addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Republicans and Democrats converge

We are a politically diverse group. Which is something our nation shares with us. However, our politicians cannot seem to negotiate with each other in their politics. But can a group of freethinkers possibly sort out this mess of differences between Republicans and Democrats without hitting the same brick wall our government representatives have hit.

I will do my best to mediate this discussion. I am a Democratic liberal so I know I may be accused of being biased. But I do find myself on the conservative side on some issues. So I will do my best to follow the ideals written out on this website.

http://www.diffen.com/difference/Democrat_vs_Republican

I am certain that there will be some that will disagree with some of the points on this website. However, I find them very close to the truth on both sides. We will take them issue by issue and make an attempt to understand each others point of view. 

This may require more than one meet up. I am willing to go as long as it takes to sort this mess out. And hopefully we can get as close as possible to an equal amount of party people as possible. 

Hope to see you there, Sam

Join or login to comment.

  • Suzy W.

    Curious why "Joe" who attended this Meetup and had many comments, did not sign up here. Are you reading this, Joe?

    1 · February 25, 2014

  • Karen

    3 or 4 sentences might be too limiting. I liked when people with something to contribute were allowed to express their ideas and share info. A "talking stick"?

    1 · February 24, 2014

    • Mark T.

      Maybe time limit instead of sentence limit. I think we have a one-minute hourglass that came with some game.

      February 24, 2014

    • Karen

      Yes, fun and mind-expanding! Can't we just be a self-governing group as we seemed to be last time? As soon as you begin imposing rules....well, you have a "government"!!­!

      February 25, 2014

  • Maude

    I'm at a disadvantage because I missed this, due to sitting in a parking lot on Brookpark Road with dead windshield wipers. However, Cleveland Salon gatherings have a system that may be useful. Say you divide the time up according to maybe, three topics decided upon ahead of time as Suzy suggests. For each topic, Sam, or the person suggesting the topic can give a 1 minute intro, and then calls on the whomever has their hand raised to contribute. Each speaker in turn, yields to the next by calling on someone else. The rule is that when finished speaking, one looks for someone who has not yet spoken first, or has had few comments so far, and only calls on someone who has spoken a lot already if the others aren't raising their hand.

    No one interrupts the person who has the floor, and to question or comment to someone who has spoken, you need to raise your hand and wait for a speaker to yield to you.

    February 24, 2014

  • Suzy W.

    Remarkable that the conversation/discussion was respectable and well attended! For myself, I continue to learn from fellow freethinkers, as many have had diverse experiences and also have desired to read what I have not. It is difficult to not come out of such a discussion feeling a bit depressed regarding our future in the USA. However, the good thing is seeing a room full of people with different ideas all consciously trying to work together which will be a big plus in any crisis we might have to deal with down the road. A big thank you to Sam for putting on this meetup and I hope there will be more with this topic!

    3 · February 23, 2014

    • Suzy W.

      Maybe ask for topic suggestions beforehand to be discussed in order. (then compile a short list of topics) Ask that if someone suggests a topic, then they must commit to attending the Meetup, and even possibly presenting the suggested topic to the group.

      February 24, 2014

    • Alida t.

      thanks Sam good gathering, would be nice as Karen and suzy suggested and that it be more conversational with responses limited to 3 or 4 sentences so that everyone can be involved

      February 24, 2014

  • Mark T.

    My gig ran late (predictably) but I'm glad I caught up with some of you at Applebee's. I look forward to the next Meetup of this type!

    1 · February 23, 2014

  • Suzy W.

    I suggest those who missed this meetup make sure and attend the next one, as it was quite the positive experience seeing fellow Freethinkers attempt this difficult subject matter. You will be impressed.

    2 · February 23, 2014

  • Karen

    This was one of my favorite meetings, and I consider myself "apolitical". This was a very informed, thoughtful, and considerate group. I very much enjoyed hearing all the different viewpoints. As I watched as everyone agreed to disagree, it struck me that this type of discussion probably not taking place anywhere within our own governmental structure. Play it again, Sam!

    4 · February 22, 2014

    • Sam S.

      Thank you so much for your positive feedback Karen. I will be happy to do this again. And thanks for coming. It's always good to see you and your +1. lol

      2 · February 23, 2014

    • Karen

      :-) Ditto, Sam :-)

      2 · February 23, 2014

  • Sam S.

    Here are the two books that where brought up in our meet up. "The Social Conquest of Earth" by E.O. Wilson. And "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith

    1 · February 23, 2014

    • Randy P.

      I'd like to add for anyone who may be planning to read The Wealth of Nations that you should also read Adam Smith's The Theory of Moral Sentiments. These two books are not separate but are part of a larger effort by Smith to develop what he called a "science of man". The full meaning of the Wealth of Nation's is not clear without also reading The Theory of Moral Sentiments.

      2 · February 23, 2014

  • Ron D.

    OMG! The argument has already commenced on what parties, if any, or all, or none, should be represented. And this is with nary a peep from hard right or tea party types. All I can say is GOOD LUCK! Be sure to have all weapons checked at the door. So out of curiosity, is everyone atheist, or at least religiously agnostic? Be nice to have some common ground.

    February 22, 2014

    • Mark T.

      Yep, pretty much a bunch of infidel heretics :)

      February 22, 2014

    • Ron D.

      Thank God for that, so to speak.

      2 · February 22, 2014

  • Ian Y.

    I personally think the "Democrat vs. Republican" is an example of the false dilemma or false dichotomy logical fallacy. Many other developed nations have multiple active political parties that actually have representation due to a parliamentary style government or proportional representation. There are too many different issues to try to match to one of two parties. Also conservative does not necessarily equate to Republican and liberal does not necessarily equate to Democrat.

    1 · February 22, 2014

    • Alida t.

      unfortunately, coalition govt.s don't appear to have a long life

      1 · February 22, 2014

    • A former member
      A former member

      Ian, I had originally thought of not joining this debate for exactly the same kind of reason; I thought the debate would be ideologically be too narrow, stuck between these two corporate parties that have been monopolizing the American politics, and I would once again feel like an alien from outer space. I decided to come because I was given a guarantee that not all participants will be limited to this narrow ideological range. I'm still hesitant, actually, but I will be there. I'm getting into my space ship in a few minutes.

      2 · February 22, 2014

  • Maude

    For my contribution, I started asking the kid (kinda Republican on some things) who works at the corner store if he knew anyone who would want to join us. Like, maybe, people from this gun club he knows of. Or something.

    1 · February 20, 2014

    • Maude

      Yes, actually, I lean toward being pro 2nd amendment. If I think about it, I supposed I have several of what would be considered more conservative stances.

      February 22, 2014

    • Mark T.

      Rightie! :)

      February 22, 2014

  • Mark T.

    On at least one issue, the libertarians have been WAY ahead of the curve. Which is, one of the most idiotic social experiments of all time (the "War on Drugs"). The decriminalization of pot was in the party platform as far back as 1992, when their presidential candidate was a person named Andre Meriue, if I remember correctly (who probably received like 0.1% of the vote :). Nowadays it's been adopted as a "progressive" cause, but for years not much support from so-called "liberal" Democrats (at least on a national level).

    1 · February 22, 2014

  • Alida t.

    the fight has been joined

    February 22, 2014

  • A former member
    A former member

    BIG MISTAKE IN MY RANT. NOT ESPIONAGE BUT EMBEZZLE. Although, I'm sure several are guilty of espionage also.

    February 21, 2014

    • Sam S.

      Thanks for the clarification Laura. There are plenty of bullshitters in the world. But not many spies.

      1 · February 22, 2014

  • Ron D.

    I don't think anybody here knows me personally because I haven't attended any meetups, but I am looking forward to doing so soon. And this one certainly promises to be interesting. But I have to wonder, have you had any meetups similar to this before? I can't imagine progressives and conservatives having a civil conversation these days. They certainly can't do it at a congressional level. As a liberal (at least mostly - I'm not very big on political correctness) I am fairly adamant about my beliefs, but my take is that 2nd Amendment enthusiasts, pro life activists, and the devoutly religious (just to mention a few mostly conservative groups) are not the sort open to compromise, or even a little bending. Fact is, in my long experience of debating with them (from a distance), they are much more likely to become extremely defensive, or worse, than ever consider another point of view. I guess I could be wrong though. I hope so. lol.

    2 · February 21, 2014

    • Mark T.

      Haha

      February 21, 2014

    • Sam S.

      The answer to your question Ron is, I don't ever remember having a meet up like this with the freethinkers. So buckle up it will be a long ride. BTW, I will have a gun for protection as long as this world remains as violent as it is.

      1 · February 22, 2014

  • Diane

    I definitely lean right and would enjoy this unless the weather gets crazy as I am an east sider. Great idea!

    February 18, 2014

    • Alida t.

      hey sam who do you think we are the US congress??

      2 · February 20, 2014

    • Sam S.

      No, that's why I think we can be more civil. Hell I guess I could be wrong.

      1 · February 21, 2014

  • A former member
    A former member

    You know, I've had it !! Every politician is corrupt & guilty of espionage. They squeeze every cent out of us they can get, through loop holes. Not caring about us, just about padding their bank acc'ts. Now they want to cut the veterans pensions. COULD THEY BE ANY WORSE. I'm not voting anymore unless it's for raising taxes, etc.

    We were on the "fiscal cliff" & what'd they do ? Made sure they got their useless raises passed. They deserve nothing !!

    February 21, 2014

  • Mark T.

    I hope y'all are still in the discussion post-9pm. I rsvp'd yes but I'll be shooting over after my gig. The idea for this meetup is too good to miss! Perhaps later installments should be titled "Political Diversity Convergence". I bet there is PLENTY of diversity of opinion even among those who would generally label themselves "left". For instance, I'm practically socialist on some things but at odds with a lot of modern liberals on some other things. There is MUCH to discuss when delving into individual issues and ideas.

    1 · February 20, 2014

    • Mark T.

      These days, it seems "liberal" is not always synonymous with "progressive".­

      1 · February 20, 2014

  • Mark T.

    Sam, great idea! I would certainly attend but I have a gig at 8pm in downtown Cleveland :( It's an opening-band thing though, and maybe I'll see some of you later if you head over to Applebee's, etc after Panera.

    1 · January 27, 2014

    • Mark T.

      I hope we do another one of these sometime!

      1 · January 27, 2014

    • Sam S.

      We can make this meeting a repeat. And since its Saturday I'm for applebee's afterward.

      February 16, 2014

  • Dale

    Too far to go for this weather.

    February 10, 2014

  • Suzy W.

    I very much like to hear how my friends think.

    January 28, 2014

  • A former member
    A former member

    I lean left, but hold several beliefs/attitudes that would probably be considered conservative, even though I loathe that word.

    2 · January 28, 2014

  • Dale

    Tentative. But it would be interesting to hear what will go on. Maybe you can start a Freethinker party. Everybody loves a party. ;-)

    January 26, 2014

  • Ron D.

    I don't think I've ever met a conservative, Republican humanist. Do they even exist?

    1 · January 26, 2014

  • A former member
    A former member

    So looking forward to this. The politicians in office are so corrupt. Voting is a joke. We need a truth side.

    January 26, 2014

  • Maude

    This is a fabulous idea, Sam. I'm a Democratic moderate-to-liberal. Ok, so we need some Republicans.

    January 25, 2014

    • Sam S.

      Yes we do Maude

      January 26, 2014

  • Randy P.

    I'll be there to assist in representing the progressive liberal perspective. More than happy to hear what conservatives and libertarians in the group have to say. I suggest that discuss first the underlying principles each side holds before tackling specific political issues.

    1 · January 26, 2014

    • Sam S.

      agreed Randy

      January 26, 2014

20 went

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy