addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcredit-cardcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobe--smallglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1launch-new-window--smalllight-bulblinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Re: [questioningrel-83] Thoughts on "Recent thoughts from Doug"

From: Anna
Sent on: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:39 PM
Re: proofs of Noah's ark

I find this line of reasoning problematic. While there is a
possibility that Noah's ark would be able to contain all the animals
due to an act of divine will, we have no way of knowing that this was
actually the case. The only thing telling us this is so is the Bible.

The Bible is either:

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:21 PM, James Paster Jr. <[address removed]> wrote:
> Doug,
> One thing to think about in regards to science not being able to prove
> Noah's ark. Let us say for sake of argument that the God I believe in is
> Creator. Would He not be able to make the animals calm so they would not
> kill each other? If He is truly all powerful and created the universe this
> would be?child's?play for Him since as Creator He ordered all laws of
> science into existence not too mention that He would not have to adhere to
> them. Here is an interesting question. How do people with terminal cancer
> become completely free of the disease over night(which has been documented
> medically and scientifically)?
> One other thing I would say is that one cannot become a Christian and then
> not be one anymore according to God's word. You either are or are not. This
> is a commonly mistaken belief of many who have never truly experienced God's
> grace and mercy in their lives.
> As for my belief in an all sovereign God, it is a very uncomfortable place
> to be in yet at the same time comforting. I will need to explain this to you
> face to face since there will be many questions about this concept.
> Thank you Doug for being so kind to me in all that you have communicated. I
> can only hope to be as kind in return.
> Soli Deo Gloria,
> Jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas Scheesley <[address removed]>
> To: [address removed]
> Sent: Wed, Apr 14,[masked]:26 pm
> Subject: Re: [questioningrel-83] Thoughts on "Recent thoughts from Doug"
> James,
> Do not worry, no offense was taken at all.? Believe me, I have gone from
> hardcore atheist to Christian to pagan... to a lot of different beliefs, and
> the only thing that I really know is that I am not a big fan of organized
> religion, in the sense that a hierarchy must exist.
> As for some of your quotes:
> "It is my quest to learn what the agnostic system of belief offers those who
> hold to this view point, especially since after examining myself during this
> time I found nothing of value in it for myself."
> Well, being agnostic really is not a religious belief... I would consider it
> more a school of thought first, though I am sure many consider it a
> religious position if you simply believe in a creator, but you can be
> agnostic w/o believing in a creator.? To me, agnosticism is a transitional
> state.? Please excuse the chemistry talk.? Transitional states, in
> chemistry, are structures in between reactions.? So if you have a reaction
> from starting material A to form product B, the transition state may look
> more like A or B (A* or B*, respectively).? These transitions states are not
> stable, they bounce back from form to form, and are usually difficult to
> characterize.? That is really the only way I can describe my beliefs at
> times.
> As for what value can be found by having a religious agnostic view?? For me
> (and I am sure Mario will agree with this theme), I prefer the freedom I
> have to believe what I wish.? The minute I call myself Christian (not that I
> am), everyone immediately thinks they know what I believe, no different then
> when I tell people I am a Republican... they automatically have a tendency
> to assume that I think George Bush was the greatest President and that I get
> off on torture (pardon my language, but a little pain never hurt anybody ;-)
> I kid, I kid).? Anywho...
> I would say believing in a more formless creator has some great benefits.
> One is that no one else can tell you what it is.? You have no established
> doctrine, so there are no arguments.? If I want to believe that Anubis is
> the male form of the creator, and Jean D'Arc is the female form of the
> creator, no agnostic person can say "you are wrong".? Also, it allows me to
> take what parts I agree with from any religion.? Because the Bible is the
> major account of who God and Jesus are, I really do not care for them (I
> find both divine beings, in the Bibles account, to be hypocritical).? I can
> still believe that a sort of heaven and hell exist, but I do not have to
> believe that the god that is talked about in the Bible has anything to do
> with that.? I do not have to believe in Noahs ark as being historical fact
> (something I cannot accept).? It allows me to be able to believe in
> something, without having to get into a debate with an atheist about
> ridiculous things such as how you could build such an ark where the animals
> wouldn't kill each other and disease run rampant.? I can believe, without
> scientific arguments being able to truely argue the validity, because
> scientific validity is still important to me.? I can believe that Anubis is
> God, and not a single person can scientifically prove me wrong.? True, you
> can believe in the ark, but science has a basis to argue why it could not
> have happened.
> To me, being agnostic gives you the flexibility to believe in a creative
> force without being in conflict with ones scientific beliefs.? In
> Christianity, I believe that is a little more difficult, especially when one
> believes the Bible to be the word of God (which I do not).
> Please, do not take offense from my criticisms of a religion.? It is
> important for you (and everyone) to know that as much as I believe in what I
> do, I also believe that others have the right to believe what they want, and
> I encourage that.? In fact, I find myself defending many of my Christian
> friends, because I do think Christianity has gotten a bum wrap for certain
> reasons.
> But I will also enforce, even though I may respect someones beliefs, it does
> not mean I agree with them, as I usually do not, but I will accept them as
> beliefs.
> And so you know, I have read the Old Testament some time ago, and took a
> course in college on Biblical Narrative, because I believe it is important
> for me to understand others beliefs.
> Regards,
> Douglas Scheesley
> --
> Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on
> this mailing list ([address removed])
> This message was sent by Douglas Scheesley ([address removed]) from
> Agnostics Anonymous Phoenixville.
> To learn more about Douglas Scheesley, visit his/her member profile
> To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here
> Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] |
> [address removed]
> --
> Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on
> this mailing list ([address removed])
> This message was sent by James Paster Jr. ([address removed]) from Agnostics
> Anonymous Phoenixville.
> To learn more about James Paster Jr., visit his/her member profile
> To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here
> Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] |
> [address removed]

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy