addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-leftarrow-right-10x10arrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcredit-cardcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobe--smallglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1languagelaunch-new-window--smalllight-bulblightning-boltlinklocation-pinlockm-swarmSearchmailmediummessagesminusmobilemoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstar-shapestartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahooyoutube

Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not)

From: Stan R.
Sent on: Thursday, April 12, 2012, 12:15 PM
David, you are talking religious concepts. "my way is right, who cares about your ideas, they are wrong" . The beauty is that most of the science is wrong but we are learning. Can you imagine if we accepted Newton as a end to all. We would not have Einstein. I am insisting the Einstein is wrong to get to the next stage of our science evolution.

Stan

Sent from my iPad

On[masked], at 12:02 PM, David <[address removed]> wrote:

For me, I'd rather not waste time dealing with a thousand pseudoscientific ideas. One of them may actually have something valuable to say, but it isn't like it will be totally lost forever. Anything valuable will eventually turn up as science progresses, whereas history is replete with half baked claims that are a waste of time.
 
Science is the best way we have of knowing what is going on.
 
My two cents,
David Reeve
----- Original Message -----
From: Hari Kumar
To: [address removed]
Sent: Thursday, April 12,[masked]:50 AM
Subject: Re: [physicsnorthyork] Science (and what it's not)

I am at work right now, so I need to keep my message as brief as possible. I will respond to this in detail later today. However I have just this to say at the moment. The true skeptical scientist should begin by being skeptical of even skepticism itself and its role in science. Instead of blindly following the herd and copy pasting links from Wikipedia it would do one well to challenge the existing paradigms and question their validity in an unbiased manner. To me, I would suffer a thousand so called pseudoscientific ideas, rather than risk losing a single discovery that could have changed the world.

Regards, Hari

On Apr 12,[masked]:24 AM, "Hugh" <[address removed]> wrote:

Something can’t be physics without being science.

It’s important to know what science is.

It can also be illuminating (and fun) studying what science is not:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience

 

There’s some crazy stuff out there, that puzzles and delights scientists.

Quantum biology included.

Quantum biology is a recent and surprising discovery,

and full of legitimate and well done science.

 

There’s plenty of pseudoscience too,

much of it based on politics and wishful thinking.

Environmental science is rife with this sort of evangelical propaganda, for example.

 

Then there is criminal fraud,

using the trappings of science to prey on human nature

and bilk people out of money.

This is the category the dangerous THRIVE videos fall solidly into.





--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Hugh ([address removed]) from North York Physics Group.
To learn more about Hugh, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Hari Kumar ([address removed]) from North York Physics Group.
To learn more about Hari Kumar, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by David ([address removed]) from North York Physics Group.
To learn more about David, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]

People in this
group are also in: