Mailing List Archive

Subject Sender Date
Connecticut bill to allow school personnel to possess weapons on school grounds - Connecticut bill to allow school personnel to possess weapons on school grounds Please tell your state rep to vote YES on this bill. Here is the l Safety J. Jan 30, 2013 1:40 AM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - You must live in a city. Every man I know has urinated on a tree at least once in his life. I'm fairly Jim P. Jan 29, 2013 9:20 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - So if the Constitution Does not apply to private property or businesses than the business owner would still have the freedom to deny service to anyone they choose. On Jan 29, 2013, at 4 Duncan Kirk M. Jan 29, 2013 5:03 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - Nudity is the natural state of humanity. Saying you don't have a right to nudity on public property is like saying you don't have a right to breath on public property. Like Ron Paul says in regards to the drug war, "You Duncan Kirk M. Jan 29, 2013 4:57 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - The question on whether it's constitutional or not is irrelevant. The US Constitution is a binding document only on government e Michael G. Jan 29, 2013 4:55 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - On a persons private property they have the right to refuse entry/service to anyone they wish, wether they're naked or of a particular ethnic group. Modern discrimination laws are violating private property rights. Duncan Kirk M. Jan 29, 2013 4:47 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - Preview not available Gregory K. Jan 29, 2013 4:40 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - user 1. Jan 29, 2013 3:41 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - Where is it "totally Constitutional" for store owners to refuse entry/service to naked people?   Which Constitution are you referring to anyway - The United States Constitution or a State(ist) Constitution like Vermont? JM Jan 29, 2013 3:32 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - Lol. On private property it's totally Constitutional for store owners etc to refuse entry/service to naked people. On Jan 28, 2013, at 11:29 PM, Jim Palmer < Duncan Kirk M. Jan 29, 2013 2:36 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - Exactly! A landowner should be free to urinate and defecate on his own property. The right to choose Public Sanitation should belong to the individual person, not The State (or The Statists ). Public Sanitation JM Jan 29, 2013 2:23 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - These (appropriate enough) ordinances (prior restraint) are in regards to communal/property, not private property. Marc G. Jan 29, 2013 1:57 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - Exactly! Another example of The Statists © enforcing their rules through VIOLENCE! Will we ever have True and Full Liberty from the tyranny of The Statists JM Jan 29, 2013 1:38 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - More than a few Public Ordinances emphatically state "Thou Glenn Jan 29, 2013 1:12 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - speaking of BS,   where in the Constitution (I assume we're referring to the US Constitution) does it prohibit urinating and/or defecating in public? Suppose someone is homeless or doesn't have access to a toilet or even t JM Jan 29, 2013 12:55 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - P ublic n udity is not prohibited b Jim P. Jan 28, 2013 11:29 PM
As ‘Bodega Clinicas’ Fill Void, Officials Are Torn on Embracing Them - Preview not available JM Jan 28, 2013 6:06 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - I think laws requiring people to wear clothes at all qualify as unconstitutional. I don't see anywhere in the Constitution restricting nudity or forcing people to buy clothes. What if someo Duncan Kirk M. Jan 28, 2013 4:07 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - You would probably get less time if you walked around totally nude. Probably no time at all, maybe just a fine. Michael G. Jan 28, 2013 2:51 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - Welcome to the PIC: prison industrial complex. Its nothing Glenn Jan 28, 2013 12:11 PM
Connecticut Gun Owners Action Alert 1/28/13 - Please tell your state reps to vote NO on these bills. Here is the link to find your state rep email address http://www.cga.ct.gov/asp/menu­/CGAFindLe Safety J. Jan 28, 2013 12:13 AM
Population trends and control - Article says that the rate of global population increase is declining and at the current rate the total wor Jim P. Jan 27, 2013 10:26 PM
Re: Martin Luther King Jr. was right on. Here are a few things that he said - - Both quotes, Marc, describe the times perfectly... and great choices for your book! Robin B. Jan 27, 2013 1:34 PM
Possible 3-year jail sentence for wearing your pants too low - Wearing saggy pants in MA could result in a 3-year prison sentence: http://www.mediaite.com/online­/bizarre-psa-to-massachusetts-­youth-pull-up-your-pants-or-yo­u-could-go-to-prison/ Welcome to bizarro-world. Scott R Jan 25, 2013 11:23 PM
Bill Proposed In Oregon Would Make Cigarettes Prescription-only Drugs - http://libertycrier.com/govern­ment/bill-proposed-in-oregon-w­ould-make-cigarettes-prescript­ion-only-drugs/?utm_source=The­+Liberty+Crier&utm_campaign=97­02ed4cf4-The_Liberty_Crier_Dai­ly_News_1_25_2013&utm_medium=e­mail www.Why-Peace.com Marc G. Jan 25, 2013 10:50 PM
Fwd: Watch Free: Austrian Economics for High-School Students - JM Jan 25, 2013 12:04 PM
Fw: [Sheriff Richard Mack] By People Against the NDAA - The last fyi of the night (morning) barbara g. barbara g. Jan 24, 2013 1:39 AM
Fw: Alert: CT Gun Bills & Legislator Contacts - Fyi..if you know Toni, give her a call or 3. Pass this to all ypur contacts in CT. barbara g. barbara g. Jan 24, 2013 1:35 AM
Fw: A Newtown Patriot Speaks Out - Amen!! Thanx for sharing Bob. barbara g. barbara g. Jan 24, 2013 12:44 AM
Connecticut Gun Owners Action Alert 1/23/13 - Please tell your state senator to vote NO on these bills today. Here is the link to find your senator's email address http://www.cga.ct.gov/asp/menu­/CGAF Safety J. Jan 23, 2013 2:55 AM
Quote - “Think of how much poorer we are as a society and in terms of good inventions, and new companies, and so forth.&nbs Marc G. Jan 21, 2013 6:54 PM
Martin Luther King Jr. was right on. Here are a few things that he said - - Martin Luther King Jr. was right on. Here are a few things that he said - Marc G. Jan 21, 2013 9:16 AM
A good read - user 1. Jan 17, 2013 9:19 PM
RE: [lpct-opinions] For any interested in discussing - user 1. Jan 17, 2013 3:47 PM
Discounted tickets for Tom Woods at Liberty Forum - If you plan on atttending the Liberty Forum next month and haven't yet purchased your tickets use discount code: "2013NHLF". It's good for 10% off Full and 3 day speeches pass. Purchase your tickets here: https://freestateproject.org/r­egistration/libertyf shemdogg Jan 17, 2013 12:45 PM
Barnes & Noble: 15% coupon and a Café Treat - JM Jan 17, 2013 10:31 AM
RE: [lpct-opinions] For any interested in discussing - user 1. Jan 17, 2013 10:08 AM
RE: [lpct-opinions] For any interested in discussing - user 1. Jan 17, 2013 9:51 AM
RE: RE: RE: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [lpct-activists] Feedback on chart - user 1. Jan 17, 2013 9:45 AM
RE: [lpct-opinions] For any interested in discussing - user 1. Jan 17, 2013 9:41 AM
RE: [lpct-opinions] For any interested in discussing - Preview not available Gregory K. Jan 16, 2013 10:47 PM
gun rights march at the capital this saturday - just spreading the word... Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T danarchy Jan 16, 2013 10:13 PM
Re: RE: RE: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [lpct-activists] Feedback on chart - New Milford? Ouch, I'm in Clinton, sorry Gary but that's a hike for me, perhaps if there's one scheduled closer to my area, I can attend. Good luck w/ that first one coming up! Robin B. Jan 16, 2013 8:28 PM
For any interested in discussing - user 1. Jan 16, 2013 7:47 PM
Suzanna Hupp - Why We Need Guns - Hear Her Congressional Testimony! - Check out Suzanna Hupp, and the Luby's Massacre, which she survived in Killeen, Texas in 1991. Suzanna owned a gun, and normally Jim A. Jan 16, 2013 11:21 AM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - as long as their not violating anyone else's rights On Jan 15, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Glenn < [address removed] > wrote: Duncan Kirk M. Jan 15, 2013 10:36 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - Well said. When you accept freedom you must accept the decisions of others as well. On Jan 15, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Glenn < Duncan Kirk M. Jan 15, 2013 10:35 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - Preview not available Glenn Jan 15, 2013 10:26 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Fw: Howard Stern talks about Alex Jones - funny - Alex is in their face like no other talk show host. He hits both sides of the paradigm without restraint. Time for the real Constitutionalist to stand up. Vote out the Progressive agenda politicians and the fake Republic Luis C. Jan 15, 2013 3:31 PM
It's About Human Rights - Not Guns - user 1. Jan 15, 2013 10:18 AM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Fw: Howard Stern talks about Alex Jones - funny - Loved it! On Jan 15, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Jim Azzola < [address removed] > wrote: Duncan Kirk M. Jan 15, 2013 10:14 AM
Fw: Howard Stern talks about Alex Jones - funny - Thanks Curley, Jim A. Jan 15, 2013 9:53 AM
Devvy Kidd's Take No Prisoners Approach on the 2nd Amendment! - http://newswithviews.com/Devvy­/kidd569.htm Devvy makes mention of CT Citizens Defense League, Edwin Vieira, and more.&nbs Jim A. Jan 14, 2013 11:25 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - Preview not available JM Jan 14, 2013 7:04 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - the interview Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T JM wrote: >Dan, when you say "what a joke", what are you referring to? - the interview >or Libertarianism? > >I thought Brennan was a closet *Statist*. Here’s some exce danarchy Jan 14, 2013 5:49 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - user 1. Jan 14, 2013 4:54 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - Ok Dan, thanks for your input. -----Original Message----- From: [address removed] [mailto:[address removed]] On Behalf Of danarchy Sent: Monday, January 14,[masked]:42 PM To: [address removed] Subject: RE: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's user 1. Jan 14, 2013 4:47 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - Preview not available JM Jan 14, 2013 3:20 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - By socialized services, what I mean is each individual contracts out to some entity to handle needed goods and/or services.  Jim A. Jan 14, 2013 2:27 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - socialized services should never be done by government, of course the local level is usually the least corrupted, but it is still morally wrong because youre using government to force people to do or to pay for things they may or may not want. Sent from danarchy Jan 14, 2013 1:02 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - honestly, i really dont think there is a way, its too far gone and cant be undone, most people either dont care or think the government should be bigger, not smaller. we're on the losing side of this, no matter how many books we write, presentations we gi danarchy Jan 14, 2013 12:42 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - user 1. Jan 14, 2013 9:40 AM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [lpct-activists] Feedback on chart - user 1. Jan 14, 2013 9:32 AM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Re: Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - user 1. Jan 14, 2013 9:14 AM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - user 1. Jan 14, 2013 9:06 AM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - There will always be the motivation to leech off on others. This is especially important for the would-be political class Jim A. Jan 14, 2013 9:06 AM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [lpct-activists] Feedback on chart - Would have to know more about what you are trying to accomplish To anyone who knows their history I would remind them that shemdogg Jan 13, 2013 10:31 PM
Re: Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - Gary, Jim A. Jan 13, 2013 10:25 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - A s I said, all aspect s of l Jim P. Jan 13, 2013 9:59 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [lpct-activists] Feedback on chart - user 1. Jan 13, 2013 9:58 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - user 1. Jan 13, 2013 9:56 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - Preview not available danarchy Jan 13, 2013 8:30 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - user 1. Jan 13, 2013 3:27 AM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - That is a great lecture. This one is too - http://youtube.com/watch?v=BRh­tmcxDSIs Marc G. Jan 12, 2013 11:34 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - Others know much more of h istory than I. I pick up bits and piece Jim P. Jan 12, 2013 11:29 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - user 1. Jan 12, 2013 11:48 AM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - user 1. Jan 12, 2013 10:59 AM
C-SPAN's Q&A: "Libertarianism: What Everyone Need to Know" - Preview not available JM Jan 12, 2013 9:49 AM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - I was at t he SCC meeting w hen Robert was interviewed and appro Jim P. Jan 11, 2013 9:44 PM
Statist Crashes "Chalk the Police Day" in Keene, New Hampshire - Preview not available JM Jan 11, 2013 4:13 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] new ct gun ban bill - Not MY words, mind you: "State Senator Ed Meyer is a Glenn Jan 11, 2013 12:38 PM
new ct gun ban bill - theyre planning on banning every firearm and magazine that can carry and fire more than one bullet. http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/TOB­/S/2013SB-00122-R00-SB.htm Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY   Introduced by:   SEN. MEYER, 12th Dist.   AN ACT CON danarchy Jan 11, 2013 12:21 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [lpct-activists] Feedback on chart - Dunno but will find out at meeting next wk On Jan 10, 2013, at 8:23 PM, Gary Barnes < [address removed] shemdogg Jan 11, 2013 10:22 AM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - user 1. Jan 11, 2013 10:08 AM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - What is your working solution to the problem of government? You never answered the question. -----Original Message----- From: [address removed] [mailto:[address removed]] On Behalf Of danarchy Sent: Friday, January 11,[masked]:23 AM To user 1. Jan 11, 2013 9:35 AM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - everytging you just said is retarded beyond explanation. and yes, if you would support the government using force against people that have not used force against anyone else than you are a statist, that is certainly not a libertarian position. the idea danarchy Jan 11, 2013 12:22 AM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - Proud to be a non-libertarian statist! Hope no one uncovers that my runs for office as a Robert Jan 11, 2013 12:02 AM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - I cant think of a single time that Ron Paul ever voted for a bill or supported a law that gave the government authority to initiate the use of force against the individual, rather the opposite actually, the whole point of his campaign was to get rid of th danarchy Jan 10, 2013 10:35 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - I'm confused as well. Again I'm not the best at wording a response. So why is Ron Paul a Libertarian? Wasn't he working with the statists while trying to "lessen" government's involvement in people's lives? (not trying to get rid of it.) He has been user 1. Jan 10, 2013 10:07 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [ronpaul-295] Alex Jones Comes Out Swinging in Piers Morgan Gun Interview - Jones' editor worked at CIA front Stratfor... It was on her linked in profile... When confronted she didn't even deny and changed her profile. I still think AJ is mostly telling the truth but is still guarding something... Sent from my iPhone On Aaron Jan 10, 2013 9:52 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [ronpaul-295] Alex Jones Comes Out Swinging in Piers Morgan Gun Interview - i disagree. anybody that wants to use government force and violence against individuals for statutory victimless nonviolent crimes is no friend of liberty and no ally of the liberty movement. thats entirely what we're supposed to be fighting against. Se danarchy Jan 10, 2013 9:31 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - Gary, i'm just confused on your interpretation of Libertarianism. Libertarianism or Minarchism as i know it is based solely on the Non-Aggression Principle and property rights. These are the two core fundamental principles of the philosophy. This is what danarchy Jan 10, 2013 9:29 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [ronpaul-295] Alex Jones Comes Out Swinging in Piers Morgan Gun Interview - Anyone who wants less governme nt is a friend of liberty. Some are better friends than others, b Jim P. Jan 10, 2013 8:59 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - user 1. Jan 10, 2013 8:57 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - The anarchist wing of the Libertarian Party is maybe Jim P. Jan 10, 2013 8:33 PM
RE: RE: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [lpct-activists] Feedback on chart - user 1. Jan 10, 2013 8:23 PM
RE: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - This thread has broken into several ones so I'll try to connect with all. Thank you all for your observations. I had no intent to accuse anyone of anything. I'm just trying to figure out the current Libertarian stance. My observations based on the wi user 1. Jan 10, 2013 7:46 PM
Re: RE: [ronpaul-1358] Re: [lpct-activists] Feedback on chart - Geesh, all this bickering over Gary's request for a little feedback... I applaud his efforts, if scheduling permits I will even attend his workshop/seminar. I l Robin B. Jan 10, 2013 4:11 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests? - wow, that statement is absurd. free market theory is based on property rights and voluntarism, thats why libertarians believe it is the only moral society. As Ron Paul, Murray Rothbard, Tom Woods, and countless other libertarian political philosophers ha danarchy Jan 10, 2013 4:07 PM
Re: [ronpaul-1358] Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To - Hi. I'm sorry, but I haven't made the time to read the original article nor very many of the responses. I would li Marc G. Jan 10, 2013 3:16 PM

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy