addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Re: [NYJavaSIG] Google vs Oracle - jury resolution

From: Eric P.
Sent on: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:16 AM
I wonder if this will change Oracle's support of Java.   If they bought Sun primarily for the ability to sue Google and now...

-- Eric



On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Frank Greco <[address removed]> wrote:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/05/google-v-oracle-no-patent-infringement-found/

 

Interesting that the jurors only found a minor infraction by Google.  So Android seems free and clear (caveat:  I'm not a lawyer nor do I play one on iptv...)

 

See everyone tonight for Ben's JSR 107 Caching update and Victor's very cool concurrency animation.

Frank G





--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Frank Greco ([address removed]) from JavaSIG.
To learn more about Frank Greco, visit his/her member profile


Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy