|Sent on:||Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:46 PM|
How about charging third party recruiters for job posts but not direct company posts. This should eliminate the muck.
Sr. Recruiter Spotfire & DataSynapse
632 Broadway-Floor 3A | New York | NY 10012
The question was whether not including a company name is appropriate for the list, not whether it is in the interest of a recruiter not to reveal the company name, as if that were sufficient reason to decide list policy. Here's a suggestion, which some data analysis might answer: if it is in the interest of a recruiter not to disclose the company name, nyhackr could be compensated by the recruiter for not disclosing it. Determine a workable fee schedule.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Paul J Meyer <[address removed]> wrote:
The requirement to list a company (final employer) often is not done when the job
is post by a recruiter (whoops, almost said headhunter). Are people opposed to
recruiters sending listings? Is there a volume concern?
While job posts are certainly appropriate, I suggest we adopt similar rules to the python group, including:
*Must include company name
It might also be helpful to pin guidelines to the messageboard.
On Oct 18,[masked]:51 AM, "Lori Golden" <[address removed]> wrote:
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Florian Lengyel ([address removed]) from New York Open Statistical Programming Meetup.
To learn more about Florian Lengyel, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages
| [address removed]
This email message originally included an attachment.