Ron Paul for President 2012 San Diego County Message Board › More States Demand Proof of Obamas' Eligibility

More States Demand Proof of Obamas' Eligibility

john_08152002
john_08152002
San Diego, CA
Post #: 443
Despite the decision in Georgia to appeal a judges verdict other states are taking initial steps to formally review the evidence of Mr. Obamas' birth records. Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio will release his official cold case police investigation of the Presidents' birth records soon. It is quite possible that a minority of states could remove the President from their November ballots.


More Challenges to Obama Eligibility
February 23, 2012 by Giacomo Godfatherpolitics.com


It seems that more and more people and groups are spurring their states to take a closer look at Barack Obama’s eligibility to run for President of the United States.

You’ve read about Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County investigation into Obama’s eligibility and whether or not he will appear on the ballot for 2.5 million voters. In response, Obama got the DOJ to attack Arpaio in an effort to discredit him and remove him from office before he could announce the findings of the investigation.

Georgia also has challenged his eligibility and one judge has ruled that he is eligible. However, there is a question of the judge’s impartiality and the case has been appealed to a higher court.

Mississippi also has a case pending in the courts on Obama’s eligibility in that state.

It now appears that the state of Indiana is about to launch hearings on Obama’s eligibility and boy are they strict on eligibility.


Indiana Secretary of State Charlie White was recently removed from office because of his failure to update his voter registration card. Among the issues with White is the fact that he registered to vote at his former wife’s home which in fact was not his own residence. A jury convicted him of voter fraud in the case. In an effort to determine if in fact White is eligible or not to hold the office to which he was elected to in 2010, a hearing with the elections committee is scheduled for Feb 29. Last year the elections committee actually ruled in White’s favor, but a judge later ruled against him.

It has now been reported that the Indiana elections board will be conducting a hearing on Obama’s eligibility. The preliminary meeting is to be held tomorrow the 24th. One of those involved in the hearing is California attorney Orly Taitz, who has been involved in other cases concerning Obama’s eligibility.

I don’t know if Taitz or the others intend to pursue the issue of whether or not Obama is a natural born citizen. If they do, I trust they will use the following US Supreme Court rulings:

Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)

“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”

Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)

“If she was, then her birth and residence might be deemed to constitute her by election a citizen of South Carolina. If she was not of age, then she might well be deemed under the circumstances of this case to hold the citizenship of her father, for children born in a country, continuing while under age in the family of the father, partake of his national character as a citizen of that country.”

Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)

“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents.”

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

“At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

Read more: More Challenges to Obama Eligibility - Godfather Politics http://godfatherpolit...­
A former member
Post #: 9
We need activist volunteers on our other meetup site. www.meetup.com/sandiegoronpaul

We are trying to get people who are interested in going around for Ron Paul
Powered by mvnForum

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy