I don't think that viewers/ readers will overload a server. I also do not think that inspectors will overload a server. GIT is the best to use. I think I remember his environment being Linux but his viewers may have anything (Linux/Windows/Mac). Part of the server must be devoted to authentication for viewer/reader login access control. The presentation of documents must be either PDF or HTML.
The inspectors and developers must be able to control revisions and access for write privileges. GIT or Subversion is best for the in-house team with write access authorization.
An admin will have to run the boat and push the content from devel server functionality to viewer/read only presentation server functionality. To get to
the read only permission there must be a user authentication functionality.
Better to give all a requirements doc before you embark on getting their feedback on a solution.
From: OldManRiver <[address removed]>
To: [address removed]
Sent: Tuesday, May 8,[masked]:47 AM
Subject: Re: [opensource-62] notepad advise
If SVN is the problem Linux vs Win, Rapid SVN runs on both, no
problems, but GIT is superior and easier to use.
Nyle E. Davis
On 05/07/[masked]:03 PM, Jeff Burns wrote:
As I do my
Roseanne-Roseanneadanna impersonation - OHHHHHH. That's
Actually, an SVN server would work quite well for that. I'm
going to go with Keith on this one based on your last
requirement. It bumps the complexity up *some*, although it
actually simplifies it in a lot of ways. I know you don't
need the source control, but it would allow for offline edits
easy enough, then the inspector can check it in with their
userid, while the customer's userid had R/O access via the
webpage and a link. The link only works if you have access.
As a side benefit, the customer would know if there had been
any modifications to the inspection report, so you could
upsell that as a feature. :)
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:28 PM,
mowgli <[address removed]>
i meant inspectors
can do read/write but others (clients) just need
read access. i cant do both w/o using links. &
links is not secure. sorry for confusion.
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message
will be sent to everyone on this mailing
list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Jeff Burns ([address removed])
from Dallas Open
To learn more about Jeff Burns, visit his/her member
Set my mailing list to email me As
they are sent | In
one daily email | Don't
send me mailing list messages
Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New
York, New York[masked] | [address removed]
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by OldManRiver ([address removed]) from Dallas Open Source Saturday.
To learn more about OldManRiver, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages
Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]