addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1launch-new-window--smalllight-bulblinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Re: [humanism-174] O'Reilly vs. Silverman

From: Tim C.
Sent on: Thursday, November 29, 2012 8:07 PM
On church grounds, no. On private property, no.  On government property--a space paid for and supported by ALL taxpayers: Buddhists, atheists, Jews, Hindus, etc, yes, that would be "establishment".  Unless equal time and space is then provided to those of non-Christian beliefs!
Tim Campbell
In a message dated 11/29/2012 6:38:20 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [address removed] writes:
Is allowing a church to erect a Nativity display really the establishment of a religion?

Mike S

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy