I've been thinking about this and I think it's a great idea. I would use this feature. Someone said "Filter out the noise", that's exactly how I'd use it.
Only comment: I'd want a "See All" button to appear once any item has been removed. Clicking "See All" would just reset the entire data set, including previously deleted/hidden results.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Julia E.M. <[address removed]>
Suppose a user performs a search and is returned a long list of items. Suppose that many of the items in the list -- maybe even most -- are not going to be interesting to the user. You have an option for the user to save an interesting item. Do you also design an option for the user to grey out, shrink, remove, or otherwise de-emphasize an uninteresting item?
An argument against is that this allows the user to take an additional step and interact with something they don't care about, but the user is more likely to want to interact with something she does care about.
An argument for is that there is a psychological incentive for the user to interact with the item she doesn't want: if she can make it go away, it won't distract her from continuing on with her decision-making. If she makes lots of the items she doesn't want go away, she will end up with a list of items that interest her, which will help her focus on making a final decision. Also, the decision to eliminate an uninteresting item from a set may be easier than the decision to pick an interesting item from a set.
What do you think? Has anyone seen any research or articles about this?
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Julia E.M. ([address removed]) from The Los Angeles User Experience Meetup.
To learn more about Julia E.M., visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages
Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]