It boils down to this: "But it is very possible that we will nibble at biotechnology's tempting offerings without realizing that they come at a frightful moral cost."
Meaning, we are not moral enough to be trusted. Best not to try.
He then makes a slippery slope argument: "If we start transforming ourselves into something superior, what rights will these enhanced creatures claim, and what rights will they possess when compared to those left behind?"
And then an emotional appeal: "We need a similar humility concerning our human nature. If we do not develop it soon, we may unwittingly invite the transhumanists to deface humanity with their genetic bulldozers and psychotropic shopping malls."
I hope this is not considered a convincing argument against transhumanism.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:30, Anna <[address removed]>
The limited group of Thinkers on Facebook are not replying, so I figured I'll ask here: so, the most vocal opponent of transhumanism is Francis Fukuyama. Though I myself disagree with him on this, I would like to hear other opinions on his position. Please, take a look at his article on this topic and let me know if you agree or see any flaws:http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2004/09/01/transhumanism
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list (email@example.com)
This message was sent by Anna ([address removed]) from Tampa Bay Thinkers.
To learn more about Anna, visit his/her member profile: http://www.meetup.com/tampa-bay-thinkers/members/11276551/
Set my mailing list to email me
As they are sent
In one daily email
Don't send me mailing list messages
Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]