis <[address removed]> writes:
>> Integralism is a perspective according to which society is an
>> organic unity. It defends social differentiation and hierarchy with
>> co-operation between social classes, transcending conflict between
>> social and economic groups.
> Sounds like socialism/statism. I would say that socialism is
> orthogonal to transhumanism.
> I personally think socialism is a remarkably bad idea, but that's sort
> of irrelevant to transhumanism.
> Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
> This message was sent by Perry Metzger ([address removed]) from New York Transhumanist Association.
> To learn more about Perry Metzger, visit his/her member profile: http://transhuman...
> To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here: http://www.meetup...
> Meetup Support: [address removed]
> 632 Broadway, New York, NY 10012 USA