addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-leftarrow-right-10x10arrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcredit-cardcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobe--smallglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1languagelaunch-new-window--smalllight-bulblightning-boltlinklocation-pinlockm-swarmSearchmailmediummessagesminusmobilemoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstar-shapestartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahooyoutube

Re: [algorithms-and-data-structures] (JOB) Senior Software Engineers and Juggle Fest Puzzle @ Yodle, NY

From: Joseph S.
Sent on: Sunday, October 31, 2010, 8:53 PM
I think at this point I've proved that there is no solution where all 
jugglers are assigned.  Are you *sure* you have a solution where all 
jugglers are assigned?  Did you programically check your answer?

Sam Sandberg wrote:
> Your algorithm must be incorrect somehow, as there is definitely a legit
> solution.
>
> I do wish that they provided more than one giant data set and one tiny
> one for testing purposes, but I guess you could write your own if you
> really needed it.
>
> -Sam
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:08 PM, J Shraibman <meetup.com
> <https://meetup.com...­ <https://jks.tupari...;­ wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Sam Sandberg wrote:
>

People in this
group are also in: