|Sent on:||Sunday, November 20, 2011 5:54 PM|
Maybe just a good moderator.
I don't like the idea of the "talking stick" because a person who builds their argument off of a flawed premise, or uses incorrect "facts" will just waste everyone's time. Or if they aren't clear.
I think we should be allowed/encouraged to quickly interrupt to ask for clarity, for example.
Just my two cents.
I noticed that Sabrina commented that she had a problem at the last meeting expressing her ideas because she was continualy being interrupted. I too, had that same problem to a small extent at the discussion that I attended with the group a while back. I like the idea of passing a "talking stick" or something similar. That way the person can express his/her thoughts (for a reasonable time) and then pass to the next person. Any thoughts?Regards,Deeanna
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Deeanna ([address removed]) from The Houston Philosophy Meetup Group.
To learn more about Deeanna, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here
Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]