addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1linklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Mailing List Archive

Subject Sender Date
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Six Levels a Theory Might Be - Very good point. We have to keep open mind. Unfortunately most of us a laymen and we take scientific truths of the time as a facts. The flat earth theory is very good example. You look outside of window and earth is flat. You can also demonstrate it easy, Stan R. Apr 15, 2012 9:41 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: Tal Golesworthy on TED.com - Can you please use our message board for correspondence to other Physics group members, going forward. The Message Board in the Discussions drop down menu . I'll make it easy..g Betty Apr 14, 2012 11:58 PM
Fwd: Tal Golesworthy on TED.com - Hi guys, We had a nice heated debate and maybe few had a heart problems reading my emails. Don't worry I have found a solution this guy hit two nails at the same time. (1) shown that Stan R. Apr 14, 2012 10:16 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Six Levels a Theory Might Be - One way of looking at information /thories or parts of a theory is that there are six levels or states a theory or information may fall: Theoretical - No evidence for or against yet possible: eg. M-Theory Hypothetical - There is some evidence to sugg user 4. Apr 14, 2012 8:44 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Why in H*LL is this thread still active?!? Didn't Betty, our ORGANIZER and BANHAMMER WEILDER, tell you *people* to move this to the message board? How can we even take you seriously when you can't even follow the simplest of Martin Apr 14, 2012 12:53 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Dave, As I said before you take fiction writer's liberty to twist what I wrote to your end. Can you put up the original whole writing or should I? Sent from my iPad Stan R. Apr 14, 2012 12:38 AM
An unreserved apology to all - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 13, 2012 10:08 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Dave N. Apr 13, 2012 9:22 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 13, 2012 8:55 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hugh G. Apr 13, 2012 8:42 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 13, 2012 8:33 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Ok Stan, I'm bowing out. I've given you every opportunity to stop with the ad hominim attacks. I've also appologized for unintentionally misquoting you. You are fighting yourself at this point. Stop acting l Dave N. Apr 13, 2012 8:26 PM
Fwd: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 13, 2012 8:12 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 13, 2012 8:11 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - David what nonsense. What studies those were the real stuff. People were dying like flies. I am not mad but upset because you twisted my statements and lied. I like to deal with opposition which respects me. Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 7:44 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Justin T. Apr 13, 2012 7:08 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - You don't have to understand the placebo effect in order for it to come into play. It's just a means of putting a stressed out psyche at ease and reducing stress for a short time. Stress reduction can come f Dave N. Apr 13, 2012 6:28 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available George V. Apr 13, 2012 6:13 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Thanks David, I got it. ;) Sent from my iPad On[masked], at 4:44 PM, David < [address removed] > wrote: Dave N. Apr 13, 2012 6:12 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Wow, Stan. Nazi? Really? I honestly wasn't going there. I was truly asking a legitimate question. It was not intended to belittle you in any way. I'm trying to get a handle on why you believe your point of v Dave N. Apr 13, 2012 6:11 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) -  David Apr 13, 2012 4:43 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Easy there, Stan! Sent from my iPad On[masked], at 4:29 PM, Stan Racansky < [address removed] > wrote: Betty Apr 13, 2012 4:42 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - David, I read the 3rd paragraph where you really took a fiction writer's prerogative to change to fit the story. Everything you put as my supposed sayings were twisted, taken out of Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 4:28 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Ok David lets start with history and effectiveness of homeopathy. You can check everything in government archives, medical archives, Internet etc. Once you finished a have a credible response instead of "tea Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 4:20 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Cool, thanks Betty. ;) Dave Noel Cell:[masked] Home:[masked] On[masked], at 2:59 PM, Betty < [address removed] Dave N. Apr 13, 2012 3:25 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hi Andi and David. For those interested in continuing with this discussion ..or not,..I started a new discussion for the above subject on our physics message board. Here's the Betty Apr 13, 2012 2:59 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - David Apr 13, 2012 12:36 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - David Apr 13, 2012 12:29 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Yes, I consider Homeopathy and therapeutic touch to be the height of pseudoscience. If they had clear cut experiments that didn't count on the placebo effect, special pleading, moving goalposts and cherry pi Dave N. Apr 13, 2012 12:11 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hi Andi, As a human behavior specialist, you know the easiest way is just to press delete button without reading the email. But deep inside I feel you want to put your 2 cents worth Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 11:53 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hello Science Buffs, I wonder if it would be a good idea to continue this discussion on the Bu user 9. Apr 13, 2012 11:27 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Greetings all, I also want to mention that I have been traveling for the past 5 weeks and have been in Cambodia and currently in Vietnam. I have learned a lot about their history and especially touched by the genocide that occured in Cambodia by the Paula Apr 13, 2012 11:11 AM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - I think some people have latched onto the word and thrown a monique Apr 13, 2012 11:00 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Just to add Wayne, of cause there is nothing mysterious, I believe everything is simple, we just have to be free to ask questions. Sometime the questions are "stupid" out of orthodox established thinking but Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 10:40 AM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available monique Apr 13, 2012 10:34 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - There is an additional discussion where they go deeper into Tesla work of harnessing a static electricity from the air, including what I was not aware a huge storage electrical layer around the earth. Tesla Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 10:29 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Hi all..Consider this.. http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_­gates.html Sent from my iPad On[masked], at Betty Apr 13, 2012 10:25 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hi David, Let's just take two things from your email for now - homeopathy and therapeutic touch - you consider it pseudo-science. Am I right? Before I go deeper with scie Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 10:15 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hi Paula, Sorry to disagree. I see too many egos fighting not on merit but on win at every cost. Sorry the opposite side to mine except personal attacks, belittling, few of the shelf Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 9:57 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - It seems like it's not just an issue of asking what science is but also what is skepticism and what does it mean to be a skeptic? I think there should be a meetup so a live debate can occur and we can learn each others POV better. P Paula Apr 13, 2012 9:35 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Thanks Stan, After I sent the last email I saw that you had already provided a link for the TED talk in your next email. So I watched it, and I'm not sure why you refer to it as "Free Energy" as it Wayne M. Apr 13, 2012 9:33 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Dave N. Apr 13, 2012 9:23 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Hi Wayne http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/­en/eric_giler_demos_wireless_e­lectricity.html Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 9:17 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Hi Stan, Trying to keep an open mind, I looked for the TED talk on "free energy" that you mentioned but can't find one.  Could you please be more specific.  I'd like to watch it and make up my own mind. Wayne M. Apr 13, 2012 9:11 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 13, 2012 7:45 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 13, 2012 7:34 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Dear Monique I misspelled word - worlds should be words. Sorry it's 2.30 am. Sent from my iPad On[masked], at 2:24 AM, Stan Racansky < Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 2:37 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Dear Monique, Interesting explanation, almost Talmudic of lord Kelvin statements covering flight. This what I found on Wikipedia supported by outside historical documents. Stan R. Apr 13, 2012 2:24 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - You are awesome. Dave On[masked], at 10:57 PM, monique < [address removed] > wrote: Dave N. Apr 12, 2012 11:44 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available monique Apr 12, 2012 10:57 PM
Re: Free Thought RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 12, 2012 10:20 PM
RE: Free Thought RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hugh G. Apr 12, 2012 10:03 PM
Re: Free Thought RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 12, 2012 9:49 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 12, 2012 9:43 PM
Re: Free Thought RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hugh, I read little bit of Sheldon Cooper in the last paragraph. Stan Sent from my iPad On[masked], at 9:11 PM, Hugh < hugh@ph Stan R. Apr 12, 2012 9:28 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 12, 2012 9:12 PM
RE: Free Thought RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hugh G. Apr 12, 2012 9:11 PM
Re: Free Thought RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 12, 2012 8:49 PM
You sort of said it, Hugh.. - Betty Apr 12, 2012 8:25 PM
RE: Free Thought RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Chandiran H. Apr 12, 2012 8:22 PM
RE: Free Thought RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hugh G. Apr 12, 2012 8:09 PM
Re: Re: Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - " libertarian, tea party political agenda with thinly disguised pseudo-science masquerading as serious fact with an added false humanistic bent. Pure, intellectual Hari K. Apr 12, 2012 7:58 PM
Re: Free Thought RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 12, 2012 7:53 PM
North York Free Thought RE: Free Thought [physicsnorthyork] - Hugh G. Apr 12, 2012 6:27 PM
Re: Re: Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Hello Steve, Very definite words what did you based on? A tea party? Most of them do not know how to read, elitist propaganda, the program attacks elitists, Stan R. Apr 12, 2012 6:01 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Thank you Stan, I appreciate that. Anna Anna H. Apr 12, 2012 5:54 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hello Ann, Who said people interested in physics were just nerds, we are also "bloodthirsty" no enemy taken alive warriors. Welcome to the group. Stan Stan R. Apr 12, 2012 5:15 PM
Re: Re: Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - I should also mention that the real purpose of this film is to promote a  libertarian, tea party political agenda with thinly disguised pseudo-science masquerading as serious fact with an added false humanistic bent. Pure, intellectually bankrupt, elitist Steven F. Apr 12, 2012 5:14 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hello Hugh, If I understand you right. You see conspiracy behind every tree. Didn't you start this conversation on anti conspiracy platform? Basically what I understand from your las Stan R. Apr 12, 2012 5:11 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Anna H. Apr 12, 2012 4:32 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hugh G. Apr 12, 2012 4:28 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - I just started looking at the Video and find the basis of t Chandiran H. Apr 12, 2012 4:19 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) -  David Apr 12, 2012 2:54 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available monique Apr 12, 2012 2:38 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available monique Apr 12, 2012 2:32 PM
Free Thought RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hugh G. Apr 12, 2012 2:30 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available George V. Apr 12, 2012 1:45 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 12, 2012 1:17 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Chandiran H. Apr 12, 2012 1:12 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - David, you are talking religious concepts. "my way is right, who cares about your ideas, they are wrong" . The beauty is that most of the science is wrong but we are learning. Can you imagine if we accepted Stan R. Apr 12, 2012 12:15 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - I just have to say that I think we idealize science just a touch too much. Yes I'm all for logic, rational thought, creative thought, skeptical thought and facts. Let's be honest and point out that many scientists require funding - usually by corporati Paula Apr 12, 2012 12:11 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hello Monique, Welcome to the physics quarrel, shame you are on opposite side, I need friends. I am sorry you did not see the video but I can tell you at least this. For most what wa Stan R. Apr 12, 2012 12:04 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available David Apr 12, 2012 12:02 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available monique Apr 12, 2012 11:09 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Preview not available Hari K. Apr 12, 2012 10:50 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] how about .Seth Lloyd on Quantum Life? - thanks for this betty. it is really interesting! :-) cheers, kristina On 11 April[masked]:28, Betty < [address removed] > wrote: kristina Apr 12, 2012 3:43 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hi Hugh, I have read the Wikipedia description of pseudoscience. Then most of the quantum mechanics, especially string theory falls into that category. I like a other description, an Stan R. Apr 12, 2012 12:59 AM
[physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not) - Hugh G. Apr 12, 2012 12:14 AM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] how about .Seth Lloyd on Quantum Life? - Thanks Hari, very well said. Shame I did not come with this articulate response but I am working on it. Stan Sent from my iPad On[masked], at 11:21 PM, Hari Kuma Stan R. Apr 11, 2012 11:45 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] how about .Seth Lloyd on Quantum Life? - Hugh G. Apr 11, 2012 11:30 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] how about .Seth Lloyd on Quantum Life? - Interesting discussion. Though, in all honesty I did not read the entire meandering conversation, just skimmed through quickly. I watched this 'Thrive' video too, soon after it was posted on youtube. Despite its slickness, I was not impressed Hari K. Apr 11, 2012 11:06 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] how about .Seth Lloyd on Quantum Life? - Hi Dave, Thanks for your email. I know the video tried to cover many areas. The donation section I missed but maybe because I watch it on iPad and it does not allow flush pop ups. (t Stan R. Apr 11, 2012 9:23 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Dude, inductance! Over the air, not from the air. On[masked], at 8:32 PM, Stan Racansky < [address removed] > wrote: Dave N. Apr 11, 2012 9:14 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] how about .Seth Lloyd on Quantum Life? - Stan, I'm sorry you feel my observation Dave N. Apr 11, 2012 8:46 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Hello Hugh, Why the personal attack? But let's go right to the point - Tesla did not understand? Just now, 100 years later we are starting to understand his genius and are Stan R. Apr 11, 2012 8:32 PM
RE: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Hugh G. Apr 11, 2012 7:54 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - I just want to add Ted.com connection http://www.ted.com/talks/eric_­giler_d Stan R. Apr 11, 2012 7:25 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Hello Steven, I am a big fun of Mr. Tesla, I believe he is bigger genius then Mr. Einstein, because of his applied science, not just theory ( I am a Jew by the way, probably I will b Stan R. Apr 11, 2012 7:09 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] how about .Seth Lloyd on Quantum Life? - Hello Dave and rest of the gang. Dave, please tell me where you see a "polished ignorance". I am sorry, but your answer ricks of arrogant ignorance. I have also watched the video, ma Stan R. Apr 11, 2012 6:44 PM
Re: [physicsnorthyork] Fwd: THRIVE -documentary film ( important )! - Hi guys, Interesting point of you (Hugh), just propaganda?, I did not finish watching the movie in full but I will comment at least portion of it. No question the documentary encompa Stan R. Apr 11, 2012 4:07 PM

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy