addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobe--smallglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1launch-new-window--smalllight-bulblinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

The San Diego Alternative Energy Meetup Group Message Board Nuclear & Advanced Science › Nukes "not on the menu"

Nukes "not on the menu"

Jeffrey Paul A.
JeffreyPAnderson
San Diego, CA
Post #: 21
For the first time in over 20 years, the CA state Senate had a hearing on nuclear power. What is mostly preventing additional nukes from being built is a legislative ban until indefinite storage can be provided, but it is instructive to note that it doesn't solve the problem:

Even without the ban, turning to nuclear to reduce carbon emissions would be a major task. Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, R-Irvine, said the state would need to build four or five nuclear plants to achieve a 20 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions -- solely from the electricity sector. The state currently has two nuclear plants operating: San Onofre and Diablo Canyon, near San Luis Obispo.


Similar to what Nate Lewis is saying but on a smaller scale. This is a problem of tremendous scale.
Powered by mvnForum

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy