addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1light-bulblinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Re: Re: [humanism-174] Pascal's Wager

From: user 7.
Sent on: Friday, September 25, 2009 9:07 AM
Assume it consumes (wastes) at a minimum 100 hours of a person's life to properly believe in God.  Assume there is a tiny (1 out of 100,000 chance that a God exists--and that he would have to be one that would punish someone for not believing in him).  In effect, that 10 million hours of wager--or over 11,410 years of life just in case there is such a good outcome for wasting the 100 hours.
Another way to argue it is to say someone should blow all his earnings on lottery tickets or life insurance.
The argument is a total fallacy that can be used to argue any expenditure for "risk reduction" but ignores the costs.

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy