addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupsimageimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1outlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruseryahoo

RE: [lpsf] Mayoral forum at Castro Theater TONIGHT - 7-930pm

From: user 2.
Sent on: Tuesday, August 9, 2011 7:47 AM
Great report Starchild....thx

-----Original Message-----
From: [address removed] [mailto:[address removed]] On Behalf Of Starchild
Sent: Tuesday, August 09,[masked]:31 AM
To: [address removed]
Subject: Re: [lpsf] Mayoral forum at Castro Theater TONIGHT - 7-930pm

Hey Jeremie,

	Did you end up going? Sorry I don't really do texts, and didn't read  
your message.

	It was an interesting event. I was pretty amazed that they managed to  
pack the Castro Theater with virtually a full house, probably at least  
several hundred people. There were some fireworks too, as uninvited  
Green Party candidate Terry Baum showed up and sat in an extra chair  
on stage, refusing to leave unless they arrested her (good for her!)  
They let her stay, and she got to answer a couple questions when other  
candidates ceded some time to her. At one point she ripped into Dennis  
Herrera for refusing as city attorney to allow over 200 votes for her  
as a write-in candidate against Nancy Pelosi to be counted, because  
those voters had written in her name but hadn't connected the arrow on  
the ballot. She's right, that was an incredibly anti-democratic  
decision that flew in the face of common sense.

	Also making an apparently unscheduled appearance as one of the  
candidates on stage (he hadn't been listed on the flier for the event)  
was interim mayor Ed Lee. Lee predictably took potshots from a number  
of the other candidates for breaking his promise not to run for a full  
term as mayor. Of the candidates who went after him, Leland Yee was  
the most confrontational, attacking the independent expenditure  
committee that's mounted the "Run, Ed, Run" campaign in support of Lee  
in strong terms and saying it must be "shut down immediately". Tony  
Hall said he welcomed Lee into the race, but made it a rather  
backhanded approval by adding that he hadn't been surprised by Lee's  
about-face, because he'd believed it was a set-up from the beginning.  
David Chiu, one of the more wishy-washy candidates, imho, settled for  
more vaguely anti-Lee comments like "it's about independence" and that  
the successes he says they'd had at City Hall during the current term  
were "based on fundamental trust".

	The jabs from other candidates were expected, but what surprised me  
is that Lee drew sustained boos from a fairly large number of people  
in the audience the first couple times he tried to speak, and  
intermittently after that. Although I wasn't among those booing, I was  
encouraged by this sign that many San Franciscans, despite what they  
put up with from the political class, still *do* think blatantly  
breaking a key promise is a big deal. I also saw a couple people  
sporting "Lie, Ed, Lie" buttons. Gotta get one of those!  :-)

	Several of the candidates blatantly pandered to the presumed gay- 
heavy Castro neighborhood audience. John Avalos claimed he'd just been  
tweeted by someone who'd told him he'd be a great gay mayor (he is  
straight). He also noted the movie theater venue with a quote from  
Lord of the Rings, about how when you're wearing a ring of power,  
you're alone (they'd been asked a terrific question that almost all of  
them ducked, namely when they had taken unpopular stands). During the  
applause for Avalos after his response, I yelled that he should throw  
the ring of power into the volcano.  :-)  It was a pretty spirited  
crowd, so I didn't feel too self-conscious doing it.

	Phil Ting was rather disappointing. I wasn't that familiar with him  
and thought he might be advocating a fairly fiscally conservative  
message, but he made a couple really bad comments in that area,  
including boasting that "I'm one of the few elected officials in  
California who has championed Prop. 13 reform" (read: raising property  
taxes), and claiming that the number one problem with education is  
that "We're not spending any money on schools". You can't make this  
stuff up.

	Right now the candidates I'm most interested in supporting are Terry  
Baum, Tony Hall, or Joana Rees. Rees is still a pretty unknown  
quantity to me. She had a few good-sounding things to say at the  
forum, but was troublingly short on specifics or much of an  
identifiable ideology. Except for the fact that she *hasn't* been in  
politics, she sounded a lot like a career politician hewing to the  
middle. Hall is the most fiscally conservative, but although he can be  
refreshingly frank about many things, like alleging corruption and  
insider cronyism at City Hall, he's rather too much the politician for  
me to be comfortable with him. For instance, he says he's not  
supporting Jeff Adachi's pension reform measure because it doesn't  
include health care, which sounds to me like a very weak excuse to  
avoid taking a stance he thinks will be unpopular. He told the  
audience he wasn't supporting either pension measure, but didn't  
explain publicly what he told me in person, that he didn't think  
Adachi's measure did *enough* to rein in costs (when I asked him if  
his lack of support was because he thought it did too much or too  
little. This is also a former Supervisor who voted to raise his own  
pay. Terry is probably the most liberal candidate; I think she'd be  
excellent on civil liberties, but worry about what she'd do on the  
fiscal side. She was wearing a button saying "Tax the rich". Still,  
the fact that she's such an outsider and would probably shake up the  
status quo more than any of the others makes it tempting to support  
her. If any of this crop would be likely as mayor to, say, stand up to  
federal bullying on marijuana, immigration, war on terror stuff, etc.,  
it would be Terry.

	I may post some more notes later, but more likely on [address removed] 
. A problem with posting to Meetup is that they don't allow you to  
address a message to multiple lists, which means if I want to send  
something to three Meetup lists, I'd have to send three different  
messages. Consequently I tend to post more on Yahoo. I encourage  
everyone to lobby Meetup to drop this rule, and also the daily posting- 
limit rule, by emailing [address removed]. They say these are anti- 
spam measures, but I think a better approach would be for them to more  
aggressively go after spammers.

Love & Liberty,
                                ((( starchild )))


On Aug 8, 2011, at 6:22 PM, jeremier wrote:

> Sent a text message, in case you want to meet after (may not be able  
> to make   7)
>
> J
>
> On Aug 8, 2011, at 5:18 PM, Starchild <[address removed]> wrote:
>
>>   The flier lists candidates Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Chiu, Dufty,  
>> Hall, Herrera, Rees, Ting, and Yee, is sponsored by several  
>> different groups, and has a moderator from KPIX. Should be a pretty  
>> big forum, I'll probably check it out. Anybody else want to go? If  
>> so and you'd like to meet up, give me a call at (415) 625-FREE, as  
>> I may not see an email in time.
>>
>> Love & Liberty,
>>                                 ((( starchild )))
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to  
>> everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
>> http://www.meetup...­
>> This message was sent by Starchild ([address removed]) from  
>> The San Francisco Libertarian Party Meetup Group.
>> To learn more about Starchild, visit his/her member profile: http://www.meetup...­
>> To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here: http://www.meetup...­
>> Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to  
> everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
> http://www.meetup...­
> This message was sent by jeremier ([address removed]) from  
> The San Francisco Libertarian Party Meetup Group.
> To learn more about jeremier, visit his/her member profile: http://www.meetup...­
> To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here: http://www.meetup...­
> Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]
>




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
http://www.meetup...­
This message was sent by Starchild ([address removed]) from The San Francisco Libertarian Party Meetup Group.
To learn more about Starchild, visit his/her member profile: http://www.meetup...­
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here: http://www.meetup...­
Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy