FW: RE: Re: [transhumanism-14] Re: transhumanism VS intergralism

From: user 2.
Sent on: Saturday, September 6, 2008 11:45 PM
didn't reply all first time sorry.


----- Original Message -----
Subject:RE: Re: [transhumanism-14] Re: transhumanism VS intergralism
Date:Sun, 7 Sep[masked]:30:17
From:andrew aaron <[address removed]>
To:Perry Metzger <[address removed]>

hey,
some clarification is in order.
1.  i did not mean this conservative
 blood and soil integralism, not at all.
2.  i did mean ken wilbur's works and 
philosophy.
3  the idea came from "what is enlighten-
ment" magazine's evolution special and the
fair treatment they gave the TH movement.
4.  please forget the integralis of #1 and
take look at wilbur's stuff.

in any case fruitful discussion has started.  so thanks.
andrew



Perry Metzger wrote:
> Luis <[address removed]> writes:
>> Integralism is a perspective according to which society is an
>> organic unity. It defends social differentiation and hierarchy with
>> co-operation between social classes, transcending conflict between
>> social and economic groups.
> Sounds like socialism/statism. I would say that socialism is
> orthogonal to transhumanism.
> I personally think socialism is a remarkably bad idea, but that's sort
> of irrelevant to transhumanism.
> Perry
> --
> Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
> http://transhuman...­
> This message was sent by Perry Metzger ([address removed]) from New York Transhumanist Association.
> To learn more about Perry Metzger, visit his/her member profile: http://transhuman...­
> To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here: http://www.meetup...­
> Meetup Support: [address removed]
> 632 Broadway, New York, NY 10012 USA


People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy