Re: [NYC-NJDUG] NJ proposed statute
| From: | Jonathan A. |
| Sent on: | Wednesday, June 3, 2015, 9:11 PM |
Reminds me of the laws invoked, around bridges: "no photography of the infrastructure of bridges" and on various bridges there are signs with a camera in a circle with a "slash." Several years ago, I spent 1/2 a day in my boat under the Tappanzee Bridge, photographing the entire span without an issue. Later that afternoon, in a rental car a NJ State trooper stopped me from photographing the bridge from the NJ side, on land from a public spot. Every bridge however has been photographed and is accessible from Google Maps I'm sure.
Are there not case studies showing this type of broad brush language is completely hog wash....Better not photograph a sewer culvert....under a highway.....or your dog playing in a field running past an irrigation culvert with a drone. its nutz.
Jonathan Atkin
People in this
group are also in:
-
Hudson Valley Hikers
54,822 Hudson Valley Hikers
-
NYC Big Data Science
8,773 Makers
-
Alternative to the Bar
23,278 NYC Adventure Seekers
-
New York Creative Socials
23,946 Creative Networkers
-
-
Advertising / Marketing Analysts
16,265 Data Nerds